Explaining attitudes toward South-South immigrants: The relevant roles of contact quality, similarity and social dominance orientation in a Chilean case
Rodrigo Landabur Ayala , Diego Ignacio Gallardo Mateluna , Adolfo Andrés González-González , Alfonso Urzúa Morales
{"title":"Explaining attitudes toward South-South immigrants: The relevant roles of contact quality, similarity and social dominance orientation in a Chilean case","authors":"Rodrigo Landabur Ayala , Diego Ignacio Gallardo Mateluna , Adolfo Andrés González-González , Alfonso Urzúa Morales","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The literature has examined individual predictors of attitudes toward immigrants, controlled by supra-individual variables, especially in European and North American countries. Nevertheless, this analysis has not been made using South-south migration communities. Thus, this study analyzed the individual predictors of the attitudes toward immigrants from Perú and Venezuela in a Chilean sample, controlling supra-individual variables. We used available data (N total = 956, composed of 599 and 357 for Peruvians and Venezuelans, respectively), considering seven predictors and three types of intergroup attitudes. The main results indicated that contact quality, similarity and social dominance orientation were related to almost all types of attitudes (symbolic threat, realistic threat and liking) toward both immigrant populations, except that similarity and dominance orientation were not associated with realistic threats and liking toward Venezuelans, respectively. The rest of the predictors, contact quantity, generalized trust, political orientation, and right-wing authoritarianism explained three or fewer types of attitudes toward both immigrant communities. We speculated about the reasons why contact quality, similarity and social dominance orientation were associated with more types of attitudes than the rest of the predictors, and the present model’s robustness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 101972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The literature has examined individual predictors of attitudes toward immigrants, controlled by supra-individual variables, especially in European and North American countries. Nevertheless, this analysis has not been made using South-south migration communities. Thus, this study analyzed the individual predictors of the attitudes toward immigrants from Perú and Venezuela in a Chilean sample, controlling supra-individual variables. We used available data (N total = 956, composed of 599 and 357 for Peruvians and Venezuelans, respectively), considering seven predictors and three types of intergroup attitudes. The main results indicated that contact quality, similarity and social dominance orientation were related to almost all types of attitudes (symbolic threat, realistic threat and liking) toward both immigrant populations, except that similarity and dominance orientation were not associated with realistic threats and liking toward Venezuelans, respectively. The rest of the predictors, contact quantity, generalized trust, political orientation, and right-wing authoritarianism explained three or fewer types of attitudes toward both immigrant communities. We speculated about the reasons why contact quality, similarity and social dominance orientation were associated with more types of attitudes than the rest of the predictors, and the present model’s robustness.
期刊介绍:
IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.