{"title":"Becoming response-able with a protest placard: white under(-)standing in encounters with the Black German Other","authors":"Lara-Stephanie Krause-Alzaidi","doi":"10.1515/applirev-2024-0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper emerged from an encounter with the Black Lives Matter placard <jats:italic>I understand that I will never understand but I stand with you</jats:italic> in Leipzig, Germany, and it centers white understanding as a constitutive practice of whiteness. This is mainly a theoretical contribution (learning towards the philosophical), although it includes some interview data and observations from protest participation. I contribute to raciolinguistics by reading the concept of the white listening subject through Barad’s new materialist notion of apparatuses, asking what exactly constitutes white understanding. This allows me to bring out the potentials and pitfalls (i.e. the counter/productivity) of white understanding as a reflective practice, which I put into conversation with my embodied practice of under-standing (i.e. standing under) the placard at a BLM protest in Berlin. I show how the white body is measured by a Black norm in the protest space, producing a productive discomfort filled with opportunities for becoming response-able towards the Black Other, but also towards whiteness. Considering the ethico-esthetic framing of this collection, I pursue an <jats:italic>aesthethics of wor(l)ding</jats:italic> that inter-rupts, dis/entangles, and walks around with and in words. It gestures towards what we usually leave out when pursuing one analytical avenue over another.","PeriodicalId":46472,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics Review","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper emerged from an encounter with the Black Lives Matter placard I understand that I will never understand but I stand with you in Leipzig, Germany, and it centers white understanding as a constitutive practice of whiteness. This is mainly a theoretical contribution (learning towards the philosophical), although it includes some interview data and observations from protest participation. I contribute to raciolinguistics by reading the concept of the white listening subject through Barad’s new materialist notion of apparatuses, asking what exactly constitutes white understanding. This allows me to bring out the potentials and pitfalls (i.e. the counter/productivity) of white understanding as a reflective practice, which I put into conversation with my embodied practice of under-standing (i.e. standing under) the placard at a BLM protest in Berlin. I show how the white body is measured by a Black norm in the protest space, producing a productive discomfort filled with opportunities for becoming response-able towards the Black Other, but also towards whiteness. Considering the ethico-esthetic framing of this collection, I pursue an aesthethics of wor(l)ding that inter-rupts, dis/entangles, and walks around with and in words. It gestures towards what we usually leave out when pursuing one analytical avenue over another.
本文是在德国莱比锡与 "我理解,我永远不会理解,但我与你们站在一起"(Black Lives Matter placard I understand that I will never understand but I stand with you)标语牌的相遇中产生的,它将白人理解作为白人性的一种构成性实践。这主要是一种理论贡献(向哲学学习),尽管其中包括一些访谈数据和参与抗议活动的观察结果。我通过巴拉德的新唯物主义工具概念来解读白人倾听主体的概念,询问究竟什么构成了白人理解,从而为种族语言学做出贡献。这使我能够提出白人理解作为一种反思实践的潜力和陷阱(即反作用/生产力),我将其与我在柏林 BLM 抗议活动中理解标语牌(即站在标语牌下)的具体实践相结合。我展示了白人身体如何在抗议空间中被黑人标准所衡量,从而产生一种富有成效的不适感,这种不适感充满了对黑人他者以及白人做出回应的机会。考虑到本作品集的伦理-美学框架,我追求的是一种工作(l)设计美学,这种工作(l)设计与文字相互干扰、相互分离、相互游走。它的姿态是,当我们追求一种分析途径时,通常会忽略另一种分析途径。