Pub Date : 2025-02-14DOI: 10.1007/s00190-025-01942-w
S. Yang, A. Khodabandeh, S. Zaminpardaz, P. J. G. Teunissen
While integer ambiguity resolution (IAR) enables GNSS to achieve real-time sub-centimeter-level positioning in open-sky environments, it can be easily hindered if the involved receivers are situated in areas with limited satellite visibility, such as in dense city environments. In such GNSS-challenged cases, commercial Low Earth Orbit (LEO) communication satellites can potentially augment GNSS by providing additional measurements. However, LEO satellites often lack code measurements, mainly transmitting satellite-specific frequency-varying carrier phase signals. This contribution aims to study the ambiguity-resolved baseline positioning performance of such phase-only signals, addressing the extent to which LEO constellations can realize near real-time positioning in standalone and GNSS-combined modes. Through a simulation platform, we analyze the distinct response of each LEO constellation (Iridium, Globalstar, Starlink, OneWeb, and Orbcomm) to IAR under various circumstances. Although achieving single-receiver high-precision positioning can be challenged by inaccuracies in the LEO satellite orbit products, the relative distance between two receivers can help overcome this limitation. As a result, centimeter-level relative positioning over short baselines can be made possible, even with a satellite elevation cut-off angle of 50 degrees, making it suitable for GNSS-challenged environments. This can be achieved with high-grade receiver clocks over very short baselines ((sim )5 km) and access to decimeter-level orbit products.
虽然整数模糊分辨率(IAR)使全球导航卫星系统能够在开阔天空环境中实现亚厘米级的实时定位,但如果相关接收器位于卫星能见度有限的区域(如密集的城市环境),则很容易受到阻碍。在这种全球导航卫星系统受到挑战的情况下,商业低地轨道(LEO)通信卫星有可能通过提供额外的测量数据来增强全球导航卫星系统。然而,低地轨道卫星通常缺乏代码测量,主要是传输卫星特定频率变化的载波相位信号。本文旨在研究此类纯相位信号的模糊分辨基线定位性能,探讨低地轨道星座在独立模式和全球导航卫星系统组合模式下实现近实时定位的程度。通过模拟平台,我们分析了每个低地轨道星座(铱星、全球星、星链、OneWeb 和 Orbcomm)在各种情况下对 IAR 的不同响应。虽然低地轨道卫星轨道产品的不准确性会对实现单接收器高精度定位造成挑战,但两个接收器之间的相对距离有助于克服这一限制。因此,即使卫星仰角为 50 度,也能在短基线上实现厘米级相对定位,从而使其适用于全球导航卫星系统受到挑战的环境。在极短基线((sim )5公里)上使用高等级接收器时钟并获得分米级轨道产品,就可以实现这一目标。
{"title":"Ambiguity-resolved short-baseline positioning performance of LEO frequency-varying carrier phase signals: a feasibility study","authors":"S. Yang, A. Khodabandeh, S. Zaminpardaz, P. J. G. Teunissen","doi":"10.1007/s00190-025-01942-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01942-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While integer ambiguity resolution (IAR) enables GNSS to achieve real-time sub-centimeter-level positioning in open-sky environments, it can be easily hindered if the involved receivers are situated in areas with limited satellite visibility, such as in dense city environments. In such GNSS-challenged cases, commercial Low Earth Orbit (LEO) communication satellites can potentially augment GNSS by providing additional measurements. However, LEO satellites often lack code measurements, mainly transmitting satellite-specific frequency-varying carrier phase signals. This contribution aims to study the ambiguity-resolved baseline positioning performance of such phase-only signals, addressing the extent to which LEO constellations can realize near real-time positioning in standalone and GNSS-combined modes. Through a simulation platform, we analyze the distinct response of each LEO constellation (Iridium, Globalstar, Starlink, OneWeb, and Orbcomm) to IAR under various circumstances. Although achieving <i>single-receiver</i> high-precision positioning can be challenged by inaccuracies in the LEO satellite orbit products, the relative distance between two receivers can help overcome this limitation. As a result, centimeter-level relative positioning over short baselines can be made possible, even with a satellite elevation cut-off angle of 50 degrees, making it suitable for GNSS-challenged environments. This can be achieved with high-grade receiver clocks over very short baselines (<span>(sim )</span>5 km) and access to decimeter-level orbit products.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143418076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-13DOI: 10.1007/s00190-025-01938-6
Georgia Gavriilidou, Dimitrios Tsoulis
The stochastic representation of an uncertain shape model allows the dynamic evaluation of its induced gravity signal. This can be also applied for representing a time variable gravity field to model mass changes. The algorithm for estimating variations in gravitational potential is extended for the case of second-order derivatives. Two different harmonic synthesis formulas are used to derive the sought variations: one expressed in spherical coordinates using the traditional associated Legendre functions (ALF) and their derivatives up to the second order, while the other expressed in Cartesian coordinates by including the derived Legendre functions (DLF). The obtained variations are compared in terms of convergence with gravity signal differences referring to the specific shape changes using the line integral analytical approach for three asteroid shape models. Both approaches provide results that differ from the analytical method at a 1E−1 level, while the differences between them are at the 1E−15 level. The obtained results are highly influenced by the geometry of the examined shape model, with the ALF approach providing variations with closer agreement with the analytical method only for the almost spherical shape. Both harmonic synthesis expressions can be used to derive accurate results, as they differ at a very low level, and one can choose based on the convenience of their algorithmic characteristics.
{"title":"Stochastic modelling of polyhedral gravity signal variations. Part II: Second-order derivatives of gravitational potential","authors":"Georgia Gavriilidou, Dimitrios Tsoulis","doi":"10.1007/s00190-025-01938-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01938-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The stochastic representation of an uncertain shape model allows the dynamic evaluation of its induced gravity signal. This can be also applied for representing a time variable gravity field to model mass changes. The algorithm for estimating variations in gravitational potential is extended for the case of second-order derivatives. Two different harmonic synthesis formulas are used to derive the sought variations: one expressed in spherical coordinates using the traditional associated Legendre functions (ALF) and their derivatives up to the second order, while the other expressed in Cartesian coordinates by including the derived Legendre functions (DLF). The obtained variations are compared in terms of convergence with gravity signal differences referring to the specific shape changes using the line integral analytical approach for three asteroid shape models. Both approaches provide results that differ from the analytical method at a 1E−1 level, while the differences between them are at the 1E−15 level. The obtained results are highly influenced by the geometry of the examined shape model, with the ALF approach providing variations with closer agreement with the analytical method only for the almost spherical shape. Both harmonic synthesis expressions can be used to derive accurate results, as they differ at a very low level, and one can choose based on the convenience of their algorithmic characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143401625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-13DOI: 10.1007/s00190-025-01941-x
R. Dill, L. Stumpe, J. Saynisch-Wagner, M. Thomas, H. Dobslaw
Effective angular momentum (EAM) forecasts are widely used as an important input for predicting both polar motion and dUT1. So far, model predictions for atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial hydrosphere utilized in Earth rotation research reach only 6-days into the future. GFZ’s oceanic and land-surface model forecasts are forced with operational 6-day high-resolution deterministic numerical weather predictions provided by the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts. Those atmospheric forecasts extend also further into the future with a reduced sampling rate of just 6 h but the prediction skill decreases rapidly after roughly one week. To decide about publishing 10-day instead of 6-day model-based EAM forecasts, we generated a test set of 454 individual 10-day forecasts and used it with GFZ’s EAM Predictor method to calculate Earth rotation predictions. Using 10-day instead of 6-day EAM forecasts leads to slight improvements in y-pole and dUT1 predictions for 10 to 30 days ahead. By introducing additional neural network models trained on the errors of the EAM forecasts when compared to their subsequently available analysis runs, Earth rotation prediction can be enhanced even further. A reduction of the mean absolute errors for polar motion and length-of-day prediction at a forecast horizon of 10 days of 26.8% in x-pole, 15.5% in y-pole, 27.6% in dUT1, and 47.1% in (Delta )LOD is achieved. This test application successfully demonstrates the potential of the extended EAM forecasts for Earth rotation prediction although the success rate has to be further improved to arrive at robust routine predictions. GFZ publishes from October 2024 onwards raw uncorrected 10-day instead of 6-day EAM forecasts at www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/esmdata for the individual contributions of atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial hydrosphere. Users interested in the summarized effect of all subsystems are advised to use the 90-day combined EAM forecast product that also makes use of the presented corrections to the EAM forecasts.
{"title":"Benefits of refined 10-day effective angular momentum forecasts for earth rotation parameter prediction","authors":"R. Dill, L. Stumpe, J. Saynisch-Wagner, M. Thomas, H. Dobslaw","doi":"10.1007/s00190-025-01941-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01941-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective angular momentum (EAM) forecasts are widely used as an important input for predicting both polar motion and dUT1. So far, model predictions for atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial hydrosphere utilized in Earth rotation research reach only 6-days into the future. GFZ’s oceanic and land-surface model forecasts are forced with operational 6-day high-resolution deterministic numerical weather predictions provided by the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts. Those atmospheric forecasts extend also further into the future with a reduced sampling rate of just 6 h but the prediction skill decreases rapidly after roughly one week. To decide about publishing 10-day instead of 6-day model-based EAM forecasts, we generated a test set of 454 individual 10-day forecasts and used it with GFZ’s EAM Predictor method to calculate Earth rotation predictions. Using 10-day instead of 6-day EAM forecasts leads to slight improvements in y-pole and dUT1 predictions for 10 to 30 days ahead. By introducing additional neural network models trained on the errors of the EAM forecasts when compared to their subsequently available analysis runs, Earth rotation prediction can be enhanced even further. A reduction of the mean absolute errors for polar motion and length-of-day prediction at a forecast horizon of 10 days of 26.8% in x-pole, 15.5% in y-pole, 27.6% in dUT1, and 47.1% in <span>(Delta )</span>LOD is achieved. This test application successfully demonstrates the potential of the extended EAM forecasts for Earth rotation prediction although the success rate has to be further improved to arrive at robust routine predictions. GFZ publishes from October 2024 onwards raw uncorrected 10-day instead of 6-day EAM forecasts at www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/esmdata for the individual contributions of atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial hydrosphere. Users interested in the summarized effect of all subsystems are advised to use the 90-day combined EAM forecast product that also makes use of the presented corrections to the EAM forecasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143401624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-11DOI: 10.1007/s00190-025-01934-w
Artur Fischer, Krzysztof Nowel, Slawomir Cellmer
The geodetic community commonly challenges the composite hypotheses in the statistical testing of mathematical models. Since the composite hypotheses are not specified as opposed to their simple counterparts, they require a prior estimation of the model parameters. However, if the mathematical models are ill-conditioned, the regularized estimation is often applied for the parameters of interest. Due to the biased property, the regularized estimation does not rigorously originate in the principle of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation, which was the base for developing the theory of the generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) test. Since the regularized estimator of the parameters of interest is consequently inconsistent with the ML one, one cannot construct the GLR test, which is the uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) test. So far, only the bias correction approach has been suggested to solve this problem. In this contribution, an implicit representation of the regularized mathematical model is proposed. It eliminates the complete impact of regularized estimation on a mathematical model and delivers the misclosures analytically free from the influence of regularization. Thus, one can construct the GLR test, which belongs to the UMPI family, and then formulate the test statistic in terms of misclosures.
{"title":"The statistical testing of regularized mathematical models in geodetic data processing","authors":"Artur Fischer, Krzysztof Nowel, Slawomir Cellmer","doi":"10.1007/s00190-025-01934-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01934-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The geodetic community commonly challenges the composite hypotheses in the statistical testing of mathematical models. Since the composite hypotheses are not specified as opposed to their simple counterparts, they require <i>a prior</i> estimation of the model parameters. However, if the mathematical models are ill-conditioned, the regularized estimation is often applied for the parameters of interest. Due to the biased property, the regularized estimation does not rigorously originate in the principle of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation, which was the base for developing the theory of the generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) test. Since the regularized estimator of the parameters of interest is consequently inconsistent with the ML one, one cannot construct the GLR test, which is the uniformly most powerful invariant (UMPI) test. So far, only the bias correction approach has been suggested to solve this problem. In this contribution, an implicit representation of the regularized mathematical model is proposed. It eliminates the complete impact of regularized estimation on a mathematical model and delivers the misclosures analytically free from the influence of regularization. Thus, one can construct the GLR test, which belongs to the UMPI family, and then formulate the test statistic in terms of misclosures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143393048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As a critical parameter in meteorological monitoring, precipitable water vapor (PWV) is widely used in short-term extreme weather forecasting and long-term climate change research. However, as PWV exhibits significant vertical attenuation, especially within 2 km, achieving accurate vertical interpolation is essential for comparisons and fusion across different measurement techniques, such as sampling water vapor at different heights. PWV vertical adjustment relies only on the empirical or time-varying lapse rate models (e.g., GPWV-H). The non-uniform vertical distribution of PWV and the uncertain variation trend in the low-latitude region still limit the accuracy. To address these issues, we propose the Spatially enhanced Vertical Adjustment Model for PWV (SPWV-H), taking into account the non-uniform distribution in the vertical direction based on the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Atmospheric Reanalysis (ERA5) products. The assessment, validated against the ERA5 benchmark, highlights the SPWV-H model’s superior performance with an RMSE of 1 mm and a bias of 0.03 mm, especially pronounced in the low-latitude region. Compared to global radiosonde datasets, the SPWV-H model achieves notable reductions in RMSE of 12%, 11%, and 18% when evaluated against the EPWV-H, GPWV-H, and GPT3-1 models, respectively. In spatial interpolation, the SPWV-H model achieves an RMSE of 1.22 mm, indicating an improvement of 10%, 9%, and 14% compared to the EPWV-H, GPWV-H, and GPT3-1 models, respectively. Therefore, the SPWV-H model can provide a reliable service for multi-source PWV fusion and real-time PWV monitoring by GNSS.
{"title":"Spatially enhanced interpolating vertical adjustment model for precipitable water vapor","authors":"Hao Yang, Vagner Ferreira, Xiufeng He, Wei Zhan, Xiaolei Wang, Shengyue Ji","doi":"10.1007/s00190-025-01936-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01936-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a critical parameter in meteorological monitoring, precipitable water vapor (PWV) is widely used in short-term extreme weather forecasting and long-term climate change research. However, as PWV exhibits significant vertical attenuation, especially within 2 km, achieving accurate vertical interpolation is essential for comparisons and fusion across different measurement techniques, such as sampling water vapor at different heights. PWV vertical adjustment relies only on the empirical or time-varying lapse rate models (e.g., GPWV-H). The non-uniform vertical distribution of PWV and the uncertain variation trend in the low-latitude region still limit the accuracy. To address these issues, we propose the Spatially enhanced Vertical Adjustment Model for PWV (SPWV-H), taking into account the non-uniform distribution in the vertical direction based on the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Atmospheric Reanalysis (ERA5) products. The assessment, validated against the ERA5 benchmark, highlights the SPWV-H model’s superior performance with an RMSE of 1 mm and a bias of 0.03 mm, especially pronounced in the low-latitude region. Compared to global radiosonde datasets, the SPWV-H model achieves notable reductions in RMSE of 12%, 11%, and 18% when evaluated against the EPWV-H, GPWV-H, and GPT3-1 models, respectively. In spatial interpolation, the SPWV-H model achieves an RMSE of 1.22 mm, indicating an improvement of 10%, 9%, and 14% compared to the EPWV-H, GPWV-H, and GPT3-1 models, respectively. Therefore, the SPWV-H model can provide a reliable service for multi-source PWV fusion and real-time PWV monitoring by GNSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143367391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-08DOI: 10.1007/s00190-025-01939-5
Yongqiang Yuan, Xingxing Li, Hongjie Zheng, Chutian Gao, Xia Yao
In February 2023, the International Laser Ranging Service started the tracking of additional medium Earth orbit satellites from the global BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) constellation, increasing the total number of tracked BDS satellites to 27. As an optical space geodesy technique, the Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) provides another important measurement for BDS other than the microwave (L-band) one. Based on three years of data from June 2021 to May 2024, the potential benefits of introducing SLR data into BDS processing and analysis are investigated from three key aspects: orbit validation, precise orbit determination, and geodetic parameters estimation. The independent SLR validations of BDS precise orbit products from four analysis centers show that using the a priori box-wing model for solar radiation pressure (SRP) modeling can achieve superior performance than purely empirical models. The results also indicate the existence of SRP modeling deficiencies for some satellites such as C45 and C46 with Search and Rescue payloads. Given a sparse ground network with 5 stations, the introduction of SLR significantly stabilizes the SRP parameter estimates and improves the orbit accuracy by 44.4%. In terms of geodetic parameter estimation, the scatter of the Z-component geocenter motion can be effectively reduced with the inclusion of SLR data, presenting 10.9–15.3% smaller root mean square (RMS) values during February 2023 and May 2024, depending on the SRP models. In addition, the annual amplitudes of the Z-component geocenter motion are reduced by 7.2–48.2%. The improvement is more pronounced with a limited number of microwave stations, due to the greater strength of SLR observations in geocenter motion estimation. On the other hand, since the SLR observations are unhomogeneously distributed in both space and time, the incorporation of SLR does not evidently enhance the accuracy of Earth rotation parameters, and may even to some extent contaminate the results when the number of microwave stations is limited.
{"title":"Incorporating Satellite Laser Ranging observations into BDS analysis: from the perspectives of orbit validation, precise orbit determination, and geodetic parameters estimation","authors":"Yongqiang Yuan, Xingxing Li, Hongjie Zheng, Chutian Gao, Xia Yao","doi":"10.1007/s00190-025-01939-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01939-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In February 2023, the International Laser Ranging Service started the tracking of additional medium Earth orbit satellites from the global BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) constellation, increasing the total number of tracked BDS satellites to 27. As an optical space geodesy technique, the Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) provides another important measurement for BDS other than the microwave (L-band) one. Based on three years of data from June 2021 to May 2024, the potential benefits of introducing SLR data into BDS processing and analysis are investigated from three key aspects: orbit validation, precise orbit determination, and geodetic parameters estimation. The independent SLR validations of BDS precise orbit products from four analysis centers show that using the a priori box-wing model for solar radiation pressure (SRP) modeling can achieve superior performance than purely empirical models. The results also indicate the existence of SRP modeling deficiencies for some satellites such as C45 and C46 with Search and Rescue payloads. Given a sparse ground network with 5 stations, the introduction of SLR significantly stabilizes the SRP parameter estimates and improves the orbit accuracy by 44.4%. In terms of geodetic parameter estimation, the scatter of the Z-component geocenter motion can be effectively reduced with the inclusion of SLR data, presenting 10.9–15.3% smaller root mean square (RMS) values during February 2023 and May 2024, depending on the SRP models. In addition, the annual amplitudes of the Z-component geocenter motion are reduced by 7.2–48.2%. The improvement is more pronounced with a limited number of microwave stations, due to the greater strength of SLR observations in geocenter motion estimation. On the other hand, since the SLR observations are unhomogeneously distributed in both space and time, the incorporation of SLR does not evidently enhance the accuracy of Earth rotation parameters, and may even to some extent contaminate the results when the number of microwave stations is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143367392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-04DOI: 10.1007/s00190-025-01935-9
Richard D. Ray, Michael Schindelegger
Trends in the deep-ocean M(_2) barotropic tide, deduced from nearly three decades of satellite altimetry and recently presented by Opel et al. (Commun Earth Environ 5:261, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01432-5, 2024), are here updated with a slightly longer time series and with a focus on potential systematic errors. Tidal changes are very small, of order 0.2 mm/year or less, with a tendency for decreasing amplitudes, which is evidently a response to the ocean’s increasing stratification and an increasing energy loss to baroclinic motion. A variety of systematic errors in the satellite altimeter system potentially corrupt these small trend estimates. The Dynamic Atmosphere Correction (DAC), derived from an ocean model and used for de-aliasing, introduces a spurious trend (exceeding 0.1 mm/year in places) caused by changes in ECMWF atmospheric tides. Both operational and reanalysis atmospheric tides have spurious trends over the altimeter era. Tidally coherent errors in satellite orbits, including from use of inconsistent tidal geocenter models, are more difficult to bound, although differences between two sets of satellite ephemerides are found to reach 0.1 mm/year for M(_2). Orbit errors are more deleterious for some other constituents, including the annual cycle. Tidal leakage in the “mesoscale correction,” needed here to suppress non-tidal ocean variability, is a known potential problem, and if the leakage changes over time, it impacts ocean-tide trend estimation. Tests show the error is likely small in the open ocean ((<0.04) mm/year) but large in some marginal seas ((>0.2) mm/year). Potential contamination from other altimeter corrections (e.g., ionospheric path delay) is likely negligible for M(_2) but can be difficult to bound.
{"title":"Trends in the M $$_2$$ ocean tide observed by satellite altimetry in the presence of systematic errors","authors":"Richard D. Ray, Michael Schindelegger","doi":"10.1007/s00190-025-01935-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01935-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Trends in the deep-ocean M<span>(_2)</span> barotropic tide, deduced from nearly three decades of satellite altimetry and recently presented by Opel et al. (Commun Earth Environ 5:261, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01432-5, 2024), are here updated with a slightly longer time series and with a focus on potential systematic errors. Tidal changes are very small, of order 0.2 mm/year or less, with a tendency for decreasing amplitudes, which is evidently a response to the ocean’s increasing stratification and an increasing energy loss to baroclinic motion. A variety of systematic errors in the satellite altimeter system potentially corrupt these small trend estimates. The Dynamic Atmosphere Correction (DAC), derived from an ocean model and used for de-aliasing, introduces a spurious trend (exceeding 0.1 mm/year in places) caused by changes in ECMWF atmospheric tides. Both operational and reanalysis atmospheric tides have spurious trends over the altimeter era. Tidally coherent errors in satellite orbits, including from use of inconsistent tidal geocenter models, are more difficult to bound, although differences between two sets of satellite ephemerides are found to reach 0.1 mm/year for M<span>(_2)</span>. Orbit errors are more deleterious for some other constituents, including the annual cycle. Tidal leakage in the “mesoscale correction,” needed here to suppress non-tidal ocean variability, is a known potential problem, and if the leakage changes over time, it impacts ocean-tide trend estimation. Tests show the error is likely small in the open ocean (<span>(<0.04)</span> mm/year) but large in some marginal seas (<span>(>0.2)</span> mm/year). Potential contamination from other altimeter corrections (e.g., ionospheric path delay) is likely negligible for M<span>(_2)</span> but can be difficult to bound.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"1209 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143125096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-18DOI: 10.1007/s00190-024-01926-2
Sergey Kudryavtsev
Latest harmonic developments of the Earth tide-generating potential (TGP), e.g., HW95 (Hartmann and Wenzel in Geoph Res Lett 22:3553, 1995), RATGP95 (Roosbeek in Geophys J Int 126:197, 1996), KSM03 (Kudryavtsev in J Geodesy 77:829, 2004), include a number of terms caused by the joint effect of the Earth’s polar flattening (that can be numerically described by the ({J}_{2}) geopotential coefficient) and the Moon/the Sun gravitational attraction. In the present study, we additionally consider the effect of the Earth’s equatorial flattening due to the Earth’s triaxiality. Explicit analytical expressions for the relevant part of the TGP are derived. New terms of the TGP development due to the Earth’s triaxial figure are found. Amplitudes of nineteen of them exceed the threshold level of 10–8 m2s−2 used by the modern tidal potential catalogs. Three of the new terms have the frequency sign opposite to that of the Earth rotation. It is not the case for any previously known term of the Earth TGP development. Every term has a new feature that an integer multiplier of the mean local lunar time used in its argument is not equal to the order of the spherical harmonic associated with the term. It necessitates a relevant modification of the standard HW95 format for representing the Earth TGP. The new terms are suggested for including in the current and future tidal potential catalogs.
地球潮汐发电势(TGP)的最新谐波发展,例如HW95 (Hartmann and Wenzel in Geoph Res Lett 22:3553, 1995)、RATGP95 (Roosbeek in Geophys J Int 126:197, 1996)、KSM03 (Kudryavtsev in J Geodesy 77:829, 2004),都包含了由地球极地扁平化(可用 ({J}_{2}) 地球位势系数进行数值描述)和月球/太阳引力共同作用引起的一些项。在本研究中,我们还考虑了地球三轴性导致的地球赤道扁平化的影响。我们推导出了 TGP 相关部分的明确分析表达式。发现了由于地球的三轴性而导致的 TGP 发展的新项。其中 19 项的振幅超过了现代潮汐势编目所使用的 10-8 m2s-2 的临界值。其中三个新项的频率符号与地球自转的频率符号相反。而以前已知的地球 TGP 发展项都不存在这种情况。每个术语都有一个新特征,即其参数中使用的当地平均月球时间的整数倍不等于与该术语相关的球面谐波的阶数。这就需要对表示地球 TGP 的标准 HW95 格式进行相关修改。建议将新术语纳入当前和未来的潮汐势目录。
{"title":"Effect of the Earth’s triaxiality on the tide-generating potential","authors":"Sergey Kudryavtsev","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01926-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01926-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Latest harmonic developments of the Earth tide-generating potential (TGP), e.g., HW95 (Hartmann and Wenzel in Geoph Res Lett 22:3553, 1995), RATGP95 (Roosbeek in Geophys J Int 126:197, 1996), KSM03 (Kudryavtsev in J Geodesy 77:829, 2004), include a number of terms caused by the joint effect of the Earth’s <i>polar</i> flattening (that can be numerically described by the <span>({J}_{2})</span> geopotential coefficient) and the Moon/the Sun gravitational attraction. In the present study, we additionally consider the effect of the Earth’s <i>equatorial</i> flattening due to the Earth’s triaxiality. Explicit analytical expressions for the relevant part of the TGP are derived. New terms of the TGP development due to the Earth’s triaxial figure are found. Amplitudes of nineteen of them exceed the threshold level of 10<sup>–8</sup> m<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−2</sup> used by the modern tidal potential catalogs. Three of the new terms have the frequency sign opposite to that of the Earth rotation. It is not the case for any previously known term of the Earth TGP development. Every term has a new feature that an integer multiplier of the mean local lunar time used in its argument is not equal to the order of the spherical harmonic associated with the term. It necessitates a relevant modification of the standard HW95 format for representing the Earth TGP. The new terms are suggested for including in the current and future tidal potential catalogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142990032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17DOI: 10.1007/s00190-024-01932-4
Zhitao Lyu, Yang Gao
Partial ambiguity resolution (PAR) has been widely adopted in real-time kinematic (RTK) and precise point positioning with augmentation from continuously operating reference station (PPP-RTK). However, current PAR methods, either in the position domain or the ambiguity domain, suffer from high false alarm and miss detection, particularly in challenging environments with poor satellite geometry and observations contaminated by non-line-of-sight (NLOS) effects, gross errors, biases, and high observation noise. To address these issues, a PAR method based on machine learning is proposed to significantly improve the correct fix rate and positioning accuracy of PAR in challenging environments. This method combines two support vector machine (SVM) classifiers to effectively identify and exclude ambiguities those are contaminated by bias sources from PAR without relying on satellite geometry. The proposed method is validated with three vehicle-based field tests covering open sky, suburban, and dense urban environments, and the results show significant improvements in terms of correct fix rate and positioning accuracy over the traditional PAR method that only utilizes ambiguity covariances. The fix rates achieved with the proposed method are 93.9%, 81.9%, and 93.1% with the three respective field tests, with no wrong fixes, compared to 72.8%, 20.9%, and 16.0% correct fix rates using the traditional method. The positioning error root mean square (RMS) is 0.020 m, 0.035 m, and 0.056 m in the east, north, and up directions for the first field test, 0.027 m, 0.080 m, and 0.126 m for the second field test, and 0.035 m, 0.042 m, and 0.071 m for the third field test. In contrast, only decimeter- to meter-level accuracy was obtainable with these datasets using the traditional method due to the high wrong fix rate. The proposed method provides a correct and fast time-to-first-fix (TTFF) of 3–5 s, even in challenging environments. Overall, the proposed method offers significant improvements in positioning accuracy and ambiguity fix rate with high reliability, making it a promising solution for PAR in challenging environments.
{"title":"A machine learning-based partial ambiguity resolution method for precise positioning in challenging environments","authors":"Zhitao Lyu, Yang Gao","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01932-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01932-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Partial ambiguity resolution (PAR) has been widely adopted in real-time kinematic (RTK) and precise point positioning with augmentation from continuously operating reference station (PPP-RTK). However, current PAR methods, either in the position domain or the ambiguity domain, suffer from high false alarm and miss detection, particularly in challenging environments with poor satellite geometry and observations contaminated by non-line-of-sight (NLOS) effects, gross errors, biases, and high observation noise. To address these issues, a PAR method based on machine learning is proposed to significantly improve the correct fix rate and positioning accuracy of PAR in challenging environments. This method combines two support vector machine (SVM) classifiers to effectively identify and exclude ambiguities those are contaminated by bias sources from PAR without relying on satellite geometry. The proposed method is validated with three vehicle-based field tests covering open sky, suburban, and dense urban environments, and the results show significant improvements in terms of correct fix rate and positioning accuracy over the traditional PAR method that only utilizes ambiguity covariances. The fix rates achieved with the proposed method are 93.9%, 81.9%, and 93.1% with the three respective field tests, with no wrong fixes, compared to 72.8%, 20.9%, and 16.0% correct fix rates using the traditional method. The positioning error root mean square (RMS) is 0.020 m, 0.035 m, and 0.056 m in the east, north, and up directions for the first field test, 0.027 m, 0.080 m, and 0.126 m for the second field test, and 0.035 m, 0.042 m, and 0.071 m for the third field test. In contrast, only decimeter- to meter-level accuracy was obtainable with these datasets using the traditional method due to the high wrong fix rate. The proposed method provides a correct and fast time-to-first-fix (TTFF) of 3–5 s, even in challenging environments. Overall, the proposed method offers significant improvements in positioning accuracy and ambiguity fix rate with high reliability, making it a promising solution for PAR in challenging environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142987635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}