Studies of Social Anxiety Using Ambulatory Assessment: Systematic Review

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.2196/46593
Javier Fernández-Álvarez, Desirée Colombo, Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Maitena Pierantonelli, Rosa María Baños, Cristina Botella
{"title":"Studies of Social Anxiety Using Ambulatory Assessment: Systematic Review","authors":"Javier Fernández-Álvarez, Desirée Colombo, Juan Martín Gómez Penedo, Maitena Pierantonelli, Rosa María Baños, Cristina Botella","doi":"10.2196/46593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> There has been an increased interest in understanding social anxiety (SA) and SA disorder (SAD) antecedents and consequences as they occur in real time, resulting in a proliferation of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA). Despite the exponential growth of research in this area, these studies have not been synthesized yet. <strong>Objective:</strong> This review aimed to identify and describe the latest advances in the understanding of SA and SAD through the use of AA. <strong>Methods:</strong> Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. <strong>Results:</strong> A total of 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. The qualitative synthesis of these studies showed that AA permitted the exploration of the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral dynamics associated with the experience of SA and SAD. In line with the available models of SA and SAD, emotion regulation, perseverative cognition, cognitive factors, substance use, and interactional patterns were the principal topics of the included studies. In addition, the incorporation of AA to study psychological interventions, multimodal assessment using sensors and biosensors, and transcultural differences were some of the identified emerging topics. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> AA constitutes a very powerful methodology to grasp SA from a complementary perspective to laboratory experiments and usual self-report measures, shedding light on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral antecedents and consequences of SA and the development and maintenance of SAD as a mental disorder.","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/46593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been an increased interest in understanding social anxiety (SA) and SA disorder (SAD) antecedents and consequences as they occur in real time, resulting in a proliferation of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA). Despite the exponential growth of research in this area, these studies have not been synthesized yet. Objective: This review aimed to identify and describe the latest advances in the understanding of SA and SAD through the use of AA. Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. Results: A total of 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. The qualitative synthesis of these studies showed that AA permitted the exploration of the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral dynamics associated with the experience of SA and SAD. In line with the available models of SA and SAD, emotion regulation, perseverative cognition, cognitive factors, substance use, and interactional patterns were the principal topics of the included studies. In addition, the incorporation of AA to study psychological interventions, multimodal assessment using sensors and biosensors, and transcultural differences were some of the identified emerging topics. Conclusions: AA constitutes a very powerful methodology to grasp SA from a complementary perspective to laboratory experiments and usual self-report measures, shedding light on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral antecedents and consequences of SA and the development and maintenance of SAD as a mental disorder.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用非卧床评估对社交焦虑进行研究:系统回顾
背景:人们越来越希望了解社交焦虑(SA)和社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的前因和后果,因为它们是实时发生的,这导致使用流动评估(AA)的研究激增。尽管该领域的研究呈指数级增长,但这些研究尚未得到综合。目的:本综述旨在确定和描述通过使用动态评估了解 SA 和 SAD 的最新进展。方法:按照 PRISMA(Preferferred Reporting Analysis,首选报告模式)的要求,对相关研究进行分析:按照 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目)指南,在 Scopus、PubMed 和 Web of Science 上进行了系统的文献检索。结果共有 70 篇文章符合纳入标准。对这些研究的定性综述显示,AA 可以探索与 SA 和 SAD 体验相关的情感、认知和行为动态。根据现有的 SA 和 SAD 模型,情绪调节、持久认知、认知因素、药物使用和互动模式是纳入研究的主要议题。此外,将 AA 纳入心理干预研究、使用传感器和生物传感器进行多模式评估以及跨文化差异也是一些新发现的主题。结论:AA 是一种非常强大的方法,可以从实验室实验和通常的自我报告测量的补充角度来了解自闭症,揭示自闭症在认知、情感和行为方面的前因后果,以及自闭症作为一种精神障碍的发展和维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
期刊最新文献
It Is the Journey, Not the Destination: Moving From End Points to Trajectories When Assessing Chatbot Mental Health Safety. AI Chatbots for Mental Health Self-Management: Lived Experience-Centered Qualitative Study. Help-Seeking in the Age of AI: Cross-Sectional Survey of the Use and Perceptions of AI-Based Mental Health Support Among US Adults. Mass Media Narratives of Psychiatric Adverse Events Associated With Generative AI Chatbots: Rapid Scoping Review. Quantifying Consumer Interest in Medicare Advantage: Development and Usability Study Using Google Trends Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1