The Political-Administrative Nexus in Sub-National Governance: Exploring the Lack of Independent Administration in Poland

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES East European Politics and Societies Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1177/08883254241229732
Witold Betkiewicz, Anna Radiukiewicz
{"title":"The Political-Administrative Nexus in Sub-National Governance: Exploring the Lack of Independent Administration in Poland","authors":"Witold Betkiewicz, Anna Radiukiewicz","doi":"10.1177/08883254241229732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main problem addressed in the paper is the relation between politics and administration. The authors try to answer if independent administration exists at the sub-national level in Poland. In a more detailed manner, the question is whether an acceptance of independent administration has been fostered by the dispersion of political power and the experience of participation in important decision-making processes. The data used in the article come from a survey of councillors and in-depth interviews with councillors and clerks. The analysis proved that the councillors’ opinions as to the independence of administration are influenced by their participation in the ruling majority. Opposition members support stricter, more stringent legislative oversight. Majority members, on the contrary, accept greater independence of administration. The result of the study leads also to a conclusion about the importance of monopolization and the influence on administration by the executive and the majority councillors. Administration becomes perceived as a functional part of the majority. A more fundamental conclusion is when there is no programmatic competition between political groupings of councillors, there are no conditions for establishing an administration independent of politics. This outcome completes the relationship noted by Miller and Whitford with the programmatic dimension of political competition.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254241229732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main problem addressed in the paper is the relation between politics and administration. The authors try to answer if independent administration exists at the sub-national level in Poland. In a more detailed manner, the question is whether an acceptance of independent administration has been fostered by the dispersion of political power and the experience of participation in important decision-making processes. The data used in the article come from a survey of councillors and in-depth interviews with councillors and clerks. The analysis proved that the councillors’ opinions as to the independence of administration are influenced by their participation in the ruling majority. Opposition members support stricter, more stringent legislative oversight. Majority members, on the contrary, accept greater independence of administration. The result of the study leads also to a conclusion about the importance of monopolization and the influence on administration by the executive and the majority councillors. Administration becomes perceived as a functional part of the majority. A more fundamental conclusion is when there is no programmatic competition between political groupings of councillors, there are no conditions for establishing an administration independent of politics. This outcome completes the relationship noted by Miller and Whitford with the programmatic dimension of political competition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家以下各级治理中的政治-行政关联:探讨波兰缺乏独立行政机构的问题
本文探讨的主要问题是政治与行政之间的关系。作者试图回答在波兰国家以下一级是否存在独立行政。更详细地说,问题是政治权力的分散和参与重要决策过程的经验是否促进了对独立行政的接受。文章中使用的数据来自对议员的调查以及对议员和书记员的深入访谈。分析表明,议员们对行政管理独立性的看法受到了他们参与执政多数派的影响。反对党成员支持更严格、更严密的立法监督。相反,多数派议员则接受更大的行政独立性。研究结果还得出了一个结论,即垄断的重要性以及行政部门和多数派议员对行政管理的影响。行政部门被视为多数派的职能部门。一个更基本的结论是,如果议员政治团体之间没有纲领性竞争,就不存在建立独立于政治的行政管理的条件。这一结果完善了米勒(Miller)和惠特福德(Whitford)所指出的与政治竞争的纲领性层面的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: East European Politics and Societies is an international journal that examines social, political, and economic issues in Eastern Europe. EEPS offers holistic coverage of the region - every country, from every discipline - ranging from detailed case studies through comparative analyses and theoretical issues. Contributors include not only western scholars but many from Eastern Europe itself. The Editorial Board is composed of a world-class panel of historians, political scientists, economists, and social scientists.
期刊最新文献
Expelled from the Fairytale: The Impact of the Dissident Legacy on Post-1989 Central European Politics Post-Dissident Politics and the “Liberal Consensus” in East-Central Europe after 1989 Václav Havel Posthumous Reclamation of a National Hero? An Arrested Dialectic: The National Past and (Post-)Dissident Catholic Moral Reasoning in Slovakia From Dissidence to Heroism: Constructing an Ideal Post-Communist Identity in the Czech Republic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1