Unlocking the power of global collaboration: Building a stronger evidence ecosystem together

IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Campbell Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1002/cl2.1401
Zoe Jordan, Vivian Welch, Karla Soares-Weiser
{"title":"Unlocking the power of global collaboration: Building a stronger evidence ecosystem together","authors":"Zoe Jordan,&nbsp;Vivian Welch,&nbsp;Karla Soares-Weiser","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Across the global evidence ecosystem, numerous organizations share a common vision and mission: to promote evidence-based decision-making worldwide. These organizations, including JBI, the Cochrane Collaboration, and the Campbell Collaboration, have each made an indelible imprint on the evidence-based movement and have been identified as “a crucial mechanism to facilitate the synthesis, transfer, and implementation of evidence into health care policy and practice” (Pilla et al., <span>2022</span>, p. 211). While the benefits of global collaboration have been well established for some time, achieving impact at scale will require a fundamental shift in mindset.</p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic marked a turning point for evidence-based health care and decision-making. It provided a unique context whereby policymakers, health care providers, researchers, and the public required immediate access to trustworthy evidence to make decisions. We collectively faced major challenges in translating a rapidly evolving body of new evidence into tangible response efforts, with health policy decisions receiving unprecedented public attention. The “stress test” of COVID-19, and the many post-pandemic initiatives that followed, highlighted the need for more effective strategies, institutional mechanisms, and capacities to systematically mobilize and contextualize the best available evidence for rapid decision-making for effective and equitable public health responses (Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges, <span>2022</span>; Stibbe &amp; Prescott, <span>2022</span>; World Health Organization Evidence-informed Policy Network [EVIPNet], <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Each of our organizations responded to COVID-19 in different ways and were able to provide access to reliable evidence. Yet, it is essential to acknowledge the challenges of sustaining funding, upholding methodological rigor, and ensuring diversity and inclusivity in our collective endeavors. Our demonstrated success in enhancing global health care, education, and social policy underscores the value of collaborative, evidence-based approaches in addressing the world's most pressing challenges.</p><p>We find ourselves at a unique juncture where our respective global collaborative evidence networks (JBI, Cochrane, and Campbell) must reimagine the way we work together to facilitate and engage in multidisciplinary, transdisciplinary, and interdisciplinary research, dissemination, knowledge sharing, and knowledge translation to generate impact at scale across the evidence ecosystem. It is time to develop interagency collaboration as a coherent program rather than a series of standalone efforts. There is significant potential in our ability to orchestrate, integrate, coordinate, and align our activities to identify opportunities for mutual benefit, learning, and impact.</p><p>One of the most significant benefits of our respective global networks is our capacity to transcend geographic boundaries. By facilitating better global interagency collaboration, we enable the pooling of expertise and knowledge in the field of evidence-based practice, and the result is a more holistic and nuanced understanding of complex issues, leading to improved decision-making at both local and global levels. Examples of this may include much deeper collaboration on methodologies and standards for synthesis that reflect the diversity of evidence to respond to global challenges; a more coordinated approach to the prioritization of synthesis efforts to avoid duplication of effort; and better, more meaningful partnership on the contextualization or localization of evidence for policy and practice.</p><p>Going forward, it is incumbent upon us to support and strengthen our networks and the relationships between them, recognizing the invaluable contributions we can collectively make to improving the well-being of individuals and communities around the world. The path to a brighter, more evidence-based future lies in continued collaboration and our unwavering commitment to the delivery of trustworthy evidence. Collaboration <i>across</i> our global networks, not just within them, is now not merely a choice but a necessity in our increasingly interconnected world.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1401","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across the global evidence ecosystem, numerous organizations share a common vision and mission: to promote evidence-based decision-making worldwide. These organizations, including JBI, the Cochrane Collaboration, and the Campbell Collaboration, have each made an indelible imprint on the evidence-based movement and have been identified as “a crucial mechanism to facilitate the synthesis, transfer, and implementation of evidence into health care policy and practice” (Pilla et al., 2022, p. 211). While the benefits of global collaboration have been well established for some time, achieving impact at scale will require a fundamental shift in mindset.

The COVID-19 pandemic marked a turning point for evidence-based health care and decision-making. It provided a unique context whereby policymakers, health care providers, researchers, and the public required immediate access to trustworthy evidence to make decisions. We collectively faced major challenges in translating a rapidly evolving body of new evidence into tangible response efforts, with health policy decisions receiving unprecedented public attention. The “stress test” of COVID-19, and the many post-pandemic initiatives that followed, highlighted the need for more effective strategies, institutional mechanisms, and capacities to systematically mobilize and contextualize the best available evidence for rapid decision-making for effective and equitable public health responses (Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges, 2022; Stibbe & Prescott, 2022; World Health Organization Evidence-informed Policy Network [EVIPNet], 2021).

Each of our organizations responded to COVID-19 in different ways and were able to provide access to reliable evidence. Yet, it is essential to acknowledge the challenges of sustaining funding, upholding methodological rigor, and ensuring diversity and inclusivity in our collective endeavors. Our demonstrated success in enhancing global health care, education, and social policy underscores the value of collaborative, evidence-based approaches in addressing the world's most pressing challenges.

We find ourselves at a unique juncture where our respective global collaborative evidence networks (JBI, Cochrane, and Campbell) must reimagine the way we work together to facilitate and engage in multidisciplinary, transdisciplinary, and interdisciplinary research, dissemination, knowledge sharing, and knowledge translation to generate impact at scale across the evidence ecosystem. It is time to develop interagency collaboration as a coherent program rather than a series of standalone efforts. There is significant potential in our ability to orchestrate, integrate, coordinate, and align our activities to identify opportunities for mutual benefit, learning, and impact.

One of the most significant benefits of our respective global networks is our capacity to transcend geographic boundaries. By facilitating better global interagency collaboration, we enable the pooling of expertise and knowledge in the field of evidence-based practice, and the result is a more holistic and nuanced understanding of complex issues, leading to improved decision-making at both local and global levels. Examples of this may include much deeper collaboration on methodologies and standards for synthesis that reflect the diversity of evidence to respond to global challenges; a more coordinated approach to the prioritization of synthesis efforts to avoid duplication of effort; and better, more meaningful partnership on the contextualization or localization of evidence for policy and practice.

Going forward, it is incumbent upon us to support and strengthen our networks and the relationships between them, recognizing the invaluable contributions we can collectively make to improving the well-being of individuals and communities around the world. The path to a brighter, more evidence-based future lies in continued collaboration and our unwavering commitment to the delivery of trustworthy evidence. Collaboration across our global networks, not just within them, is now not merely a choice but a necessity in our increasingly interconnected world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
释放全球合作的力量:共建更强大的证据生态系统
在全球循证生态系统中,众多组织有着共同的愿景和使命:在全球范围内促进循证决策。包括 JBI、科克伦合作组织和坎贝尔合作组织在内的这些组织都在循证运动中留下了不可磨灭的印记,并被认为是 "促进证据的综合、转移以及将证据应用到医疗政策和实践中的重要机制"(Pilla et al.)虽然全球合作的益处早已得到证实,但要实现大规模的影响,还需要从根本上转变观念。COVID-19 大流行标志着循证医疗保健和决策的转折点。它提供了一个独特的环境,政策制定者、医疗服务提供者、研究人员和公众需要立即获得可信的证据来做出决策。我们共同面临着将快速发展的新证据转化为切实可行的应对措施的重大挑战,同时卫生政策决策也受到了前所未有的公众关注。COVID-19 的 "压力测试 "以及随后的许多大流行后倡议,都强调了需要更有效的战略、机构机制和能力,以系统地调动和结合现有最佳证据,为有效和公平的公共卫生应对措施做出快速决策(应对社会挑战证据全球委员会,2022 年;Stibbe &;Prescott,2022 年;世界卫生组织循证政策网络 [EVIPNet],2021 年)。我们每个组织都以不同的方式响应 COVID-19,并能够提供可靠的证据。然而,我们必须承认,在我们的集体努力中,面临着持续提供资金、坚持方法的严谨性以及确保多样性和包容性的挑战。我们在加强全球医疗保健、教育和社会政策方面所取得的成功强调了以证据为基础的合作方法在应对世界最紧迫挑战中的价值。我们发现自己正处于一个独特的关口,我们各自的全球合作证据网络(JBI、Cochrane 和 Campbell)必须重新规划我们的合作方式,以促进和参与多学科、跨学科和跨学科研究、传播、知识共享和知识转化,从而在整个证据生态系统中产生大规模影响。现在是时候将机构间合作发展成为一项连贯的计划,而不是一系列独立的工作。我们有能力统筹、整合、协调和调整我们的活动,以确定互惠互利、学习和影响的机会,这其中蕴含着巨大的潜力。通过促进更好的全球机构间合作,我们能够汇集循证实践领域的专长和知识,从而对复杂问题有更全面、更细致的了解,从而改进地方和全球层面的决策。这方面的例子可能包括:在反映证据多样性的综合方法和标准方面进行更深入的合作,以应对全球挑战;在确定综合工作的优先次序方面采取更协调的方法,以避免重复劳动;在政策和实践证据的背景化或本地化方面建立更好、更有意义的伙伴关系。通往更加光明、更加以证据为基础的未来的道路在于持续合作和我们对提供可信证据的坚定承诺。在我们这个相互联系日益紧密的世界里,在我们的全球网络之间而不仅仅是在网络内部开展合作,现在已不仅仅是一种选择,而是一种必然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Critical appraisal of methodological quality and completeness of reporting in Chinese social science systematic reviews with meta-analysis: A systematic review. The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for reducing problematic substance use, mental ill health, and housing instability in people experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exposure to hate in online and traditional media: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of this exposure on individuals and communities. PROTOCOL: Non-criminal justice interventions for countering cognitive and behavioural radicalisation amongst children and adolescents: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation. Protocol: The impact of integrated thematic instruction model on primary and secondary school students compared to standard teaching: A protocol of systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1