Making apps, owning data: Digital sovereignty and public authorities’ arrangements to “byte” back

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Organization Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1177/13505084241246073
Alexander Paulsson, Mats Fred
{"title":"Making apps, owning data: Digital sovereignty and public authorities’ arrangements to “byte” back","authors":"Alexander Paulsson, Mats Fred","doi":"10.1177/13505084241246073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study tells the story of two public transport authorities (PTA) in Sweden who developed their own apps. Although this might seem trivial and far-detached from the critical issues discussed in organization studies, this story raises questions of great relevance for this field, namely how digital sovereignty is organized. Digital sovereignty refers to governments trying to take or regain power and control over “the digital,” which a small group of large tech companies have monopolized. Drawing on a 3 year qualitative study of app making, and using assemblage theory, this study shows that digital sovereignty is not only about controlling software development or data ownership, but also about re-configuring the organization in relation to digital artifacts such as apps. By bypassing procurement procedures and paralleling their IT-departments, the PTAs here display how digital sovereignty comes from “below,” originating from frustrated civil servants within the public authorities who literally tried to “byte back” in a digital world run by large tech companies.","PeriodicalId":48238,"journal":{"name":"Organization","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084241246073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study tells the story of two public transport authorities (PTA) in Sweden who developed their own apps. Although this might seem trivial and far-detached from the critical issues discussed in organization studies, this story raises questions of great relevance for this field, namely how digital sovereignty is organized. Digital sovereignty refers to governments trying to take or regain power and control over “the digital,” which a small group of large tech companies have monopolized. Drawing on a 3 year qualitative study of app making, and using assemblage theory, this study shows that digital sovereignty is not only about controlling software development or data ownership, but also about re-configuring the organization in relation to digital artifacts such as apps. By bypassing procurement procedures and paralleling their IT-departments, the PTAs here display how digital sovereignty comes from “below,” originating from frustrated civil servants within the public authorities who literally tried to “byte back” in a digital world run by large tech companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制作应用程序,拥有数据:数字主权与公共当局的 "字节 "回溯安排
本研究讲述了瑞典两个公共交通管理局(PTA)开发自己应用程序的故事。虽然这看起来微不足道,而且与组织研究中讨论的关键问题相去甚远,但这个故事提出了与该领域密切相关的问题,即数字主权是如何组织起来的。数字主权指的是政府试图夺取或重新夺回对 "数字 "的权力和控制,而 "数字 "已被一小部分大型科技公司所垄断。本研究通过对应用程序制作进行为期 3 年的定性研究,并运用组合理论,表明数字主权不仅涉及控制软件开发或数据所有权,还涉及重新配置与应用程序等数字人工制品相关的组织。通过绕过采购程序并与信息技术部门并行,PTAs 展示了数字主权是如何从 "下层 "产生的,它源于公共机构中沮丧的公务员,他们试图在一个由大型科技公司运营的数字世界中 "反击"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organization
Organization MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The journal encompasses the full range of key theoretical, methodological and substantive debates and developments in organizational analysis, broadly conceived, identifying and assessing their impacts on organizational practices worldwide. Alongside more micro-processual analyses, it particularly encourages attention to the links between intellectual developments, changes in organizational forms and practices, and broader social, cultural and institutional transformations.
期刊最新文献
Alter-anthropological thought in organization studies From anti-state Nazism to neo-bureaucracy? Media Review: Lupin: Eradicating the stereotype of the African immigrant Carta Aberta: (In)visibilizing transgender bodies in organizations Rethinking organization studies methods through a posthumanist epistemology of practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1