Botho/Ubuntu paradigm as cognitive justice in psychology

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL School Psychology International Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1177/01430343241244748
Maximus Monaheng Sefotho, Moeketsi Letseka
{"title":"Botho/Ubuntu paradigm as cognitive justice in psychology","authors":"Maximus Monaheng Sefotho, Moeketsi Letseka","doi":"10.1177/01430343241244748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of Botho/ Ubuntu emerges as a balancing paradigm poised to drive cognitive justice in psychological discourses. A paradigm is a universally recognized scientific model that represents a worldview of the nature of the world. There are enduring concerns about the privileging of Western European paradigms, ontologies, epistemologies, and axiologies over their African counterparts. In this article, we present the Botho/ Ubuntu paradigm as a strong contender for the promotion, and humanization of epistemologies in psychology. The 59th annual conference of the Comparative and International Education Society (CIES) in Washington, DC in 2015, whose theme was “ Ubuntu! Imagining a Humanist Education Globally,” as well as the World Council of Comparative Education Societies’ (WCCES) recent book, Comparative Education for Global Citizenship, Peace and Shared Living through Ubuntu, are examples through which Ubuntu began to emerge as a paradigm poised to deliver cognitive and epistemic justice in the area such as psychology. We use Critical African Psychology as a lens through which we interrogate cognitive injustice. We conclude by demonstrating that Botho/Ubuntu paradigm might serve as a driver of cognitive justice in psychology and makes inroads into major discourses driven by African scholars.","PeriodicalId":47723,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology International","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343241244748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of Botho/ Ubuntu emerges as a balancing paradigm poised to drive cognitive justice in psychological discourses. A paradigm is a universally recognized scientific model that represents a worldview of the nature of the world. There are enduring concerns about the privileging of Western European paradigms, ontologies, epistemologies, and axiologies over their African counterparts. In this article, we present the Botho/ Ubuntu paradigm as a strong contender for the promotion, and humanization of epistemologies in psychology. The 59th annual conference of the Comparative and International Education Society (CIES) in Washington, DC in 2015, whose theme was “ Ubuntu! Imagining a Humanist Education Globally,” as well as the World Council of Comparative Education Societies’ (WCCES) recent book, Comparative Education for Global Citizenship, Peace and Shared Living through Ubuntu, are examples through which Ubuntu began to emerge as a paradigm poised to deliver cognitive and epistemic justice in the area such as psychology. We use Critical African Psychology as a lens through which we interrogate cognitive injustice. We conclude by demonstrating that Botho/Ubuntu paradigm might serve as a driver of cognitive justice in psychology and makes inroads into major discourses driven by African scholars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博托/乌班图范式作为心理学中的认知正义
博托(Botho)/乌班图(Ubuntu)的概念作为一种平衡范式出现,有望推动心理学论述中的认知正义。范式是一种普遍认可的科学模式,代表着一种关于世界本质的世界观。西欧范式、本体论、认识论和公理优于非洲范式、本体论、认识论和公理的现象一直备受关注。在本文中,我们将提出博托/乌班图范式,作为促进心理学认识论人性化的有力竞争者。2015 年在华盛顿特区举行的第 59 届比较与国际教育学会(CIES)年会的主题是 "乌班图"!想象全球范围内的人文主义教育",以及世界比较教育学会理事会(WCCES)最近出版的《通过乌班图促进全球公民意识、和平与共同生活的比较教育》一书,都是乌班图作为一种范式开始在心理学等领域实现认知和认识正义的实例。我们以非洲批判心理学为视角,审视认知不公正问题。最后,我们将证明博托/乌班图范式可能会成为心理学认知公正的推动力,并在非洲学者的主要论述中占据一席之地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology International
School Psychology International PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The official publication of the ISPA. School Psychology International highlights the concerns of those who provide quality mental health, educational, therapeutic and support services to schools and their communities throughout the world. The Journal publishes a wide range of original empirical research, cross-cultural replications of promising procedures and descriptions of technology transfer
期刊最新文献
“It takes a village”: An ecological analysis of social and emotional learning environments in Malawi Measuring teacher-student relationships among children with emotional and behavioral problems Provision of educational psychological services under a high inflationary environment in Masvingo Province, Zimbabwe The role of teachers’ social and emotional competence in implementing social and emotional learning (SEL) curriculum in Malawi Ostracism, school engagement, and academic achievement: Examining a mediation model among senior high school students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1