Struggling for the recognition of river rights: A case of hydrosocial territorialization of the Atrato River in Colombia

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104000
Liliana Mosquera-Guerrero , Tobias Krueger
{"title":"Struggling for the recognition of river rights: A case of hydrosocial territorialization of the Atrato River in Colombia","authors":"Liliana Mosquera-Guerrero ,&nbsp;Tobias Krueger","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article focuses on understanding the territorialization processes caused by the decision of the Constitutional Court in Colombia to grant rights to the Atrato River. Against the background of the social-ecological conflicts of extraction, contamination, and direct use of the river's resources, state actors, ethnic and campesinos communities, and social organizations are now required to comply with Sentence T-622/16 and actively work together. The case is approached by using the hydrosocial territory framework and analyzing how this resonates with the territorial pluralism of the region. Based on field interviews and secondary data and documents from the first five years of implementation of the Sentence, we discuss how the Sentence defines a new hydrosocial imaginary around the collective territories of ethnic communities that we call territories-in-territory. We conclude by outlining the implementation struggles of Sentence T-622, especially those related to the requirement of participatory processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000617/pdfft?md5=bb1e9663f9d3956439a6fa05447b4deb&pid=1-s2.0-S0016718524000617-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524000617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on understanding the territorialization processes caused by the decision of the Constitutional Court in Colombia to grant rights to the Atrato River. Against the background of the social-ecological conflicts of extraction, contamination, and direct use of the river's resources, state actors, ethnic and campesinos communities, and social organizations are now required to comply with Sentence T-622/16 and actively work together. The case is approached by using the hydrosocial territory framework and analyzing how this resonates with the territorial pluralism of the region. Based on field interviews and secondary data and documents from the first five years of implementation of the Sentence, we discuss how the Sentence defines a new hydrosocial imaginary around the collective territories of ethnic communities that we call territories-in-territory. We conclude by outlining the implementation struggles of Sentence T-622, especially those related to the requirement of participatory processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为承认河流权利而斗争:哥伦比亚阿特拉托河的水社会领土化案例
本文重点介绍哥伦比亚宪法法院授予阿特拉托河权利的判决所引发的领土化进程。在开采、污染和直接使用河流资源的社会生态冲突背景下,国家行为者、少数民族和农民社区以及社会组织现在必须遵守第 T-622/16 号判决,并积极合作。本案例采用了水文社会领地框架,并分析了该框架如何与该地区的领地多元化产生共鸣。根据实地访谈、二手数据以及该判决实施头五年的文件,我们讨论了该判决如何围绕少数民族社区的集体领地(我们称之为 "领地中的领地")定义了一种新的水社会想象。最后,我们概述了 T-622 号判决在实施过程中遇到的困难,特别是与参与进程要求有关的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Winds of change – Nomadic grassroots innovations in the maritime shipping sector Retreat or resist: Navigating uncertainties in pastoral Amdo Tibet, China Resilient queer subjects: Lesbian, bisexual, and transgender women on the Israeli periphery Sense of place and micro-business vulnerability to extreme weather in China Conceptualizing labor agency through resilience: Practices of reassembling work on domestic services platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1