Are prophylactic antibiotics required for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of gynecologic cancers?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of Radiation Research Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1093/jrr/rrae018
Takuya Kumazawa, Yu Ohkubo, Keishiro Mochida, Saori Kondo, Osamu Oguchi, Daisaku Yoshida
{"title":"Are prophylactic antibiotics required for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of gynecologic cancers?","authors":"Takuya Kumazawa, Yu Ohkubo, Keishiro Mochida, Saori Kondo, Osamu Oguchi, Daisaku Yoshida","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rrae018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for prophylactic antibiotic treatment prior to combined intracavitary and interstitial (hybrid) brachytherapy for gynecologic cancer. A total of 105 gynecologic cancer patients received 405 brachytherapy sessions, including 302 sessions of intracavitary brachytherapy and 103 sessions of hybrid brachytherapy. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered before 35% of the hybrid brachytherapy sessions. The incidence of postbrachytherapy fever and the frequency of subsequent antibiotic use for infection were compared between treatment groups. Among patients treated with hybrid brachytherapy, fever ≥37.5°C occurred in 16.4% of those not receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 16.7% of those receiving prophylactic antibiotics (P > 0.05). Similarly, fever ≥38.0°C occurred in 4.9% of patients not receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 2.4% of those receiving prophylactic antibiotics (P > 0.05). Additional antibiotics were used to treat postbrachytherapy infections in 4.8% of the group receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 0% of those not receiving prophylactic antibiotics, again without statistically significant difference. There were also no significant differences in posttreatment fever incidence and antibiotics use for infection between intracavitary brachytherapy and hybrid brachytherapy sessions. In conclusion, the incidences of infection and fever are low following hybrid brachytherapy, so prophylactic antibiotics are generally unnecessary.","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrae018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for prophylactic antibiotic treatment prior to combined intracavitary and interstitial (hybrid) brachytherapy for gynecologic cancer. A total of 105 gynecologic cancer patients received 405 brachytherapy sessions, including 302 sessions of intracavitary brachytherapy and 103 sessions of hybrid brachytherapy. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered before 35% of the hybrid brachytherapy sessions. The incidence of postbrachytherapy fever and the frequency of subsequent antibiotic use for infection were compared between treatment groups. Among patients treated with hybrid brachytherapy, fever ≥37.5°C occurred in 16.4% of those not receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 16.7% of those receiving prophylactic antibiotics (P > 0.05). Similarly, fever ≥38.0°C occurred in 4.9% of patients not receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 2.4% of those receiving prophylactic antibiotics (P > 0.05). Additional antibiotics were used to treat postbrachytherapy infections in 4.8% of the group receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 0% of those not receiving prophylactic antibiotics, again without statistically significant difference. There were also no significant differences in posttreatment fever incidence and antibiotics use for infection between intracavitary brachytherapy and hybrid brachytherapy sessions. In conclusion, the incidences of infection and fever are low following hybrid brachytherapy, so prophylactic antibiotics are generally unnecessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇科癌症联合腔内和间质近距离放射治疗是否需要预防性抗生素?
本研究旨在评估妇科癌症联合腔内和间质(混合)近距离放射治疗前预防性抗生素治疗的必要性。共有105名妇科癌症患者接受了405次近距离治疗,包括302次腔内近距离治疗和103次混合近距离治疗。35%的混合近距离治疗疗程前使用了预防性抗生素。比较了不同治疗组近距离治疗后发热的发生率和随后使用抗生素治疗感染的频率。在接受混合近距离放射治疗的患者中,16.4%的患者未接受预防性抗生素治疗,而16.7%的患者接受了预防性抗生素治疗(P&p;gt; 0.05)。同样,发热≥38.0°C的患者中,未接受预防性抗生素治疗的占 4.9%,接受预防性抗生素治疗的占 2.4%(P&;gt; 0.05)。接受预防性抗生素治疗的患者中有4.8%在近距离放射治疗后发生感染,而未接受预防性抗生素治疗的患者中则有0%在近距离放射治疗后发生感染,两者之间同样没有显著的统计学差异。腔内近距离治疗和混合近距离治疗的治疗后发热发生率和抗生素感染使用率也无明显差异。总之,混合近距离治疗后感染和发烧的发生率很低,因此一般不需要预防性抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of acrylic phantom for use in quality assurance of BNCT beam output procedure. Cost-effectiveness analysis for multi adverse events of proton beam therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma in Japan. Feasibility of creating a daily adaptive plan using automatic DIR-created target and OARs contours in patients with prostate cancer magnetic-resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern magnetic resonance imaging era may be omitted: a propensity score-matched analysis. Elevated α/β ratio after hypofractionated radiotherapy correlated with DNA damage repairment in an experimental model of prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1