{"title":"(Pseudo-)Synthetic BRST quantisation of the bosonic string and the higher quantum origin of dualities","authors":"Andrei T. Patrascu","doi":"arxiv-2404.06522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I am arguing in favour of the hypothesis that the origin of\ngauge and string dualities in general can be found in a higher-categorical\ninterpretation of basic quantum mechanics. It is interesting to observe that\nthe Galilei group has a non-trivial cohomology, while the Lorentz/Poincare\ngroup has trivial cohomology. When we constructed quantum mechanics, we noticed\nthe non-trivial cohomology structure of the Galilei group and hence, we\nrequired for a proper quantisation procedure that would be compatible with the\nsymmetry group of our theory, to go to a central extension of the Galilei group\nuniversal covering by co-cycle. This would be the Bargmann group. However,\nNature didn't choose this path. Instead in nature, the Galilei group is not\nrealised, while the Lorentz group is. The fact that the Galilei group has\ntopological obstructions leads to a central charge, the mass, and a\nsuperselection rule, required to implement the Galilei symmetry, that forbids\ntransitions between states of different mass. The topological structure of the\nLorentz group however lacks such an obstruction, and hence allows for\ntransitions between states of different mass. The connectivity structure of the\nLorentz group as opposed to that of the Galilei group can be interpreted in the\nsense of an ER=EPR duality for the topological space associated to group\ncohomology. In string theory we started with the Witt algebra, and due to\nsimilar quantisation issues, we employed the central extension by co-cycle to\nobtain the Virasoro algebra. This is a unique extension for orientation\npreserving diffeomorphisms on a circle, but there is no reason to believe that,\nat the high energy domain in physics where this would apply, we do not have a\ntotally different structure altogether and the degrees of freedom present there\nwould require something vastly more general and global.","PeriodicalId":501190,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.06522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article I am arguing in favour of the hypothesis that the origin of
gauge and string dualities in general can be found in a higher-categorical
interpretation of basic quantum mechanics. It is interesting to observe that
the Galilei group has a non-trivial cohomology, while the Lorentz/Poincare
group has trivial cohomology. When we constructed quantum mechanics, we noticed
the non-trivial cohomology structure of the Galilei group and hence, we
required for a proper quantisation procedure that would be compatible with the
symmetry group of our theory, to go to a central extension of the Galilei group
universal covering by co-cycle. This would be the Bargmann group. However,
Nature didn't choose this path. Instead in nature, the Galilei group is not
realised, while the Lorentz group is. The fact that the Galilei group has
topological obstructions leads to a central charge, the mass, and a
superselection rule, required to implement the Galilei symmetry, that forbids
transitions between states of different mass. The topological structure of the
Lorentz group however lacks such an obstruction, and hence allows for
transitions between states of different mass. The connectivity structure of the
Lorentz group as opposed to that of the Galilei group can be interpreted in the
sense of an ER=EPR duality for the topological space associated to group
cohomology. In string theory we started with the Witt algebra, and due to
similar quantisation issues, we employed the central extension by co-cycle to
obtain the Virasoro algebra. This is a unique extension for orientation
preserving diffeomorphisms on a circle, but there is no reason to believe that,
at the high energy domain in physics where this would apply, we do not have a
totally different structure altogether and the degrees of freedom present there
would require something vastly more general and global.