{"title":"In Theodorus' Spiral no two hypothenusa lie on the same line","authors":"Frederik Stouten","doi":"arxiv-2403.20207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consider the rectangular triangle with sides with length 1 and 1, then the\noblique side has length square root of 2. Now construct on top of the oblique\nside, a new rectangular triangle with the oblique side as rectangle side and a\nsecond rectangle side of length 1. Continue this process indefinitely, what you\nget is called \"the spiral of Theodorus\". Now the question is: Can there be two\nhypothenusa (oblique sides) which lie on the same line? Apparently there can't.\nA proof of this proposition was given in 1958, but to our knowledge no other\nproofs are available. Since we had no access to the journal, we wanted to prove\nit again.","PeriodicalId":501462,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.20207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Consider the rectangular triangle with sides with length 1 and 1, then the
oblique side has length square root of 2. Now construct on top of the oblique
side, a new rectangular triangle with the oblique side as rectangle side and a
second rectangle side of length 1. Continue this process indefinitely, what you
get is called "the spiral of Theodorus". Now the question is: Can there be two
hypothenusa (oblique sides) which lie on the same line? Apparently there can't.
A proof of this proposition was given in 1958, but to our knowledge no other
proofs are available. Since we had no access to the journal, we wanted to prove
it again.