Why don't women engage in muscle strength exercise? An integrative review

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1002/hpja.857
A. M. Stimson, C. Anderson, A.-M. Holt, A. J. Henderson
{"title":"Why don't women engage in muscle strength exercise? An integrative review","authors":"A. M. Stimson,&nbsp;C. Anderson,&nbsp;A.-M. Holt,&nbsp;A. J. Henderson","doi":"10.1002/hpja.857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>Women are ‘at-risk’ population for failing to meet muscle strengthening guidelines. Health benefits specific to this exercise mode include maintenance of muscle mass, which is associated with reduced risk of chronic disease and falls. Of significance is the progressive decline in muscle strength exercise participation in women aged 35–54 in Australia. This period is critical for maintaining muscle strength as it establishes foundations for older women's engagement. This integrative review examined available evidence regarding factors influencing muscle strength exercise participation, specifically in women aged 35–54.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Seven databases were searched. Study inclusion criteria were: (1) peer reviewed, (2) English language, (3) sample populations of healthy female adults or general adult sample population differentiating females from males, (4) mean age between 35 and 54 years, (5) focused on muscle strength exercise and measured as the primary outcome factors of participation in muscle strength exercise.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Five of 1895 studies met inclusion criteria. Five key factors were associated with participation in muscle strength exercise of women aged 35–54 years: perceived time constraints; knowledge and education; modality and intensity; social support and behavioural strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Focused education on strength exercise and guidelines, plus initiatives and strategies that suit the needs of this cohort, are necessary to achieve health and wellbeing benefits. Responsive approaches by health professionals to these women's circumstances can potentially address current low participation levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>Creating conditions where health professionals respect a woman's exercise preferences can positively impact these women's musculoskeletal health into older age.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.857","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue Addressed

Women are ‘at-risk’ population for failing to meet muscle strengthening guidelines. Health benefits specific to this exercise mode include maintenance of muscle mass, which is associated with reduced risk of chronic disease and falls. Of significance is the progressive decline in muscle strength exercise participation in women aged 35–54 in Australia. This period is critical for maintaining muscle strength as it establishes foundations for older women's engagement. This integrative review examined available evidence regarding factors influencing muscle strength exercise participation, specifically in women aged 35–54.

Methods

Seven databases were searched. Study inclusion criteria were: (1) peer reviewed, (2) English language, (3) sample populations of healthy female adults or general adult sample population differentiating females from males, (4) mean age between 35 and 54 years, (5) focused on muscle strength exercise and measured as the primary outcome factors of participation in muscle strength exercise.

Findings

Five of 1895 studies met inclusion criteria. Five key factors were associated with participation in muscle strength exercise of women aged 35–54 years: perceived time constraints; knowledge and education; modality and intensity; social support and behavioural strategies.

Conclusions

Focused education on strength exercise and guidelines, plus initiatives and strategies that suit the needs of this cohort, are necessary to achieve health and wellbeing benefits. Responsive approaches by health professionals to these women's circumstances can potentially address current low participation levels.

So What?

Creating conditions where health professionals respect a woman's exercise preferences can positively impact these women's musculoskeletal health into older age.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么女性不进行肌肉力量锻炼?综合评述
解决的问题妇女是无法达到肌肉强化指南要求的 "高危 "人群。这种锻炼方式特有的健康益处包括保持肌肉质量,这与降低慢性病和跌倒风险有关。重要的是,澳大利亚 35-54 岁的女性参与肌肉力量锻炼的人数在逐渐减少。这一时期对于保持肌肉力量至关重要,因为它为老年妇女的参与奠定了基础。本综合综述研究了影响肌肉力量锻炼参与度的因素,特别是 35-54 岁女性肌肉力量锻炼参与度的现有证据。研究纳入标准为(1) 同行评议;(2) 英语;(3) 样本人群为健康的成年女性或区分女性与男性的普通成年样本人群;(4) 平均年龄在 35-54 岁之间;(5) 侧重于肌肉力量锻炼,并将其作为参与肌肉力量锻炼的主要结果因素进行测量。与 35-54 岁女性参与肌肉力量锻炼相关的五个关键因素是:感知到的时间限制;知识和教育;方式和强度;社会支持和行为策略。医护人员针对这些妇女的情况采取相应的方法,有可能解决目前参与率较低的问题。因此,创造条件让医护人员尊重妇女的运动偏好,可以对这些妇女进入老年后的肌肉骨骼健康产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
期刊最新文献
Public health policy for temporary seasonal workers with chronic hepatitis B in high-income countries: A comparative analysis. Issue Information Intermediate and secondary school food environment in New Zealand: Food and drink menu assessment. Retrospective analysis of regional and metropolitan school food environments using Google Street View: A case study in New South Wales, Australia with youth consultation. Evaluation of the 'A walk can work wonders' mass media campaign in South Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1