A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions

IF 3.2 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1109/OAJPE.2024.3384354
Chalitha Liyanage;Inam Nutkani;Lasantha Meegahapola
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions","authors":"Chalitha Liyanage;Inam Nutkani;Lasantha Meegahapola","doi":"10.1109/OAJPE.2024.3384354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The virtual synchronous generator (VSG) is the most widely used grid-forming inverter (GFMI) control technique. The VSG can provide enhanced ancillary services and improved dynamic response compared to conventional synchronous generators and grid-following inverters (GFLIs). Developing an improved understanding of VSG strategies is vital to deploy them in the appropriate context in power grids. Therefore, this paper provides a rigorous comparative performance analysis of prominent VSG strategies (e.g., ISE-Lab, synchronverter, Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) model, and power synchronisation control (PSC)) under different network conditions (e.g., X/R ratios, network faults, and load types). Dynamic simulation studies have been carried out using a simplified test system to assess the performance of VSG models. Furthermore, comprehensive mathematical models of VSGs have been derived in order to verify the simulation results through a frequency domain stability analysis. Moreover, the offline simulation platform results have been validated in real-time using the IEEE-39 bus network on the OPAL-RT platform. According to the analysis, the synchronverter-based VSGs perform much better under low X/R ratios, fault conditions, and dynamic loads. Hence, they are more suitable for distribution grids and load centres with a high share of dynamic loads.","PeriodicalId":56187,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy","volume":"11 ","pages":"178-195"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10488377","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10488377/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The virtual synchronous generator (VSG) is the most widely used grid-forming inverter (GFMI) control technique. The VSG can provide enhanced ancillary services and improved dynamic response compared to conventional synchronous generators and grid-following inverters (GFLIs). Developing an improved understanding of VSG strategies is vital to deploy them in the appropriate context in power grids. Therefore, this paper provides a rigorous comparative performance analysis of prominent VSG strategies (e.g., ISE-Lab, synchronverter, Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) model, and power synchronisation control (PSC)) under different network conditions (e.g., X/R ratios, network faults, and load types). Dynamic simulation studies have been carried out using a simplified test system to assess the performance of VSG models. Furthermore, comprehensive mathematical models of VSGs have been derived in order to verify the simulation results through a frequency domain stability analysis. Moreover, the offline simulation platform results have been validated in real-time using the IEEE-39 bus network on the OPAL-RT platform. According to the analysis, the synchronverter-based VSGs perform much better under low X/R ratios, fault conditions, and dynamic loads. Hence, they are more suitable for distribution grids and load centres with a high share of dynamic loads.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同网络条件下著名虚拟同步发电机策略的比较分析
虚拟同步发电机(VSG)是应用最广泛的并网逆变器(GFMI)控制技术。与传统的同步发电机和电网跟随逆变器(GFLIs)相比,虚拟同步发电机可提供更强的辅助服务和更好的动态响应。加深对 VSG 策略的理解对于在电网中适当部署 VSG 至关重要。因此,本文对不同网络条件(如 X/R 比、网络故障和负载类型)下的主要 VSG 策略(如 ISE-Lab、同步逆变器、川崎重工 (KHI) 模型和电力同步控制 (PSC))进行了严格的性能比较分析。我们使用简化的测试系统进行了动态模拟研究,以评估 VSG 模型的性能。此外,还推导出了 VSG 的综合数学模型,以便通过频域稳定性分析来验证仿真结果。此外,离线仿真平台的结果还通过 OPAL-RT 平台上的 IEEE-39 总线网络进行了实时验证。分析结果表明,基于同步逆变器的 VSG 在低 X/R 比、故障条件和动态负载下的性能要好得多。因此,它们更适用于动态负载比例较高的配电网和负载中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
45
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Management Strategies for a Battery Participating in Day Ahead and Primary Reserve Markets Under Uncertainties Differential Predictive Control of Residential Building HVACs for Enhancing Renewable Local Consumption and Supporting Fast Voltage Control Dynamic Validation of CNN-Based Surrogate Models for Inverter-Based Resources in Open-Source Solvers Hybrid Symbolic-Numerical Modeling and Parametric Stability Analysis of DC–AC Power Systems A Measurement-Driven Digital-Twin Methodology for Flexible Loads Voltage Control in Unknown Grids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1