The Public Purposes of Private Education: a Civic Outcomes Meta-Analysis

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Educational Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-04-14 DOI:10.1007/s10648-024-09874-1
M. Danish Shakeel, Patrick J. Wolf, Alison Heape Johnson, Mattie A. Harris, Sarah R. Morris
{"title":"The Public Purposes of Private Education: a Civic Outcomes Meta-Analysis","authors":"M. Danish Shakeel, Patrick J. Wolf, Alison Heape Johnson, Mattie A. Harris, Sarah R. Morris","doi":"10.1007/s10648-024-09874-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since Plato and Aristotle, political theorists have discussed the important role of education in forming democratic citizens. They disagree, however, over whether public or private schools are more effective at nurturing citizenship. We conduct a statistical meta-analysis to identify the average association between private schooling and measures of four central civic outcomes: political tolerance, political participation, civic knowledge and skills, and voluntarism and social capital. Our search identifies 13,301 initial target studies, ultimately yielding 531 effects from 57 qualified studies drawing from 40 different databases. Using Robust Variance Estimation, we determine that, on average, private schooling boosts any civic outcome by 0.055 standard deviations over public schooling. Religious private schooling, particularly, is strongly associated with positive civic outcomes. The evidence is especially strong that private schooling is correlated with higher levels of political tolerance and political knowledge and skills. We discuss heterogeneities, robustness checks, and implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"170 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09874-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since Plato and Aristotle, political theorists have discussed the important role of education in forming democratic citizens. They disagree, however, over whether public or private schools are more effective at nurturing citizenship. We conduct a statistical meta-analysis to identify the average association between private schooling and measures of four central civic outcomes: political tolerance, political participation, civic knowledge and skills, and voluntarism and social capital. Our search identifies 13,301 initial target studies, ultimately yielding 531 effects from 57 qualified studies drawing from 40 different databases. Using Robust Variance Estimation, we determine that, on average, private schooling boosts any civic outcome by 0.055 standard deviations over public schooling. Religious private schooling, particularly, is strongly associated with positive civic outcomes. The evidence is especially strong that private schooling is correlated with higher levels of political tolerance and political knowledge and skills. We discuss heterogeneities, robustness checks, and implications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私立教育的公共目的:公民成果元分析
自柏拉图和亚里士多德以来,政治理论家们一直在讨论教育在培养民主公民方面的重要作用。然而,在培养公民意识方面,公立学校还是私立学校更有效的问题上,他们意见不一。我们进行了一项统计荟萃分析,以确定私立学校教育与以下四项核心公民成果之间的平均关联:政治宽容、政治参与、公民知识和技能以及志愿精神和社会资本。我们的搜索确定了 13,301 项初始目标研究,最终从来自 40 个不同数据库的 57 项合格研究中得出了 531 项效应。通过稳健方差估计法(Robust Variance Estimation),我们得出结论:平均而言,与公立学校教育相比,私立学校教育可使任何公民教育结果提高 0.055 个标准差。尤其是宗教私立学校教育,与积极的公民成果密切相关。特别有力的证据表明,私立学校教育与较高的政治宽容度以及政治知识和技能水平相关。我们将讨论异质性、稳健性检验和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
The Distorting Influence of Primacy Effects on Reporting Cognitive Load in Learning Materials of Varying Complexity Inhibitory Control and Mathematical Ability in Elementary School Children: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis A Scoping Review of the Associations Between Sense of Belonging and Academic Outcomes in Postsecondary Education Harnessing Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Regulation: Dale H. Schunk’s Enduring Influence On Being Accepted: Interrogating How University Cultural Scripts Shape Personal and Political Facets of Belonging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1