A qualitative study of military service members undergoing medical separation

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1002/jclp.23668
Su Yeon Lee-Tauler, Jessica M. LaCroix, Tierney K. Huppert, Amber M. Winters, Max Stivers, A. Penelope Arellano-Euribe, Joseph Grammer, Erin Cobb, Kathryn J. Alvarado, David Boyd, Lee E. Patterson, Mario F. Golle, Marjan Ghahramanlou-Holloway
{"title":"A qualitative study of military service members undergoing medical separation","authors":"Su Yeon Lee-Tauler,&nbsp;Jessica M. LaCroix,&nbsp;Tierney K. Huppert,&nbsp;Amber M. Winters,&nbsp;Max Stivers,&nbsp;A. Penelope Arellano-Euribe,&nbsp;Joseph Grammer,&nbsp;Erin Cobb,&nbsp;Kathryn J. Alvarado,&nbsp;David Boyd,&nbsp;Lee E. Patterson,&nbsp;Mario F. Golle,&nbsp;Marjan Ghahramanlou-Holloway","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Little research explores military perspectives on medical disability-related transition. A qualitative study sought to understand transition experiences of United States military Service members found <i>unfit for duty</i> following medical and physical evaluation boards (MEBs and PEBs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Confidential telephone interviews were conducted with 25 current and prior Service members. Participants were asked to share their experiences before, during, and after the MEB and PEB processes. Interview questions explored (1) health conditions that prompted the medical disability evaluation, (2) reactions to being recommended for separation, (3) transition-related stress and challenges, and (4) coping strategies. Salient themes were identified across chronological narratives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants expressed that debilitating physical (e.g., injury) and/or mental (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder) illnesses prompted their medical evaluation. In response to the unfit for duty notice, some participants reported emotional distress (e.g., anxiety, anger) connected to uncertainty about the future. Other participants reported relief connected to a sense of progression toward their medical disability claim status. Transition stress included the length of the MEB/PEB process, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the process, financial stress, impact on family life, and compounded effect of these stressors on emotional distress, including depression and suicidal thoughts. Participants reported using adaptive (e.g., psychotherapy) and maladaptive (e.g., excessive drinking) strategies to cope with stress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Preliminary reports of emotional distress and transition stress following unfit for duty notices highlight the need for increased support and interventions to facilitate adaptive coping strategies during this vulnerable period.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"80 6","pages":"1345-1364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Little research explores military perspectives on medical disability-related transition. A qualitative study sought to understand transition experiences of United States military Service members found unfit for duty following medical and physical evaluation boards (MEBs and PEBs).

Methods

Confidential telephone interviews were conducted with 25 current and prior Service members. Participants were asked to share their experiences before, during, and after the MEB and PEB processes. Interview questions explored (1) health conditions that prompted the medical disability evaluation, (2) reactions to being recommended for separation, (3) transition-related stress and challenges, and (4) coping strategies. Salient themes were identified across chronological narratives.

Results

Participants expressed that debilitating physical (e.g., injury) and/or mental (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder) illnesses prompted their medical evaluation. In response to the unfit for duty notice, some participants reported emotional distress (e.g., anxiety, anger) connected to uncertainty about the future. Other participants reported relief connected to a sense of progression toward their medical disability claim status. Transition stress included the length of the MEB/PEB process, impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the process, financial stress, impact on family life, and compounded effect of these stressors on emotional distress, including depression and suicidal thoughts. Participants reported using adaptive (e.g., psychotherapy) and maladaptive (e.g., excessive drinking) strategies to cope with stress.

Conclusion

Preliminary reports of emotional distress and transition stress following unfit for duty notices highlight the need for increased support and interventions to facilitate adaptive coping strategies during this vulnerable period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受医疗离职的军人进行定性研究
目标很少有研究探讨军人对医疗残疾相关过渡的看法。一项定性研究试图了解美国现役军人在医疗和身体评估委员会(MEBs 和 PEBs)后被认定为不适合服役的过渡经历。方法对 25 名现役和退役军人进行了保密电话采访。受访者被要求分享他们在医疗和身体评估委员会(MEB)和体检委员会(PEB)程序之前、期间和之后的经历。访谈问题探讨了:(1)导致医疗伤残评估的健康状况;(2)对被建议离职的反应;(3)与过渡相关的压力和挑战;以及(4)应对策略。结果受访者表示,身体衰弱(如受伤)和/或精神疾病(如创伤后应激障碍)促使他们接受医疗评估。对于不适合上岗的通知,一些参与者表示情绪上的痛苦(如焦虑、愤怒)与对未来的不确定性有关。另一些参评者则表示,他们感到自己的伤残医疗申请状态有了进展,从而减轻了压力。过渡压力包括:MEB/PEB 程序的长度、COVID-19 大流行病对程序的影响、经济压力、对家庭生活的影响,以及这些压力对情绪困扰的复合影响,包括抑郁和自杀的想法。结论关于不适合工作通知后的情绪困扰和过渡压力的初步报告突出表明,在这一脆弱时期,需要增加支持和干预,以促进适应性应对策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Advocating for Life: A Hospital's Guide to Suicide Prevention. Common Elements and Differences Among Treatment Approaches to Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Commentary on Five Case Studies. The Relationships Between Body-Related Emotion Intolerance and Restrictive Eating as a Function of Multidimensional Perfectionism. Enhancing Insight in Patients With Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Case Study on Avatar Therapy Using Virtual Reality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1