Perception of Healthcare Professionals towards Electronic-Prescribing at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1155/2024/6553470
Faisel Dula Sema, Abel Getu Kebede, Girum Zeleke Soworsu, Tigist Tsegaye Mengistu, Hussien Endris Assen, Esileman Abdela Muche, Rahel Belete Abebe, Leila Kenzu Kemal, Abdisa Gemedi Jara, Abdulwase Mohammed Seid
{"title":"Perception of Healthcare Professionals towards Electronic-Prescribing at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Faisel Dula Sema, Abel Getu Kebede, Girum Zeleke Soworsu, Tigist Tsegaye Mengistu, Hussien Endris Assen, Esileman Abdela Muche, Rahel Belete Abebe, Leila Kenzu Kemal, Abdisa Gemedi Jara, Abdulwase Mohammed Seid","doi":"10.1155/2024/6553470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Background</i>. Electronic-prescribing (e-prescribing) is the most recent technological advancement in the medication use process. Its adoption and consequent realization of its potential benefits, however, mainly depend on the healthcare professionals’ perception, willingness to accept, and engagement with the technology. <i>Objectives</i>. This study is aimed at assessing the perception of healthcare professionals towards e-prescribing at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, from June 1 to August 30, 2021. <i>Method</i>. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a simple random sampling technique. A self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Data were entered into and analyzed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS® (IBM Corporation)) version 24. Both descriptive and inferential statistics like the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used for data analysis. A statistical significance was declared at a <svg height=\"10.2124pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-3.42943pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -6.78297 7.83752 10.2124\" width=\"7.83752pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"></path></g></svg> value &lt; 0.05. <i>Result</i>. From 401 participants, the majority of study participants had a neutral perception of e-prescribing. More than two-thirds (68.8%) of them had a neutral perception towards the perceived usefulness of e-prescribing with a median (interquartile range (IQR)) perceived usefulness of 43.0 (7.0) (maximum <span><svg height=\"8.55521pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.2063904pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -8.34882 38.391 8.55521\" width=\"38.391pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,4.875,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,10.374,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,16.848,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,21.501,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,30.76,0)\"></path></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\"8.55521pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.2063904pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"41.9731838 -8.34882 12.655 8.55521\" width=\"12.655pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,42.023,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,48.263,0)\"></path></g></svg>).</span></span> The perceived ease of use of e-prescribing was also neutral in the case of more than three-fourths (79.8%) of participants with a median (IQR) perceived ease of use of 49.0 (6) (maximum <span><svg height=\"8.32035pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.2063999pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -8.11395 38.391 8.32035\" width=\"38.391pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-116\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,4.875,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-100\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,10.374,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-112\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,16.848,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-115\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,21.501,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-102\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,30.76,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g117-34\"></use></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\"8.32035pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.2063999pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"41.9731838 -8.11395 12.655 8.32035\" width=\"12.655pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,42.023,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,48.265,0)\"></path></g></svg>).</span></span> Similarly, more than half (56.6%) of the participants had a neutral perception towards the perceived fitness of e-prescribing with a median (IQR) perceived fitness of 15.0 (2.5) (maximum <span><svg height=\"8.55521pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.2063904pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -8.34882 38.391 8.55521\" width=\"38.391pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-116\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,4.875,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-100\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,10.374,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-112\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,16.848,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-115\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,21.501,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g190-102\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,30.76,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g117-34\"></use></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\"8.55521pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.2063904pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"41.9731838 -8.34882 12.655 8.55521\" width=\"12.655pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,42.023,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,48.263,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-54\"></use></g></svg>).</span></span> The perception of the participants showed a significant difference based on their qualifications and work and computer use experience. Participants who heard about e-prescribing and e-prescribing software had a significantly higher mean rank score of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived fitness of e-prescribing. Participants who previously used e-prescribing had also a significantly higher mean rank score of perceived usefulness. <i>Conclusion and Recommendation</i>. The majority of healthcare professionals had a neutral perception of e-prescribing. The perception of healthcare professionals differs based on their qualifications, work and computer use experience, and their exposure to e-prescribing. The hospital should take all expectations and concerns of all HCPs into consideration and provide experience-sharing opportunities for all healthcare professionals who may potentially be involved in e-prescribing.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6553470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Electronic-prescribing (e-prescribing) is the most recent technological advancement in the medication use process. Its adoption and consequent realization of its potential benefits, however, mainly depend on the healthcare professionals’ perception, willingness to accept, and engagement with the technology. Objectives. This study is aimed at assessing the perception of healthcare professionals towards e-prescribing at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, from June 1 to August 30, 2021. Method. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a simple random sampling technique. A self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Data were entered into and analyzed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS® (IBM Corporation)) version 24. Both descriptive and inferential statistics like the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used for data analysis. A statistical significance was declared at a value < 0.05. Result. From 401 participants, the majority of study participants had a neutral perception of e-prescribing. More than two-thirds (68.8%) of them had a neutral perception towards the perceived usefulness of e-prescribing with a median (interquartile range (IQR)) perceived usefulness of 43.0 (7.0) (maximum ). The perceived ease of use of e-prescribing was also neutral in the case of more than three-fourths (79.8%) of participants with a median (IQR) perceived ease of use of 49.0 (6) (maximum ). Similarly, more than half (56.6%) of the participants had a neutral perception towards the perceived fitness of e-prescribing with a median (IQR) perceived fitness of 15.0 (2.5) (maximum ). The perception of the participants showed a significant difference based on their qualifications and work and computer use experience. Participants who heard about e-prescribing and e-prescribing software had a significantly higher mean rank score of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived fitness of e-prescribing. Participants who previously used e-prescribing had also a significantly higher mean rank score of perceived usefulness. Conclusion and Recommendation. The majority of healthcare professionals had a neutral perception of e-prescribing. The perception of healthcare professionals differs based on their qualifications, work and computer use experience, and their exposure to e-prescribing. The hospital should take all expectations and concerns of all HCPs into consideration and provide experience-sharing opportunities for all healthcare professionals who may potentially be involved in e-prescribing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学综合专科医院医护人员对电子处方的看法:横断面研究
背景。电子处方(e-prescribing)是用药过程中最新的技术进步。然而,电子处方的采用及其潜在效益的实现主要取决于医护人员对该技术的认知、接受意愿和参与程度。研究目的本研究旨在评估 2021 年 6 月 1 日至 8 月 30 日期间埃塞俄比亚西北部贡达尔大学综合专科医院的医护人员对电子处方的看法。研究方法。采用简单随机抽样技术进行横断面研究。数据收集采用自填式问卷。数据通过社会科学统计软件包(SPSS®(IBM 公司))第 24 版进行输入和分析。数据分析使用了描述性和推论性统计方法,如 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验。统计显著性以 0.05 为界。结果在 401 名参与者中,大多数人对电子处方持中立态度。超过三分之二的参与者(68.8%)对电子处方的实用性持中立态度,实用性的中位数(四分位数间距)为 43.0(7.0)(最大值)。超过四分之三(79.8%)的受访者对电子处方的易用性也持中立态度,其易用性中位数(IQR)为 49.0(6)(最高)。同样,半数以上(56.6%)的参与者对电子处方的适用性持中立态度,适用性的中位数(IQR)为 15.0(2.5)(最高)。根据参与者的资历、工作和计算机使用经验,他们对电子处方的认知存在显著差异。听说过电子处方和电子处方软件的参与者在电子处方的感知有用性、感知易用性和感知适合性方面的平均等级分明显更高。曾经使用过电子处方的参与者在感知有用性方面的平均得分也明显更高。结论与建议。大多数医疗保健专业人员对电子处方持中立态度。医护人员对电子处方的看法因其资历、工作和计算机使用经验以及对电子处方的接触程度而有所不同。医院应考虑到所有医护人员的期望和顾虑,并为所有可能参与电子处方的医护人员提供分享经验的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1