COVID‐19 lockdowns affected birthing outcomes in a regional New South Wales Health District

Pierre Hofstee, Bridie Mulholland, Megan Kelly, Warren Davis, Kate Curtis
{"title":"COVID‐19 lockdowns affected birthing outcomes in a regional New South Wales Health District","authors":"Pierre Hofstee, Bridie Mulholland, Megan Kelly, Warren Davis, Kate Curtis","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe 400 000 residents of the Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District (ISLHD) experienced two distinct lockdowns aimed at mitigating the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Analysing effects of these lockdowns on maternal and neonatal outcomes presents a valuable opportunity to assess the impact of pandemic‐level restrictions on maternal and neonatal outcomes.AimEvaluate the impacts of restrictions from two lockdown periods on maternal, birthing, and neonatal outcomes within a regional local health district.Materials and MethodsThe study included 22 166 women who gave birth within ISLHD between 2017 and 2022. Groups included for analysis: Control Group – mothers pregnant before the pandemic (conception before 3 April 2019); Exposure Group 1 – mothers pregnant during the first lockdown (conception date 22 January 2020 to 5 May 2020); and Exposure Group 2 – mothers pregnant during the second lockdown (conception date 30 April 2021 to 13 Sep 2021).ResultsOdds of adverse birthing outcomes including non‐reassuring fetal status (odds ratio (OR) 1.34; 95% CI 1.14–1.56 and OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03–1.40), and postpartum haemorrhage (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.73–2.41 and OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.48–2.05) were substantially increased in Exposure Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, low birth weight and admission to neonatal intensive care rates improved.ConclusionsPregnant women exposed to pandemic restrictions within ISLHD had decreased odds of adverse antenatal and neonatal outcomes, but increased odds of poor peripartum outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe 400 000 residents of the Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District (ISLHD) experienced two distinct lockdowns aimed at mitigating the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Analysing effects of these lockdowns on maternal and neonatal outcomes presents a valuable opportunity to assess the impact of pandemic‐level restrictions on maternal and neonatal outcomes.AimEvaluate the impacts of restrictions from two lockdown periods on maternal, birthing, and neonatal outcomes within a regional local health district.Materials and MethodsThe study included 22 166 women who gave birth within ISLHD between 2017 and 2022. Groups included for analysis: Control Group – mothers pregnant before the pandemic (conception before 3 April 2019); Exposure Group 1 – mothers pregnant during the first lockdown (conception date 22 January 2020 to 5 May 2020); and Exposure Group 2 – mothers pregnant during the second lockdown (conception date 30 April 2021 to 13 Sep 2021).ResultsOdds of adverse birthing outcomes including non‐reassuring fetal status (odds ratio (OR) 1.34; 95% CI 1.14–1.56 and OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03–1.40), and postpartum haemorrhage (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.73–2.41 and OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.48–2.05) were substantially increased in Exposure Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, low birth weight and admission to neonatal intensive care rates improved.ConclusionsPregnant women exposed to pandemic restrictions within ISLHD had decreased odds of adverse antenatal and neonatal outcomes, but increased odds of poor peripartum outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 封锁影响了新南威尔士一个地区卫生区的分娩结果
引言伊拉瓦拉肖尔港地方卫生区(Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District,ISLHD)的 40 万居民经历了两次不同的封锁,旨在减少严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 感染的传播。分析这两次封锁对孕产妇和新生儿预后的影响为评估大流行病级别的限制措施对孕产妇和新生儿预后的影响提供了宝贵的机会.AimEvaluate the impacts of restrictions from two lockdown periods on maternal, birthing, and neonatal outcomes within a regional local health district.材料与方法该研究纳入了2017年至2022年期间在ISLHD内分娩的22 166名妇女。分析对象包括对照组--大流行前怀孕的母亲(2019 年 4 月 3 日前受孕);暴露组 1--第一次封锁期间怀孕的母亲(受孕日期为 2020 年 1 月 22 日至 2020 年 5 月 5 日);暴露组 2--第二次封锁期间怀孕的母亲(受孕日期为 2021 年 4 月 30 日至 2021 年 9 月 13 日)。结果暴露组 1 和暴露组 2 的不良分娩结果,包括胎儿无保障(几率比(OR)1.34;95% CI 1.14-1.56 和 OR 1.20;95% CI 1.03-1.40)和产后出血(OR 2.04;95% CI 1.73-2.41 和 OR 1.74;95% CI 1.48-2.05)的几率分别大幅增加。妊娠糖尿病、妊娠高血压、低出生体重和新生儿重症监护入院率均有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative motility assessment of sperm retrieved from micro‐testicular sperm extraction: A single‐centre study comparing fresh and frozen–thawed sperm Pregnancy in women with mitochondrial disease—A literature review and suggested guidance for preconception and pregnancy care Correction to the abstracts of Annual Scientific Meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), 28 October – 1 November 2023 Investigation of the quality and health literacy demand of online information on pelvic floor exercises to reduce stress urinary incontinence Why does hormonal contraception and menopausal hormonal treatment have such a small effect on breast cancer risk?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1