Assessing the predictability of fungicide resistance evolution through in vitro selection

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s41348-024-00906-0
Nichola J. Hawkins
{"title":"Assessing the predictability of fungicide resistance evolution through in vitro selection","authors":"Nichola J. Hawkins","doi":"10.1007/s41348-024-00906-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plant pathogens are highly adaptable, and have evolved to overcome control measures including multiple classes of fungicides. More effective management requires a thorough understanding of the evolutionary drivers leading to resistance. Experimental evolution can be used to investigate evolutionary processes over a compressed timescale. For fungicide resistance, applications include predicting resistance ahead of its emergence in the field, testing potential outcomes under multiple different fungicide usage scenarios or comparing resistance management strategies. This review considers different experimental approaches to in vitro selection, and their suitability for addressing different questions relating to fungicide resistance. When aiming to predict the evolution of new variants, mutational supply is especially important. When assessing the relative fitness of different variants under fungicide selection, growth conditions such as temperature may affect the results as well as fungicide choice and dose. Other considerations include population size, transfer interval, competition between genotypes and pathogen reproductive mode. However, resistance evolution in field populations has proven to be less repeatable for some fungicide classes than others. Therefore, even with optimal experimental design, in some cases the most accurate prediction from experimental evolution may be that the exact evolutionary trajectory of resistance will be unpredictable.</p>","PeriodicalId":16838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection","volume":"16 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00906-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant pathogens are highly adaptable, and have evolved to overcome control measures including multiple classes of fungicides. More effective management requires a thorough understanding of the evolutionary drivers leading to resistance. Experimental evolution can be used to investigate evolutionary processes over a compressed timescale. For fungicide resistance, applications include predicting resistance ahead of its emergence in the field, testing potential outcomes under multiple different fungicide usage scenarios or comparing resistance management strategies. This review considers different experimental approaches to in vitro selection, and their suitability for addressing different questions relating to fungicide resistance. When aiming to predict the evolution of new variants, mutational supply is especially important. When assessing the relative fitness of different variants under fungicide selection, growth conditions such as temperature may affect the results as well as fungicide choice and dose. Other considerations include population size, transfer interval, competition between genotypes and pathogen reproductive mode. However, resistance evolution in field populations has proven to be less repeatable for some fungicide classes than others. Therefore, even with optimal experimental design, in some cases the most accurate prediction from experimental evolution may be that the exact evolutionary trajectory of resistance will be unpredictable.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过体外选择评估杀菌剂抗药性演变的可预测性
植物病原体具有很强的适应性,在进化过程中克服了包括多种杀菌剂在内的控制措施。要进行更有效的管理,就必须彻底了解导致抗药性的进化驱动因素。实验进化可用于研究压缩时间范围内的进化过程。对于杀真菌剂抗性,其应用包括在田间出现抗性之前预测抗性、测试多种不同杀真菌剂使用情况下的潜在结果或比较抗性管理策略。本综述探讨了体外选择的不同实验方法,以及这些方法是否适合解决与杀真菌剂抗性有关的不同问题。在预测新变种的进化时,突变供应尤为重要。在评估杀真菌剂选择下不同变种的相对适应性时,温度等生长条件可能会影响结果,杀真菌剂的选择和剂量也会影响结果。其他考虑因素还包括种群规模、转移间隔、基因型之间的竞争以及病原体的繁殖模式。然而,事实证明,田间种群的抗性进化对某些杀菌剂类别的可重复性比对其他杀菌剂类别的可重复性要低。因此,即使有最佳的实验设计,在某些情况下,实验进化的最准确预测可能是抗性的确切进化轨迹将是不可预测的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection (JPDP) is an international scientific journal that publishes original research articles, reviews, short communications, position and opinion papers dealing with applied scientific aspects of plant pathology, plant health, plant protection and findings on newly occurring diseases and pests. "Special Issues" on coherent themes often arising from International Conferences are offered.
期刊最新文献
Improved methodology for the efficient isolation of viable Meloidogyne incognita eggs Exploring the interaction between aminobutyric acid and epigenetics in modulating ash dieback response in european ash (Fraxinus excelsior) Recruitment and retention of predatory coccinellid beetle, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fab.) using synthetic semiochemicals Emerging strategies in plant virus disease control: insights from the 56th meeting of the DPG working group “Viruskrankheiten der Pflanzen” Identification of full-sibling families from natural single-tree ash progenies based on SSR markers and genome-wide SNPs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1