A method for developing and calibrating optimization techniques for oil production management strategy applications

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computational Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1007/s10596-024-10282-1
Leandro H. Danes, Guilherme D. Avansi, Denis J. Schiozer
{"title":"A method for developing and calibrating optimization techniques for oil production management strategy applications","authors":"Leandro H. Danes, Guilherme D. Avansi, Denis J. Schiozer","doi":"10.1007/s10596-024-10282-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The hydrocarbon extraction process is complex and involves numerous design variables and mitigating risk. Numerous time-consuming simulations are required to maximize objective functions such as NPV from a particular field while contemplating a significant representation of uncertainty scenarios and various production strategies. Production strategies searches may result in a high-dimensional search space which can yield sub-optimal reservoir economical exploration. As a solution, appropriate optimization algorithms selection and tuning may provide good solutions with lesser simulations. This paper presents a methodology to calibrate, develop, and select optimization algorithms for oil production strategy applications while quantifying the dimension and optimum location effects. Global optimum location altered the best method to be selected. It presents a novel algorithm (ASLHC) and a modification of the Nelder-Mead method (NMNS) to improve its high dimensionality performance. Performances of six pre-calibrated techniques were compared using novel normalized mathematical functions. Optimizations were limited to a 500 evaluation functions computational budget. The PSO, ASLHC, NMNS, and IDLHC were selected and implemented to perform production strategy improvements regarding two parameterizations of the reservoir management variables for a real reservoir model with restricted platform. Results showed the implemented algorithms successfully improved NPV by at least 8% at each of the 24 real-case optimizations. After upscaling the selected techniques for a 115 variable parameterization, the NMNS and IDLHC demonstrated good resilience against local convergence and each technique kept improving during all iterations of the process. An optimization method recommendation chart is presented based on the computational budget of the application.</p>","PeriodicalId":10662,"journal":{"name":"Computational Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-024-10282-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hydrocarbon extraction process is complex and involves numerous design variables and mitigating risk. Numerous time-consuming simulations are required to maximize objective functions such as NPV from a particular field while contemplating a significant representation of uncertainty scenarios and various production strategies. Production strategies searches may result in a high-dimensional search space which can yield sub-optimal reservoir economical exploration. As a solution, appropriate optimization algorithms selection and tuning may provide good solutions with lesser simulations. This paper presents a methodology to calibrate, develop, and select optimization algorithms for oil production strategy applications while quantifying the dimension and optimum location effects. Global optimum location altered the best method to be selected. It presents a novel algorithm (ASLHC) and a modification of the Nelder-Mead method (NMNS) to improve its high dimensionality performance. Performances of six pre-calibrated techniques were compared using novel normalized mathematical functions. Optimizations were limited to a 500 evaluation functions computational budget. The PSO, ASLHC, NMNS, and IDLHC were selected and implemented to perform production strategy improvements regarding two parameterizations of the reservoir management variables for a real reservoir model with restricted platform. Results showed the implemented algorithms successfully improved NPV by at least 8% at each of the 24 real-case optimizations. After upscaling the selected techniques for a 115 variable parameterization, the NMNS and IDLHC demonstrated good resilience against local convergence and each technique kept improving during all iterations of the process. An optimization method recommendation chart is presented based on the computational budget of the application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和校准石油生产管理策略应用优化技术的方法
碳氢化合物开采过程十分复杂,涉及众多设计变量和降低风险。需要进行大量耗时的模拟,以最大限度地实现目标函数,如特定油田的净现值,同时考虑大量的不确定情况和各种生产策略。生产策略搜索可能会导致高维搜索空间,从而产生次优的储层经济勘探。作为一种解决方案,选择和调整适当的优化算法可以在较少模拟的情况下提供良好的解决方案。本文介绍了一种校准、开发和选择石油生产策略应用优化算法的方法,同时量化了维度和最优位置的影响。全局最优位置改变了最佳选择方法。它提出了一种新算法(ASLHC)和对 Nelder-Mead 方法(NMNS)的修改,以提高其高维性能。使用新型归一化数学函数对六种预校准技术的性能进行了比较。优化仅限于 500 个评估函数的计算预算。选择并实施了 PSO、ASLHC、NMNS 和 IDLHC,针对一个平台受限的真实油藏模型,对油藏管理变量的两个参数化进行了生产策略改进。结果表明,所实施的算法在 24 次实际优化中,每次都成功地将净现值提高了至少 8%。在对 115 个变量参数化所选技术进行升级后,NMNS 和 IDLHC 显示出良好的抗局部收敛能力,并且每种技术在所有迭代过程中都在不断改进。根据应用的计算预算,提出了优化方法推荐图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Geosciences
Computational Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computational Geosciences publishes high quality papers on mathematical modeling, simulation, numerical analysis, and other computational aspects of the geosciences. In particular the journal is focused on advanced numerical methods for the simulation of subsurface flow and transport, and associated aspects such as discretization, gridding, upscaling, optimization, data assimilation, uncertainty assessment, and high performance parallel and grid computing. Papers treating similar topics but with applications to other fields in the geosciences, such as geomechanics, geophysics, oceanography, or meteorology, will also be considered. The journal provides a platform for interaction and multidisciplinary collaboration among diverse scientific groups, from both academia and industry, which share an interest in developing mathematical models and efficient algorithms for solving them, such as mathematicians, engineers, chemists, physicists, and geoscientists.
期刊最新文献
Modeling alterations in relative permeability curves due to salinity using artificial neural networks Consistent prediction of well paths and geological surfaces A numerical model for offshore Geological Carbon Storage (GCS) undergoing hydrate formation Less-Intrusive Consistent Discretization Methods for Reservoir Simulation on Cut-cell Grids – Algorithms, Implementation, and Testing Unsupervised segmentation for sandstone thin section image analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1