Clinical Application and Fading of Synchronous Reinforcement for Increasing Self-Feeding for a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder and History of Trauma
Nicole C. Demchuk, Megan H. Bigham, Bethany A. Hansen
{"title":"Clinical Application and Fading of Synchronous Reinforcement for Increasing Self-Feeding for a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder and History of Trauma","authors":"Nicole C. Demchuk, Megan H. Bigham, Bethany A. Hansen","doi":"10.1177/15346501241244755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current case study, we evaluated synchronous reinforcement (SSR) as an intervention to increase self-feeding for a 5-year-old male diagnosed with ASD and a pediatric feeding disorder who also had a history of trauma. Synchronous reinforcement is a schedule of covariation where reinforcement is delivered continuously contingent on responding. Synchronous reinforcement has not been previously reported in the literature in a feeding context. A benefit of reinforcement-based procedures, such as SSR, is that they may align with recommendations for trauma-informed care by preventing or limiting the necessity of physical guidance procedures for those with a history of physical trauma. This is of particular significance given children with disabilities are more likely to experience traumatic events and abuse. We demonstrated that SSR was an effective intervention for increasing self-feeding, as well as methods for fading SSR as a treatment component. We discuss the potential for SSR as a trauma-informed approach, and the importance of caregiver collaboration and programming for generalization.","PeriodicalId":46059,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Case Studies","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15346501241244755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the current case study, we evaluated synchronous reinforcement (SSR) as an intervention to increase self-feeding for a 5-year-old male diagnosed with ASD and a pediatric feeding disorder who also had a history of trauma. Synchronous reinforcement is a schedule of covariation where reinforcement is delivered continuously contingent on responding. Synchronous reinforcement has not been previously reported in the literature in a feeding context. A benefit of reinforcement-based procedures, such as SSR, is that they may align with recommendations for trauma-informed care by preventing or limiting the necessity of physical guidance procedures for those with a history of physical trauma. This is of particular significance given children with disabilities are more likely to experience traumatic events and abuse. We demonstrated that SSR was an effective intervention for increasing self-feeding, as well as methods for fading SSR as a treatment component. We discuss the potential for SSR as a trauma-informed approach, and the importance of caregiver collaboration and programming for generalization.
在当前的案例研究中,我们评估了同步强化(SSR)作为一种干预措施对一名被诊断出患有自闭症和小儿喂养障碍的 5 岁男性(他也有外伤史)的自我喂养能力的提高效果。同步强化是一种共变计划,即根据反应持续给予强化。以前的文献中还没有关于喂养方面的同步强化的报道。以强化为基础的程序(如 SSR)的一个好处是,它们可以防止或限制对有身体创伤史的儿童进行身体引导的必要性,从而符合创伤知情护理的建议。鉴于残疾儿童更有可能经历创伤事件和虐待,这一点尤为重要。我们证明了 SSR 是提高自我喂养的有效干预措施,同时也证明了逐渐将 SSR 作为治疗组成部分的方法。我们讨论了 SSR 作为一种创伤知情方法的潜力,以及照顾者合作和编程对于推广的重要性。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Case Studies seeks manuscripts that articulate various theoretical frameworks. All manuscripts will require an abstract and must adhere to the following format: (1) Theoretical and Research Basis, (2) Case Introduction, (3) Presenting Complaints, (4) History, (5) Assessment, (6) Case Conceptualization (this is where the clinician"s thinking and treatment selection come to the forefront), (7) Course of Treatment and Assessment of Progress, (8) Complicating Factors (including medical management), (9) Managed Care Considerations (if any), (10) Follow-up (how and how long), (11) Treatment Implications of the Case, (12) Recommendations to Clinicians and Students, and References.