Journal of Radiation Research最新文献

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of pre-treatment blood cell counts in patients with brain metastasis (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated using linear accelerator (linac)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) with a micro-multileaf collimator. Between January 2011 and November 2022, 271 consecutive patients underwent linac-based SRS/fSRT for BM from NSCLC. Thirty patients with insufficient blood test data during this period were excluded from this analysis. Thirty-five patients with steroid intake at the time point of the blood test and 18 patients with higher C-reactive protein were excluded. Thus, 188 patients were eventually enrolled in this study. The median follow-up period after SRS/fSRT was 21 months (range: 0-121 months), and the median survival time after SRS/fSRT was 19 months. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 1.90, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio ≤ 1.67 and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) ≥ 2.95 were unfavorable predictors of prognosis for patients who underwent SRS/fSRT for BM from NSCLC. Cox proportional-hazard multivariate analysis revealed that the SIRI was independent prognostic factors for increased risk of death. Thus, simple, less expensive, and routinely performed pre-treatment blood cell count measurements such as SIRI can predict the overall survival of patients treated with SRS/fSRT for BM from NSCLC.

This study aimed to investigate the safety of combining radium-223 chloride (Ra-223) therapy with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for patients with multiple bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), including lesions requiring urgent treatment such as those causing neurological symptoms due to spinal cord compression. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with CRPC and bone metastases treated with Ra-223 therapy at our hospital between September 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. Adverse events were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Of the 23 patients referred, data from 17 were included; 8 received concurrent Ra-223 therapy and EBRT, whereas others received only Ra-223 therapy. The median follow-up period was 20 months. Grade (G) 2 or higher adverse events occurred in seven patients (41.2%), and G 3 or higher in 2 (11.7%). None of the patients who received EBRT with fields involving the gastrointestinal tract experienced diarrhea, constipation, bleeding, perforation, or obstruction. Ra-223 therapy with EBRT did not increase adverse events compared with studies of Ra-223 therapy without EBRT. One case of G 5 Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, likely because of steroid use for neurological symptoms and the patient's underlying diabetes mellitus, was noted. The effects of EBRT cannot be entirely excluded, so minimizing field size and dose is recommended when combining Ra-223 therapy and EBRT. Our findings indicate that concurrent Ra-223 therapy and EBRT could be safe for managing patients with symptomatic bone metastases and castration-resistant prostate cancer who require specialized treatment, provided sufficient attention is given to the field and the prescribed dose.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a severe arrhythmia commonly treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation (CA). Although CA is effective in reducing recurrent VT, its impact on survival remains uncertain, especially in patients with extensive scarring. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has emerged as a novel treatment for VT in patients unresponsive to CA, leveraging techniques from stereotactic body radiation therapy used in cancer treatments. Recent clinical trials and case series have demonstrated the short-term efficacy and safety of STAR, although long-term outcomes remain unclear. Imaging techniques, such as electroanatomical mapping, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear imaging, play a crucial role in treatment planning by identifying VT substrates and guiding target delineation. However, challenges persist owing to the complex anatomy and variability in target volume definitions. Advances in imaging and artificial intelligence are expected to improve the precision and efficacy of STAR. The exact mechanisms underlying the antiarrhythmic effects of STAR, including potential fibrosis and improvement in cardiac conduction, are still being explored. Despite its potential, STAR should be cautiously applied in prospective clinical trials, with a focus on optimizing dose delivery and understanding long-term outcomes. Collaborative efforts are necessary to standardize treatment strategies and enhance the quality of life for patients with refractory VT.

Dynamic WaveArc (DWA) is a technique used for continuous, non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy on the Vero4DRT platform. This study aimed to evaluate the application of single-isocenter DWA (SI-DWA) for treating multiple brain metastases by comparing dose distribution and irradiation time with multi-isocenter DWA (MI-DWA) through retrospective treatment planning. Treatment plans were developed for SI-DWA and MI-DWA in 14 cases with 3-5 brain metastases. Parameters assessed included target dose indices, such as conformity index (CI) of the planning target volume (PTV), volumes of normal brain excluding gross tumor volumes (GTVs) receiving a single dose equivalent of 14 Gy (V14), V30%, V20%, V10%, volumes of normal brain, including GTVs receiving a single dose equivalent of 12 Gy (V12), D2% for other organs at risk, and beam-on time. SI-DWA showed inferior CI, V14, and V12 values for lesions with PTV volumes <1 cc, whereas it performed equivalently to MI-DWA for lesions with PTV volumes ≥1 cc. SI-DWA resulted in higher volumes of normal brain receiving low doses compared to MI-DWA. SI-DWA exhibited significantly shorter beam-on times than MI-DWA. In conclusion, SI-DWA is an effective method for treating multiple brain metastases with PTV volumes ≥1 cc, offering an index of radiation-induced brain necrosis comparable with MI-DWA while allowing for shorter irradiation times.

We assessed the effect of beam size on plan robustness for intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) of head and neck cancer (HNC) and compared the plan quality including robustness with that of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). IMPT plans were generated for six HNC patients using six beam sizes (air-sigma 3-17 mm at isocenter for a 70-230 MeV) and two optimization methods for planning target volume-based non-robust optimization (NRO) and clinical target volume (CTV)-based robust optimization (RO). Worst-case dosimetric parameters and plan robustness for CTV and organs-at-risk (OARs) were assessed under different scenarios, assuming a ± 1-5 mm setup error and a ± 3% range error. Statistical comparisons of NRO-IMPT, RO-IMPT and IMRT plans were performed. In regard to CTV-D99%, RO-IMPT with smaller beam size was more robust than RO-IMPT with larger beam sizes, whereas NRO-IMPT showed the opposite (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the robustness of the CTV-D99% and CTV-D95% between RO-IMPT and IMRT. The worst-case CTV coverage of IMRT (±5 mm/3%) for all patients was 96.0% ± 1.4% (D99%) and 97.9% ± 0.3% (D95%). For four out of six patients, the worst-case CTV-D95% for RO-IMPT (±1-5 mm/3%) were higher than those for IMRT. Compared with IMRT, RO-IMPT with smaller beam sizes achieved lower worst-case doses to OARs. In HNC treatment, utilizing smaller beam sizes in RO-IMPT improves plan robustness compared to larger beam sizes, achieving comparable target robustness and lower worst-case OARs doses compared to IMRT.

This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT). A total of 606 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between January 2008 and December 2018 were included. Of these patients, 510 received PBT up to a dose of 70-78 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) and 96 patients received IMRT up to a dose of 70-78 Gy. The median follow-up period was 82 months (range: 32-140 months). Patients in the PBT group had significantly higher 7-year rates of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates: 95.1% for PBT vs 89.9% for IMRT (P = 0.0271) and 93.1% for PBT vs 85.0% for IMRT (P = 0.0019). After matching analysis, 94 patients were assigned to both groups, and the PBT group showed significantly higher 7-year bRFS and DFS rates: 98.9% for PBT vs 89.7% for IMRT (P = 0.023) and 93.4% for PBT vs 84.6% for IMRT (P = 0.022), respectively. In the subgroup analysis of intermediate-risk patients, the PBT group showed a significantly higher 7-year bRFS rate (98.3% for PBT vs 90.5% for IMRT; P = 0.007). The V60 of the bladder in the PBT group (18.1% ± 10.1%) was higher than that in the IMRT group (14.4% ± 7.6%) (P = 0.024). This study found that the treatment outcomes of PBT potentially surpassed those of IMRT specifically concerning bRFS and DFS in real-world settings. However, it should be noted that attention is warranted for late bladder complication of PBT.

The accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) system has been approved for specific cases covered by health insurance, and clinical trials for new cases in Japan are currently being conducted on other systems. Owing to the progress of accelerator-based BNCT, the operation of medical physics must be rendered more efficient. A water phantom is used for the quality assurance (QA) of the BNCT beam output procedure; however, a solid phantom is preferred for routine QA because of its ease of use. Additionally, because water phantoms cannot be readily used in some facilities owing to structural problems, solid phantoms are preferred for unified measurements at different facilities to compare beam outputs. In this study, we perform irradiation tests using an acrylic phantom and verify that an acrylic phantom can be used for QA. The distribution of thermal neutron flux and gamma-ray dose rate inside the acrylic phantom are evaluated through experiments and simulations. The results indicate that the acrylic phantom is suitable for routine QA and for comparing beam outputs among different systems. In the future, the same irradiation tests will be conducted at other facilities.

Between 1949 and 1962 the Soviet Union performed atmospheric tests of nuclear weapons at the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site (SNTS) in Kazakhstan, resulting in widespread contamination of the surrounding region with radioactive fallout. Settlements in the southeast Abai oblast of Kazakhstan, close to the border with China, are not thought to have received significant fallout from the SNTS. There is, however, evidence that the study area, including Makanchi, Urdzhar and Taskesken villages, was contaminated by atmospheric nuclear tests performed by China at the Lop Nor NTS between 1964 and 1980. We identified the most reliable data indicating contamination from the Lop Nor tests from archive documents. Prompt sampling of soil performed in the area revealed elevated levels of total beta activity in the days and weeks following the Lop Nor tests. The highest activities were recorded following the thermonuclear tests in June 1967 and June 1973. Tooth enamel dosimetry using electron paramagnetic resonance methods suggests residents of the study area have been exposed to excess doses of 50-60 mGy but provides no information on the source and timing of exposure. Currently, evidence of contamination of the study area from nuclear weapons testing at Lop Nor is based on limited radiation measurement data. Therefore, work will continue on the search for archival data on radiological and meteorological monitoring carried out in the study area at the time of the Lop Nor testing campaign.