Incivility: How tourists cope with relative deprivation

IF 7.3 2区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Tourism Management Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101246
Li Pan (潘莉) , Wengu Ren (任文顾) , Ruizhe Fang (方睿哲)
{"title":"Incivility: How tourists cope with relative deprivation","authors":"Li Pan (潘莉) ,&nbsp;Wengu Ren (任文顾) ,&nbsp;Ruizhe Fang (方睿哲)","doi":"10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tourist incivility exacerbates tension with locals, jeopardizes tourism sustainability, and tarnishes destination image, prompting investigations into its causes. Leveraging relative deprivation theory, this study examined how two types of relative deprivation influence tourist incivility via a pretest and three scenario-based experiments. Experiments 1a and 1b indicated that relative deprivation increased uncivil behavioral intentions, with economic relative deprivation being more influential than social relative deprivation. Experiment 2 revealed the mediating roles of the psychological needs for self-protection and self-compensation. This study extended relative deprivation theory in the tourism context by focusing on two distinct components. Tourism stakeholders may mitigate uncivil behavior by aligning their offerings with tourists' expenditures and cater to their psychological and emotional needs with adequately equal respect and courtesy. Tourism providers may also offer avenues for tourists to release negative emotions and reverse their defensive motives, reducing the likelihood of incivility during service failures or conflicts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48141,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Management Perspectives","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 101246"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Management Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211973624000291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tourist incivility exacerbates tension with locals, jeopardizes tourism sustainability, and tarnishes destination image, prompting investigations into its causes. Leveraging relative deprivation theory, this study examined how two types of relative deprivation influence tourist incivility via a pretest and three scenario-based experiments. Experiments 1a and 1b indicated that relative deprivation increased uncivil behavioral intentions, with economic relative deprivation being more influential than social relative deprivation. Experiment 2 revealed the mediating roles of the psychological needs for self-protection and self-compensation. This study extended relative deprivation theory in the tourism context by focusing on two distinct components. Tourism stakeholders may mitigate uncivil behavior by aligning their offerings with tourists' expenditures and cater to their psychological and emotional needs with adequately equal respect and courtesy. Tourism providers may also offer avenues for tourists to release negative emotions and reverse their defensive motives, reducing the likelihood of incivility during service failures or conflicts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不文明行为:游客如何应对相对匮乏的环境
游客的不文明行为加剧了与当地人的紧张关系,危及旅游业的可持续发展,并玷污了旅游目的地的形象,这促使人们对其成因展开调查。本研究利用相对剥夺理论,通过前测和三个情景实验,研究了两种相对剥夺如何影响游客不文明行为。实验 1a 和 1b 表明,相对剥夺增加了不文明行为意向,其中经济相对剥夺比社会相对剥夺的影响更大。实验 2 揭示了自我保护和自我补偿心理需求的中介作用。本研究通过关注两个不同的组成部分,将相对剥夺理论延伸到了旅游业中。旅游利益相关者可以通过使其提供的服务与游客的支出相一致,并以充分平等的尊重和礼貌来满足游客的心理和情感需求,从而减少不文明行为。旅游供应商还可以为游客提供释放负面情绪和扭转防御动机的途径,从而降低服务失败或冲突中出现不文明行为的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
99
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Tourism Management Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the planning and management of travel and tourism. It covers topics such as tourist experiences, their consequences for communities, economies, and environments, the creation of image, the shaping of tourist experiences and perceptions, and the management of tourist organizations and destinations. The journal's editorial board consists of experienced international professionals and it shares the board with Tourism Management. The journal covers socio-cultural, technological, planning, and policy aspects of international, national, and regional tourism, as well as specific management studies. It encourages papers that introduce new research methods and critique existing ones in the context of tourism research. The journal publishes empirical research articles and high-quality review articles on important topics and emerging themes that enhance the theoretical and conceptual understanding of key areas within travel and tourism management.
期刊最新文献
The festival industry and gender inequality: The case of Edinburgh, the world's leading festival city Platform-enabled innovation adoption in the tourism sector: A case study on Booking.com Group conflict and group harmony affect future female companion travel intentions: The mediating effect of female companion travel experience Children's learning processes in family travel: A narrative review through a social cognitive lens Unlocking the helpfulness of extreme and exaggerated hotel online reviews: Consumers and brand influences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1