A mechanistic alternative to minimal sufficiency as the guiding principle for NCC research

IF 3.1 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Neuroscience of Consciousness Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1093/nc/niae014
Andy Mckilliam
{"title":"A mechanistic alternative to minimal sufficiency as the guiding principle for NCC research","authors":"Andy Mckilliam","doi":"10.1093/nc/niae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A central project for the neuroscience of consciousness is to reveal the neural basis of consciousness. For the past 20-odd years, this project has been conceptualized in terms of minimal sufficiency. Recently, a number of authors have suggested that the project is better conceived in mechanistic terms as the search for difference-makers. In this paper, I (i) motivate this mechanistic alternative to minimal sufficiency, (ii) develop it further by clarifying debates about the prospects of leveraging mutual manipulability to distinguish constitutive difference-makers from those that are merely causal, and (iii) explore the implications this has for recent debates concerning the status of the prefrontal cortex. I argue that adopting a mechanistic approach to the neuroscience of consciousness suggests that the prefrontal cortex is part of the neural mechanisms underlying consciousness even if it is not strictly speaking a necessary part.","PeriodicalId":52242,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience of Consciousness","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience of Consciousness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niae014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A central project for the neuroscience of consciousness is to reveal the neural basis of consciousness. For the past 20-odd years, this project has been conceptualized in terms of minimal sufficiency. Recently, a number of authors have suggested that the project is better conceived in mechanistic terms as the search for difference-makers. In this paper, I (i) motivate this mechanistic alternative to minimal sufficiency, (ii) develop it further by clarifying debates about the prospects of leveraging mutual manipulability to distinguish constitutive difference-makers from those that are merely causal, and (iii) explore the implications this has for recent debates concerning the status of the prefrontal cortex. I argue that adopting a mechanistic approach to the neuroscience of consciousness suggests that the prefrontal cortex is part of the neural mechanisms underlying consciousness even if it is not strictly speaking a necessary part.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从机制上替代最低限度的充分性作为净捐助国研究的指导原则
意识神经科学的一个核心项目是揭示意识的神经基础。在过去的二十多年里,这一项目一直被概念化为最低限度的充分性。最近,一些学者提出,用机械论的术语将这一项目构想为寻找 "差异制造者 "更为合适。在本文中,我将(i)从机械论的角度出发,提出最小充足性的替代方案;(ii)通过澄清有关利用相互可操作性来区分构成性差异制造者与仅仅是因果关系的差异制造者的前景的争论,进一步发展这一方案;(iii)探讨这一方案对近期有关前额叶皮层地位的争论的影响。我认为,采用机械论的方法来研究意识的神经科学表明,前额叶皮层是意识的神经机制的一部分,即使严格来说它不是一个必要的部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience of Consciousness
Neuroscience of Consciousness Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Phenomenology of auto-induced cognitive trance using text mining: a prospective and exploratory group study. More than words: can free reports adequately measure the richness of perception? Making sense of feelings. Within-subject comparison of near-death and psychedelic experiences: acute and enduring effects. Visual imagery vividness correlates with afterimage conscious perception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1