Flow-Diverting Devices in the Treatment of Vertebral Artery Aneurysms: Insights into Efficacy and Safety from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Translational Stroke Research Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1007/s12975-024-01251-y
Changya Liu, Xinxin Wu, Kaikai Guo, Yuting Sun, Cai Yike, Xuebin Hu, Bangjiang Fang
{"title":"Flow-Diverting Devices in the Treatment of Vertebral Artery Aneurysms: Insights into Efficacy and Safety from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Changya Liu, Xinxin Wu, Kaikai Guo, Yuting Sun, Cai Yike, Xuebin Hu, Bangjiang Fang","doi":"10.1007/s12975-024-01251-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of flow-diverting devices (FDs) treatment for intracranial vertebral artery (VA) aneurysms. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, OVID, and Embase for English-language studies up to February 2024 and included clinical studies on FD treatment of intracranial VA aneurysms. Sensitivity analysis evaluated outcome stability. Of 2273 articles, 29 studies involving 541 aneurysms treated with FDs were included. Based on the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS), six were high-quality and 23 moderate quality. FD treatment showed a 95% rate of favorable clinical outcomes (95% CI, 89–99%), 81% (95% CI, 74–88%) complete aneurysmal occlusion, 4% (95% CI, 2–7%) ischemic complication incidence, 1% (95% CI, 0–3%) hemorrhagic complication incidence, 95% (95% CI, 87–100%) posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) preservation, and 6% (95% CI, 3–10%) in-stent stenosis or occlusion across clinical and angiographic follow-up periods of 13.62 months (95% CI, 10.72–16.52) and 11.85 months (95% CI, 9.36–14.33), respectively. Subgroup analyses, based on a 12-month angiographic follow-up threshold, indicated no statistically significant differences in rates of complete aneurysm occlusion, PICA preservation, or in-stent stenosis or occlusion incidence (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) between subgroups. Moreover, significant differences were observed in clinical and angiographic outcomes between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, particularly in hemorrhagic complications (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), without significant disparity in ischemic complications (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The results’ stability was confirmed via sensitivity analysis. FDs treatment for VA aneurysms is efficacious and safe, offering high rates of positive clinical and angiographic outcomes with minimal complications, underscoring FDs’ viability as a treatment option for VA aneurysms. The study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024499894).</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-024-01251-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of flow-diverting devices (FDs) treatment for intracranial vertebral artery (VA) aneurysms. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, OVID, and Embase for English-language studies up to February 2024 and included clinical studies on FD treatment of intracranial VA aneurysms. Sensitivity analysis evaluated outcome stability. Of 2273 articles, 29 studies involving 541 aneurysms treated with FDs were included. Based on the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS), six were high-quality and 23 moderate quality. FD treatment showed a 95% rate of favorable clinical outcomes (95% CI, 89–99%), 81% (95% CI, 74–88%) complete aneurysmal occlusion, 4% (95% CI, 2–7%) ischemic complication incidence, 1% (95% CI, 0–3%) hemorrhagic complication incidence, 95% (95% CI, 87–100%) posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) preservation, and 6% (95% CI, 3–10%) in-stent stenosis or occlusion across clinical and angiographic follow-up periods of 13.62 months (95% CI, 10.72–16.52) and 11.85 months (95% CI, 9.36–14.33), respectively. Subgroup analyses, based on a 12-month angiographic follow-up threshold, indicated no statistically significant differences in rates of complete aneurysm occlusion, PICA preservation, or in-stent stenosis or occlusion incidence (p > 0.05) between subgroups. Moreover, significant differences were observed in clinical and angiographic outcomes between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, particularly in hemorrhagic complications (p < 0.05), without significant disparity in ischemic complications (p > 0.05). The results’ stability was confirmed via sensitivity analysis. FDs treatment for VA aneurysms is efficacious and safe, offering high rates of positive clinical and angiographic outcomes with minimal complications, underscoring FDs’ viability as a treatment option for VA aneurysms. The study was registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024499894).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗椎动脉动脉瘤的分流装置:系统回顾和元分析对疗效和安全性的启示
本研究旨在开展一项系统性综述和荟萃分析,评估血流转向装置(FDs)治疗颅内椎动脉(VA)动脉瘤的有效性和安全性。我们检索了PubMed、Web of Science、OVID和Embase上截至2024年2月的英文研究,并纳入了FD治疗颅内椎动脉瘤的临床研究。敏感性分析评估了结果的稳定性。在 2273 篇文章中,共纳入了 29 项研究,涉及 541 个使用 FD 治疗的动脉瘤。根据非随机研究方法指数(MINORS),其中6项为高质量研究,23项为中等质量研究。FD 治疗的良好临床结果率为 95%(95% CI,89-99%),动脉瘤完全闭塞率为 81%(95% CI,74-88%),缺血性并发症发生率为 4%(95% CI,2-7%),出血发生率为 1%(95% CI,0-3%)、在 13 个月的临床和血管造影随访期间,出血并发症发生率为 95%(95% CI,87%-100%),小脑后下动脉(PICA)保留率为 95%(95% CI,87%-100%),支架内狭窄或闭塞率为 6%(95% CI,3%-10%)。62个月(95% CI,10.72-16.52)和11.85个月(95% CI,9.36-14.33)。基于 12 个月血管造影随访阈值的亚组分析表明,不同亚组之间在动脉瘤完全闭塞率、PICA 保留率、支架内狭窄或闭塞发生率方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。此外,还观察到破裂与未破裂动脉瘤的临床和血管造影结果存在明显差异,尤其是在出血性并发症方面(p <0.05),而缺血性并发症方面则无明显差异(p >0.05)。敏感性分析证实了这一结果的稳定性。FDs治疗VA动脉瘤既有效又安全,临床和血管造影结果阳性率高,并发症极少,强调了FDs作为VA动脉瘤治疗方案的可行性。该研究已在 PROSPERO 注册(注册号:CRD42024499894)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
期刊最新文献
Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling Reveals Low Methylation Variability in Moyamoya Disease. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Exacerbates Thromboembolic Cerebrovascular Complications in Humanized ACE2 Mouse Model. The Effect of the ABCB1(MDR-1) C3435T Polymorphism in Turkish Patients with Aspirin Resistance in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Effect of INR on Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion. Clopidogrel Is Associated with Reduced Likelihood of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a Multi-Center Matched Retrospective Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1