A systematic review of predictor screening methods for downscaling of numerical climate models

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth-Science Reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104773
Aida Hosseini Baghanam , Vahid Nourani , Mohammad Bejani , Hadi Pourali , Sameh Ahmed Kantoush , Yongqiang Zhang
{"title":"A systematic review of predictor screening methods for downscaling of numerical climate models","authors":"Aida Hosseini Baghanam ,&nbsp;Vahid Nourani ,&nbsp;Mohammad Bejani ,&nbsp;Hadi Pourali ,&nbsp;Sameh Ahmed Kantoush ,&nbsp;Yongqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Effective selection of climate predictors is a fundamental aspect of climate modeling research. Predictor Screening (PS) plays a crucial role in identifying regional climate drivers, reducing noise, expediting convergence, and minimizing time consumption, ultimately leading to the development of robust models. This review delves into the complex landscape of PS techniques within the context of Numerical Climate Modeling (NCM), with a specific focus on their applicability across various Köppen climate classifications and PS model structures. The analysis revealed substantial variations in the performance of PS methods, shedding light on their ability to capture –and prioritize predictors related to precipitation and temperature within distinct climate contexts. Furthermore, the provided methods have been categorized into two subsections: Feature Selection (FS) and Feature Extraction (FE), with FS encompassing filter, wrapper, embedded, and ensemble/hybrid techniques, and FE covering Linear Feature Extraction (LFE), Time-Domain Analysis (TDA), deep learning, and clustering methods. The initial compilation of papers, acquired through a keyword search on Scopus, consisted of 3650 documents. Following a meticulous evaluation process, 206 papers were identified as fitting for inclusion in the literature review, covering the time frame from 1974 to November 3, 2023. In conclusion, the results provide a detailed understanding of the strengths and limitations of each approach, establishing a hierarchy of effectiveness contingent upon the specific climate context. Additionally, insights into promising avenues for future research in this field are offered. This review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) standard as its foundation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224001004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective selection of climate predictors is a fundamental aspect of climate modeling research. Predictor Screening (PS) plays a crucial role in identifying regional climate drivers, reducing noise, expediting convergence, and minimizing time consumption, ultimately leading to the development of robust models. This review delves into the complex landscape of PS techniques within the context of Numerical Climate Modeling (NCM), with a specific focus on their applicability across various Köppen climate classifications and PS model structures. The analysis revealed substantial variations in the performance of PS methods, shedding light on their ability to capture –and prioritize predictors related to precipitation and temperature within distinct climate contexts. Furthermore, the provided methods have been categorized into two subsections: Feature Selection (FS) and Feature Extraction (FE), with FS encompassing filter, wrapper, embedded, and ensemble/hybrid techniques, and FE covering Linear Feature Extraction (LFE), Time-Domain Analysis (TDA), deep learning, and clustering methods. The initial compilation of papers, acquired through a keyword search on Scopus, consisted of 3650 documents. Following a meticulous evaluation process, 206 papers were identified as fitting for inclusion in the literature review, covering the time frame from 1974 to November 3, 2023. In conclusion, the results provide a detailed understanding of the strengths and limitations of each approach, establishing a hierarchy of effectiveness contingent upon the specific climate context. Additionally, insights into promising avenues for future research in this field are offered. This review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) standard as its foundation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对数值气候模型降尺度预测筛选方法的系统审查
有效选择气候预测因子是气候建模研究的一个基本方面。预测因子筛选(Predictor Screening,PS)在识别区域气候驱动因子、减少噪声、加速收敛和最小化时间消耗等方面发挥着至关重要的作用,并最终促成稳健模型的开发。本综述深入探讨了数值气候建模(NCM)背景下预测因子筛选技术的复杂情况,特别关注其在各种柯本气候分类和预测因子筛选模型结构中的适用性。分析结果表明,PS 方法的性能存在很大差异,说明了这些方法在不同气候背景下捕捉降水和温度相关预测因子并对其进行优先排序的能力。此外,所提供的方法还分为两个子部分:特征选择(FS)和特征提取(FE),FS 包括过滤、包装、嵌入和集合/混合技术,FE 包括线性特征提取(LFE)、时域分析(TDA)、深度学习和聚类方法。最初的论文汇编是通过在 Scopus 上进行关键词搜索获得的,共有 3650 篇文献。经过缜密的评估过程,206 篇论文被确定为适合纳入文献综述,时间跨度从 1974 年到 2023 年 11 月 3 日。总之,研究结果提供了对每种方法的优势和局限性的详细了解,并根据具体的气候环境确定了有效性等级。此外,还对该领域未来研究的前景提出了见解。本综述以 PRISMA(系统综述和 Meta 分析首选报告项目)标准为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
期刊最新文献
How many oceans closed during the Brasiliano Cycle in northeastern Brazil? Implications for the amalgamation of western Gondwana Mechanics of methane bubbles in consolidated aquatic muds Reply to Discussion: “Haiyang Zhang and Muhammad Arif. Residual trapping capacity of subsurface systems for geological storage of CO2: Measurement techniques, meta-analysis of influencing factors, and future outlook. Earth-Science Reviews (2024): 104764.” Quantifying the pattern of organic carbon burial through Cretaceous Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 The uplift of the East Africa - Arabia swell
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1