Academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice: A theory-guided scoping review

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Nursing Review Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1111/inr.12965
Xirongguli Halili RN, Yuting Xia RN, Zeen Li RN, Siyuan Tang  , Honghong Wang RN, FAAN, Qirong Chen RN
{"title":"Academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice: A theory-guided scoping review","authors":"Xirongguli Halili RN,&nbsp;Yuting Xia RN,&nbsp;Zeen Li RN,&nbsp;Siyuan Tang  ,&nbsp;Honghong Wang RN, FAAN,&nbsp;Qirong Chen RN","doi":"10.1111/inr.12965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Academic–practice partnerships have the potential to solve many challenges in evidence-based nursing practice which is crucial for high-quality care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To identify the existing knowledge on academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted this review following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We performed a comprehensive literature search of nine databases as well as five websites for gray literature. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening and data extraction and analysis. A third researcher was involved when needed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Dedicated time, dedicated resources, and compatible goals were found to be the top three inputs in academic–practice partnerships for evidence-based nursing practice. Meeting and discussion were the most popular forms of activities. Sufficient resources were the most important facilitators. Insufficient resources, insufficient time, and communication issues were the top three barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The assumption proposed in the practice–academic partnership logic model (i.e., inputs plus activities can lead to outputs and outcomes) was preliminarily verified by the results of this review in the context of evidence-based nursing practice. Academic–practice partnerships can leverage the advantages of both sides to overcome barriers and promote evidence-based nursing practice. However, it is essential to conduct a broader range of high-quality studies. Such endeavors could offer more comprehensive evidence for refining the framework of academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for nursing education, practice, policy and research</h3>\n \n <p>The “theoretical framework of academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice” could theoretically guide academic and clinical nursing staff to collaborate on evidence-based nursing practice and related research and education programs. The academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice could lead to a win-win situation for both the academic and the clinical sides. Furthermore, the results of this study provide an evidence-based foundation for policymakers to develop supportive policies for academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":"71 4","pages":"729-746"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inr.12965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Academic–practice partnerships have the potential to solve many challenges in evidence-based nursing practice which is crucial for high-quality care.

Aims

To identify the existing knowledge on academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice.

Methods

We conducted this review following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We performed a comprehensive literature search of nine databases as well as five websites for gray literature. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening and data extraction and analysis. A third researcher was involved when needed.

Results

Dedicated time, dedicated resources, and compatible goals were found to be the top three inputs in academic–practice partnerships for evidence-based nursing practice. Meeting and discussion were the most popular forms of activities. Sufficient resources were the most important facilitators. Insufficient resources, insufficient time, and communication issues were the top three barriers.

Conclusions

The assumption proposed in the practice–academic partnership logic model (i.e., inputs plus activities can lead to outputs and outcomes) was preliminarily verified by the results of this review in the context of evidence-based nursing practice. Academic–practice partnerships can leverage the advantages of both sides to overcome barriers and promote evidence-based nursing practice. However, it is essential to conduct a broader range of high-quality studies. Such endeavors could offer more comprehensive evidence for refining the framework of academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice.

Implications for nursing education, practice, policy and research

The “theoretical framework of academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice” could theoretically guide academic and clinical nursing staff to collaborate on evidence-based nursing practice and related research and education programs. The academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice could lead to a win-win situation for both the academic and the clinical sides. Furthermore, the results of this study provide an evidence-based foundation for policymakers to develop supportive policies for academic–practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循证护理实践中的学术-实践伙伴关系:理论指导下的范围界定审查
学术与实践的伙伴关系有可能解决循证护理实践中的许多挑战,这对高质量护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
期刊最新文献
The Role and Mandate of Nurses in Disasters: A Delphi Study in German-Speaking Countries. Machine Learning in Assessing Intraoperative Blood Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Self-Care Strategies of Emergency Nurses in Armed Conflict Areas: Experiences From the Field. Expanded Roles and Competency Gaps of Emergency and ICU Nurses During Armed Conflict in Gaza. Steering the Future of Nursing in Jordan: Translating the International Council of Nurses 2025 Definitions Into Practice, Education, and Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1