Retrieving autobiographical memories in autobiographical contexts: are age-related differences in narrated episodic specificity present outside of the laboratory?

Daniel A. Hernandez, Christopher X. Griffith, Austin M. Deffner, Hanna Nkulu, Mariam Hovhannisyan, John M. Ruiz, Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna, Matthew D. Grilli
{"title":"Retrieving autobiographical memories in autobiographical contexts: are age-related differences in narrated episodic specificity present outside of the laboratory?","authors":"Daniel A. Hernandez, Christopher X. Griffith, Austin M. Deffner, Hanna Nkulu, Mariam Hovhannisyan, John M. Ruiz, Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna, Matthew D. Grilli","doi":"10.1007/s00426-024-01938-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Autobiographical Interview, a method for evaluating detailed memory of real-world events, reliably detects differences in episodic specificity at retrieval between young and older adults in the laboratory. Whether this age-associated reduction in episodic specificity for autobiographical event retrieval is present outside of the laboratory remains poorly understood. We used a videoconference format to administer the Autobiographical Interview to cognitively unimpaired older adults (<i>N</i> = 49, <i>M</i> = 69.5, SD = 5.94) and young adults (<i>N</i> = 54, <i>M</i> = 22.5, SD = 4.19) who were in their homes at the time of retrieval. Relative to young adults, older adults showed reduced episodic specificity in their home environment, as reflected by fewer episodic or “internal” details (<i>t</i> (101) = 3.23, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and more “external” details (i.e., semantic, language-based details) (<i>t</i> (101) = 3.60, <i>p</i> = 0.003). These findings, along with detail subtype profiles in the narratives, bolster the ecological validity of the Autobiographical Interview and add promise to the use of virtual cognitive testing to improve the accessibility, participant diversity, scalability, and ecological validity of memory research.</p>","PeriodicalId":501681,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01938-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Autobiographical Interview, a method for evaluating detailed memory of real-world events, reliably detects differences in episodic specificity at retrieval between young and older adults in the laboratory. Whether this age-associated reduction in episodic specificity for autobiographical event retrieval is present outside of the laboratory remains poorly understood. We used a videoconference format to administer the Autobiographical Interview to cognitively unimpaired older adults (N = 49, M = 69.5, SD = 5.94) and young adults (N = 54, M = 22.5, SD = 4.19) who were in their homes at the time of retrieval. Relative to young adults, older adults showed reduced episodic specificity in their home environment, as reflected by fewer episodic or “internal” details (t (101) = 3.23, p = 0.009) and more “external” details (i.e., semantic, language-based details) (t (101) = 3.60, p = 0.003). These findings, along with detail subtype profiles in the narratives, bolster the ecological validity of the Autobiographical Interview and add promise to the use of virtual cognitive testing to improve the accessibility, participant diversity, scalability, and ecological validity of memory research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在自传体语境中检索自传体记忆:叙述情节特异性中与年龄有关的差异是否存在于实验室之外?
自传体访谈是一种评估真实世界事件详细记忆的方法,它能在实验室中可靠地检测出年轻人和老年人在检索时外显特异性的差异。至于这种与年龄相关的自传体事件检索外显特异性的降低是否存在于实验室之外,目前还不甚了解。我们采用视频会议的形式对认知能力未受损的老年人(49 人,平均年龄 69.5 岁,平均年龄 5.94 岁)和年轻人(54 人,平均年龄 22.5 岁,平均年龄 4.19 岁)进行了自传体访谈。与年轻人相比,老年人在家庭环境中的情节特异性有所降低,表现为情节或 "内部 "细节较少(t (101) = 3.23,p = 0.009),而 "外部 "细节(即语义、语言细节)较多(t (101) = 3.60,p = 0.003)。这些发现以及叙事中的细节亚型剖析增强了自传体访谈的生态有效性,并为使用虚拟认知测试来提高记忆研究的可及性、参与者多样性、可扩展性和生态有效性增添了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Action inhibition in a sport-specific paradigm: examining the limits of action control in basketball Recurrent involuntary memories and mind wandering are related but distinct. Music in the eye of the beholder: a pupillometric study on preferred background music, attentional state, and arousal. Impact of relative and absolute values on orienting attention in time The lack of Aha! experience can be dependent on the problem difficulty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1