Three‐dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiography is superior to two‐dimensional single‐shot magnetic resonance cholangiography for visualization and image quality of the feline and canine biliary tract: A postmortem study

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1111/vru.13372
Vahideh Rahmani, Juha Peltonen, Dmitri Hmelnikov, Raimonda Uosyte, Sofia Männikkö, Thomas Spillmann, Mirja Ruohoniemi
{"title":"Three‐dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiography is superior to two‐dimensional single‐shot magnetic resonance cholangiography for visualization and image quality of the feline and canine biliary tract: A postmortem study","authors":"Vahideh Rahmani, Juha Peltonen, Dmitri Hmelnikov, Raimonda Uosyte, Sofia Männikkö, Thomas Spillmann, Mirja Ruohoniemi","doi":"10.1111/vru.13372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is an established diagnostic tool for noninvasive assessment of the biliary tract in humans. It has also been found to be feasible in companion animals, but no published studies have compared MRC sequences in veterinary medicine. The present study is part of a prospective, observational, analytical investigation on MR cholangiopancreatography performed on the donated bodies of 12 cats and eight dogs. The main aim of this study was to compare the images of 2D‐SSh‐TSE‐MRC and 3D‐TSE‐MRC sequences for visualization and image quality of the feline and canine biliary tract. Both sequences are T2‐weighted and noncontrast. Three independent readers scored the visibility of four segments of the biliary tract, namely the gallbladder (GB), cystic duct, common bile duct (CBD), and extrahepatic ducts, and the image quality of the two MRC sequences using five‐point Likert scales. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used to compare the scores between the MRC sequences separately for cats and dogs. Inter‐ and intraobserver agreements were measured using Gwet's AC2 with linear weighting. The 3D‐TSE‐MRC images were scored significantly higher than the 2D‐SSh‐TSE‐MRC for both visibility and image quality (<jats:italic>P </jats:italic>&lt; .001–.016 for cats, <jats:italic>P </jats:italic>= .008–.031 for dogs); the only exception was GB in dogs. In both cats and dogs, interobserver agreement for segment visibility and image quality ranged from slight to substantial in 2D‐SSh‐TSE‐MRC and from poor to almost perfect in 3D‐TSE‐MRC. Most of the assessments (73% for segment visibility and 66% for image quality) had substantial to almost perfect intraobserver agreement. Findings from the current study support the use of 3D‐TSE‐MRC over 2D‐SSh‐TSE‐MRC for evaluation of the feline and canine biliary tract, but further studies on live animals are warranted.","PeriodicalId":23581,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13372","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is an established diagnostic tool for noninvasive assessment of the biliary tract in humans. It has also been found to be feasible in companion animals, but no published studies have compared MRC sequences in veterinary medicine. The present study is part of a prospective, observational, analytical investigation on MR cholangiopancreatography performed on the donated bodies of 12 cats and eight dogs. The main aim of this study was to compare the images of 2D‐SSh‐TSE‐MRC and 3D‐TSE‐MRC sequences for visualization and image quality of the feline and canine biliary tract. Both sequences are T2‐weighted and noncontrast. Three independent readers scored the visibility of four segments of the biliary tract, namely the gallbladder (GB), cystic duct, common bile duct (CBD), and extrahepatic ducts, and the image quality of the two MRC sequences using five‐point Likert scales. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used to compare the scores between the MRC sequences separately for cats and dogs. Inter‐ and intraobserver agreements were measured using Gwet's AC2 with linear weighting. The 3D‐TSE‐MRC images were scored significantly higher than the 2D‐SSh‐TSE‐MRC for both visibility and image quality (P < .001–.016 for cats, P = .008–.031 for dogs); the only exception was GB in dogs. In both cats and dogs, interobserver agreement for segment visibility and image quality ranged from slight to substantial in 2D‐SSh‐TSE‐MRC and from poor to almost perfect in 3D‐TSE‐MRC. Most of the assessments (73% for segment visibility and 66% for image quality) had substantial to almost perfect intraobserver agreement. Findings from the current study support the use of 3D‐TSE‐MRC over 2D‐SSh‐TSE‐MRC for evaluation of the feline and canine biliary tract, but further studies on live animals are warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在猫科动物和犬科动物胆道的可视化和图像质量方面,三维磁共振胆管造影优于二维单次磁共振胆管造影:一项尸检研究
磁共振胆管造影(MRC)是一种成熟的诊断工具,用于对人类胆道进行无创评估。它在伴侣动物中也被认为是可行的,但目前还没有公开发表的研究对兽医学中的磁共振胆管造影序列进行过比较。本研究是一项前瞻性、观察性、分析性研究的一部分,研究对象是对 12 只猫和 8 只狗捐献的尸体进行的 MR 胆管胰腺造影。本研究的主要目的是比较 2D-SSh-TSE-MRC 和 3D-TSE-MRC 序列图像对猫科动物和犬科动物胆道的可视化和图像质量。两种序列均为 T2 加权和非对比。三名独立读者使用五点李克特量表对胆囊(GB)、胆囊管、胆总管(CBD)和肝外胆管这四个胆道节段的可见度以及两种 MRC 序列的图像质量进行评分。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分别比较猫和狗的 MRC 序列得分。采用 Gwet's AC2 线性加权法测量观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性。在可见度和图像质量方面,3D-TSE-MRC 图像的得分明显高于 2D-SSh-TSE-MRC 图像(猫的 P < .001-.016, 狗的 P = .008-.031 );唯一例外的是狗的 GB。在猫和狗中,2D-SSh-TSE-MRC 的观察者之间在节段可见度和图像质量方面的一致性从轻微到显著不等,3D-TSE-MRC 的一致性从较差到几乎完美不等。大多数评估(73% 的切面可见度和 66% 的图像质量)的观察者内部一致性都很高,甚至接近完美。目前的研究结果支持使用 3D-TSE-MRC 而非 2D-SSh-TSE-MRC 评估猫科动物和犬科动物的胆道,但还需要对活体动物进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
133
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is a bimonthly, international, peer-reviewed, research journal devoted to the fields of veterinary diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology. Established in 1958, it is owned by the American College of Veterinary Radiology and is also the official journal for six affiliate veterinary organizations. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is represented on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, World Association of Medical Editors, and Committee on Publication Ethics. The mission of Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is to serve as a leading resource for high quality articles that advance scientific knowledge and standards of clinical practice in the areas of veterinary diagnostic radiology, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, nuclear imaging, radiation oncology, and interventional radiology. Manuscript types include original investigations, imaging diagnosis reports, review articles, editorials and letters to the Editor. Acceptance criteria include originality, significance, quality, reader interest, composition and adherence to author guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of sedation and general anesthesia protocols for 18F-FDG-PET/CT studies in dogs and cats: Musculoskeletal uptake and radiation dose to workers. Radiographic findings in dogs with 360 degrees gastric dilatation and volvulus. The effect of midline shift on survival time in dogs with structural brain disease diagnosed on MRI. Computed tomographic features of severe horn infection in a male Scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah). Diagnostic imaging findings in lame Warmblood horses with bone injuries of the medial proximal phalanx glenoid cavity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1