{"title":"Causality in the maximally extended Reissner--Nordström spacetime with identifications","authors":"Andrzej Krasiński","doi":"arxiv-2409.03786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The maximally extended Reissner--Nordstr\\\"{o}m (RN) spacetime with $e^2 <\nm^2$ can be interpreted either as an infinite chain of asymptotically flat\nregions connected by tunnels between timelike singularities or as a set of just\none asymptotically flat region and one tunnel; the repetitions of this set in\nthe infinite chain being identified. The second interpretation gives rise to\nthe suspicion of acausality, i.e. the possibility of sending messages to one's\nown past. A numerical investigation of this problem was carried out in this\npaper and gave the following result. Let E be the initial point of a radial\ntimelike future-directed ingoing geodesic G, lying halfway between the outer\nhorizon and the image of the null infinity in the maximally extended RN\nspacetime. Let E$'$ be the first future copy of E. It was verified whether the\nturning point of G will lie to the future or to the past from the past light\ncone (PLC) of E$'$. In the second case the breach of causality does occur. It\nturned out that the acausality is present when $V_E$, the timelike coordinate\nof E, is negative with a sufficiently large $|V_E|$, and is absent with a\nsufficiently large $V_E > 0$. In between these values there exists a\n$\\widetilde{V}_E$, dependent on the initial data for the geodesic, for which\nthe turning point lies on the PLC. So, the identification does lead to\nacausality. Nonradial timelike and null geodesics were also investigated, and a\nfew hitherto unknown properties of the maximal extension were revealed. For\nexample, the singularity arc at $r = 0$ may be convex or concave, depending on\nthe values of $m$ and $e$.","PeriodicalId":501190,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The maximally extended Reissner--Nordstr\"{o}m (RN) spacetime with $e^2 <
m^2$ can be interpreted either as an infinite chain of asymptotically flat
regions connected by tunnels between timelike singularities or as a set of just
one asymptotically flat region and one tunnel; the repetitions of this set in
the infinite chain being identified. The second interpretation gives rise to
the suspicion of acausality, i.e. the possibility of sending messages to one's
own past. A numerical investigation of this problem was carried out in this
paper and gave the following result. Let E be the initial point of a radial
timelike future-directed ingoing geodesic G, lying halfway between the outer
horizon and the image of the null infinity in the maximally extended RN
spacetime. Let E$'$ be the first future copy of E. It was verified whether the
turning point of G will lie to the future or to the past from the past light
cone (PLC) of E$'$. In the second case the breach of causality does occur. It
turned out that the acausality is present when $V_E$, the timelike coordinate
of E, is negative with a sufficiently large $|V_E|$, and is absent with a
sufficiently large $V_E > 0$. In between these values there exists a
$\widetilde{V}_E$, dependent on the initial data for the geodesic, for which
the turning point lies on the PLC. So, the identification does lead to
acausality. Nonradial timelike and null geodesics were also investigated, and a
few hitherto unknown properties of the maximal extension were revealed. For
example, the singularity arc at $r = 0$ may be convex or concave, depending on
the values of $m$ and $e$.