Partners’ Experiences of Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1007/s10880-024-10012-w
Claire Borthwick, Chris Penlington, Lucy Robinson
{"title":"Partners’ Experiences of Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis","authors":"Claire Borthwick, Chris Penlington, Lucy Robinson","doi":"10.1007/s10880-024-10012-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic review of qualitative studies synthesised evidence on the experience chronic pain from the perspective of romantic partners. Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO, APA PsycInfo via Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies exploring the impact of chronic pain from partners’ perspectives using qualitative data collection methods were eligible for inclusion. Thematic synthesis was conducted, and confidence in the review findings was assessed using GRADE CERQual criteria. A total of 198 participants were represented from 15 primary studies. Four interconnected analytical themes were developed: ‘life is different’, ‘internal conflict between two worlds’, ‘togetherness vs separateness’, and ‘coping in the longer term’. Out of 27 review findings, 9 were assessed as high confidence, 12 as moderate confidence, 4 as low confidence, and 2 as very low confidence. Socially isolated partners, those in strained relationships, and partners who continually sacrificed their own needs were more likely to experience distressing emotions. Greater recognition of partners’ needs is needed within pain management services.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-024-10012-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review of qualitative studies synthesised evidence on the experience chronic pain from the perspective of romantic partners. Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO, APA PsycInfo via Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies exploring the impact of chronic pain from partners’ perspectives using qualitative data collection methods were eligible for inclusion. Thematic synthesis was conducted, and confidence in the review findings was assessed using GRADE CERQual criteria. A total of 198 participants were represented from 15 primary studies. Four interconnected analytical themes were developed: ‘life is different’, ‘internal conflict between two worlds’, ‘togetherness vs separateness’, and ‘coping in the longer term’. Out of 27 review findings, 9 were assessed as high confidence, 12 as moderate confidence, 4 as low confidence, and 2 as very low confidence. Socially isolated partners, those in strained relationships, and partners who continually sacrificed their own needs were more likely to experience distressing emotions. Greater recognition of partners’ needs is needed within pain management services.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伴侣对慢性疼痛的体验:定性证据综述
这篇定性研究的系统性综述从恋爱伴侣的角度综合了有关慢性疼痛体验的证据。我们检索了 Ovid 的 Medline、Ovid 的 Embase、EBSCO 的 CINAHL、Ovid 的 APA PsycInfo、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库。采用定性数据收集方法从伴侣的角度探讨慢性疼痛影响的研究符合纳入条件。进行了专题综合,并采用 GRADE CERQual 标准评估了综述结果的可信度。共有 198 名参与者参与了 15 项主要研究。形成了四个相互关联的分析主题:"生活不同"、"两个世界之间的内部冲突"、"团聚与分离 "以及 "长期应对"。在 27 项审查结果中,9 项被评为高度信任,12 项为中度信任,4 项为低度信任,2 项为极低度信任。与社会隔绝的伴侣、关系紧张的伴侣以及不断牺牲自己需求的伴侣更容易产生痛苦情绪。疼痛管理服务需要更多地关注伴侣的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.
期刊最新文献
A Developmental Approach to Mid-Career Faculty Leadership Training at Two Academic Medical Centers. A Faculty Growth Perspective on Peer Review of Teaching: An Institution-Wide, Customizable Approach to Peer Review. Beneficial Childhood Experiences Mitigate the Negative Effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences in Adults. The Role of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Marginalized Identities in US Medical Students' Burnout, Career Regret, and Medical School Experiences. Understanding Differences in Medical Student Perceptions of Treatment Adherence Based on Weight Status in Pediatric Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1