Adaptation of the Communities That Care Youth Survey for Use in Estonia: A Pilot Study

{"title":"Adaptation of the Communities That Care Youth Survey for Use in Estonia: A Pilot Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10935-024-00777-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>The Communities That Care Youth Survey (CTCYS) assesses risk and protective factors, predicting a range of behavioural health problems, including substance use, violence, and delinquency. Although the survey has been adapted to other contexts and languages, further studies on cross‐cultural adaptations, particularly in non‐English speaking countries, are needed. In 2022, CTCYS was adapted for Estonia, incorporating 38 risk and protective factors, along with measures of substance use, antisocial behaviour, mental health problems, and self-harm. This study investigated the psychometric properties and applicability of the CTCYS in Estonia. The adaptation process involved translating and refining the US CTCYS, followed by focus group discussions with students and specialists and a pilot study in two municipalities, with data obtained from 265 students. A focus group with municipality members explored the measure’s feasibility. Results indicate that the original CTC framework largely captures key issues within the Estonian context. Overall, the survey showed good validity, as evidenced by its ability to predict problem outcomes through both risk and protective factors. Regarding reliability, with the removal of one item, internal consistency reached acceptable levels for all but eight risk and protective factor subscales. The most problematic scales in the Estonian context were Prosocial Involvement, Social Skills, and Belief in the Moral Order. Municipality members perceived the measure as useful but highlighted some challenges regarding its practicality and comprehensibility. It became clear that other elements are needed to effectively support communities in using the CTCYS results for preventive efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":501695,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Primary Prevention","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Primary Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-024-00777-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Communities That Care Youth Survey (CTCYS) assesses risk and protective factors, predicting a range of behavioural health problems, including substance use, violence, and delinquency. Although the survey has been adapted to other contexts and languages, further studies on cross‐cultural adaptations, particularly in non‐English speaking countries, are needed. In 2022, CTCYS was adapted for Estonia, incorporating 38 risk and protective factors, along with measures of substance use, antisocial behaviour, mental health problems, and self-harm. This study investigated the psychometric properties and applicability of the CTCYS in Estonia. The adaptation process involved translating and refining the US CTCYS, followed by focus group discussions with students and specialists and a pilot study in two municipalities, with data obtained from 265 students. A focus group with municipality members explored the measure’s feasibility. Results indicate that the original CTC framework largely captures key issues within the Estonian context. Overall, the survey showed good validity, as evidenced by its ability to predict problem outcomes through both risk and protective factors. Regarding reliability, with the removal of one item, internal consistency reached acceptable levels for all but eight risk and protective factor subscales. The most problematic scales in the Estonian context were Prosocial Involvement, Social Skills, and Belief in the Moral Order. Municipality members perceived the measure as useful but highlighted some challenges regarding its practicality and comprehensibility. It became clear that other elements are needed to effectively support communities in using the CTCYS results for preventive efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将 "关爱社区 "青年调查改编为在爱沙尼亚使用:试点研究
摘要 关爱青少年社区调查(CTCYS)评估风险和保护因素,预测一系列行为健康问题,包括药物使用、暴力和犯罪。尽管该调查已被调整到其他环境和语言中,但仍需进一步研究跨文化调整,特别是在非英语国家。2022 年,爱沙尼亚对 CTCYS 进行了改编,纳入了 38 个风险和保护因素,以及对药物使用、反社会行为、心理健康问题和自我伤害的测量。本研究调查了 CTCYS 在爱沙尼亚的心理计量特性和适用性。改编过程包括翻译和完善美国的 CTCYS,然后与学生和专家进行焦点小组讨论,并在两个城市进行试点研究,从 265 名学生那里获得数据。与市政府成员组成的焦点小组探讨了该措施的可行性。结果表明,最初的 CTC 框架在很大程度上抓住了爱沙尼亚背景下的关键问题。总体而言,调查显示出良好的有效性,这体现在它能够通过风险因素和保护因素来预测问题的结果。在可靠性方面,在去掉一个项目后,除八个风险和保护因素分量表外,其他所有分量表的内部一致性都达到了可接受的水平。在爱沙尼亚,最有问题的量表是 "亲社会参与"、"社会技能 "和 "对道德秩序的信仰"。市政成员认为这项措施很有用,但强调了其实用性和可理解性方面的一些挑战。显然,还需要其他要素来有效支持社区利用 CTCYS 的结果开展预防工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preventing Child Sexual Abuse and the Use of Child Sexual Abuse Materials: Following up on the German Prevention Project Dunkelfeld Process Evaluation and Investigation of Cultural Adaptations for an Online Parent-Based Intervention Using a Mixed-Method Approach Social Inequalities in Child Development: Analysis of Low-Birth-Weight Trends in Brazil, 2010–2020 Preventing Sexual Harassment in Higher Education: A Framework for Prevention Science Program Development Multi-sector Development of Measures and Interventions to Prevent New Smokers Among Youths Living in Underprivileged Housing Projects in Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1