Daily associations between global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity and their relationships with subjective well‐being in a sample of adult workers

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12934
Lorenzo Filosa, Valentina Sommovigo, Simone Tavolucci, Valentina Rosa, Fabio Alivernini, Roberto Baiocco, Anna Borghi, Andrea Chirico, Chiara Fini, Tommaso Palombi, Jessica Pistella, Fabio Lucidi, Guido Alessandri
{"title":"Daily associations between global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity and their relationships with subjective well‐being in a sample of adult workers","authors":"Lorenzo Filosa, Valentina Sommovigo, Simone Tavolucci, Valentina Rosa, Fabio Alivernini, Roberto Baiocco, Anna Borghi, Andrea Chirico, Chiara Fini, Tommaso Palombi, Jessica Pistella, Fabio Lucidi, Guido Alessandri","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesThe present pre‐registered study examined the reciprocal day‐to‐day associations between global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity and their incremental validity with respect to daily life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect.MethodsWe used intensive longitudinal data from 153 adult workers (45.1% women), over a period of 31 days. Data were analyzed using dynamic structural equation modeling.ResultsResults attested higher global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity mean levels for older vs. younger participants, and lower global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity variability for older vs. younger participants. Furthermore, global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity were correlated at a cross‐sectional daily level, yet only self‐concept clarity states positively predicted subsequent global self‐esteem states, while global self‐esteem states did not predict subsequent self‐concept clarity states. Daily global self‐esteem and daily self‐concept clarity further predicted subsequent daily higher life satisfaction and positive affect, respectively.ConclusionOverall, our findings shed light on the short‐term relationships linking global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity, pointing to their discriminant validity in predicting individuals' subjective well‐being.","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThe present pre‐registered study examined the reciprocal day‐to‐day associations between global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity and their incremental validity with respect to daily life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect.MethodsWe used intensive longitudinal data from 153 adult workers (45.1% women), over a period of 31 days. Data were analyzed using dynamic structural equation modeling.ResultsResults attested higher global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity mean levels for older vs. younger participants, and lower global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity variability for older vs. younger participants. Furthermore, global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity were correlated at a cross‐sectional daily level, yet only self‐concept clarity states positively predicted subsequent global self‐esteem states, while global self‐esteem states did not predict subsequent self‐concept clarity states. Daily global self‐esteem and daily self‐concept clarity further predicted subsequent daily higher life satisfaction and positive affect, respectively.ConclusionOverall, our findings shed light on the short‐term relationships linking global self‐esteem and self‐concept clarity, pointing to their discriminant validity in predicting individuals' subjective well‐being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成年工人样本中全面自尊和自我概念清晰度之间的日常关联及其与主观幸福感的关系
方法我们使用了 153 名成年工人(45.1% 为女性)为期 31 天的密集纵向数据,采用动态结构方程模型对数据进行了分析。结果显示,年龄较大的参与者与年龄较小的参与者相比,总体自尊和自我概念清晰度的平均水平较高,而年龄较大的参与者与年龄较小的参与者相比,总体自尊和自我概念清晰度的变异性较低。此外,总体自尊和自我概念清晰度在每日横截面水平上存在相关性,但只有自我概念清晰度状态能积极预测随后的总体自尊状态,而总体自尊状态不能预测随后的自我概念清晰度状态。总之,我们的研究结果揭示了全球自尊和自我概念清晰度之间的短期联系,指出了它们在预测个人主观幸福感方面的鉴别有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Measures of Subclinical Psychopathy and Everyday Sadism are Still Redundant: A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Blötner and Mokros (2023). The (Un)Attractiveness of Dark Triad Personalities: Assessing Fictitious Characters for Short- and Long-Term Relationships. Understanding Parenting Stress in Adoptive Parents: A Longitudinal Multilevel Study of Parents' Self-Criticism, Child Negative Emotionality, and Child Age at Placement. Personality and Meat Consumption Among Romantic Partners in Daily Life Development of Self‐Reported Reward Responsiveness and Inhibitory Control and the Role of Clinical and Neural Predictors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1