Establishing Component-to-Composite Textual Responses: A Common Obstacle in Learning to Read

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Behavioral Education Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1007/s10864-024-09546-8
Katharine Loomis, R. Douglas Greer
{"title":"Establishing Component-to-Composite Textual Responses: A Common Obstacle in Learning to Read","authors":"Katharine Loomis, R. Douglas Greer","doi":"10.1007/s10864-024-09546-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A common difficulty in introducing reading instruction involves teaching students to blend letter sounds to form words. Often, this difficulty can occur with and without textual stimuli. In 2 experiments, we tested the effects of behavioral momentum blending on acquisition of textual and spelling responses with 11 preschool students. The 3- and 4-year-old participants presented with language and social delays and were selected due to their explicit difficulty in blending as beginning readers. Prior to intervention, we taught participants to rapidly respond to mastered words with up to 5 phoneme–grapheme correspondences. During intervention, textual responses to mastered words were followed by the presentation of a novel word. Participants heard vocal models of component phonemes prior to requiring a blended textual response; models and the behavioral momentum antecedents were faded within sessions. Dependent measures consisted of novel textual and spelling responses and vocally blended responses. In Experiment 2, we added a response-to-extinction measure to compare the reinforcing value of observing text prior to and following intervention. Increases in textual and spelling responses occurred for all participants as well as a shift in reinforcement value in Experiment 2. Results highlight the educational significance of blending when establishing textual responding.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-024-09546-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A common difficulty in introducing reading instruction involves teaching students to blend letter sounds to form words. Often, this difficulty can occur with and without textual stimuli. In 2 experiments, we tested the effects of behavioral momentum blending on acquisition of textual and spelling responses with 11 preschool students. The 3- and 4-year-old participants presented with language and social delays and were selected due to their explicit difficulty in blending as beginning readers. Prior to intervention, we taught participants to rapidly respond to mastered words with up to 5 phoneme–grapheme correspondences. During intervention, textual responses to mastered words were followed by the presentation of a novel word. Participants heard vocal models of component phonemes prior to requiring a blended textual response; models and the behavioral momentum antecedents were faded within sessions. Dependent measures consisted of novel textual and spelling responses and vocally blended responses. In Experiment 2, we added a response-to-extinction measure to compare the reinforcing value of observing text prior to and following intervention. Increases in textual and spelling responses occurred for all participants as well as a shift in reinforcement value in Experiment 2. Results highlight the educational significance of blending when establishing textual responding.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立从成分到成分的文本反应:学习阅读的常见障碍
在引入阅读教学时,一个常见的困难是教学生把字母的读音混合起来组成单词。通常情况下,无论是否有文字刺激,都会出现这种困难。在两项实验中,我们测试了行为动量混合对 11 名学龄前学生掌握文字和拼写反应的影响。这些 3 岁和 4 岁的参与者在语言和社交方面都有障碍,之所以被选中,是因为他们作为初学者在混合阅读方面有明显的困难。在进行干预之前,我们教参与者对掌握的单词进行快速反应,最多可达 5 个音素-词素对应。在干预过程中,在对掌握的单词做出文字反应后,我们会向学员展示一个新单词。在要求学员做出混合文本反应之前,学员会听到音素成分的声音模型;模型和行为动力前因后果会在课程中逐渐消失。依赖性测量包括新颖的文字和拼写反应以及声音混合反应。在实验 2 中,我们增加了一项 "反应到消退 "测量,以比较干预前后观察文本的强化价值。在实验 2 中,所有参与者的文字和拼写反应都有所增加,强化价值也发生了变化。实验结果凸显了在建立文本反应时混合的教育意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Education
Journal of Behavioral Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Education is an international forum dedicated to publishing original research papers on the application of behavioral principles and technology to education. Education is defined broadly and the journal places no restriction on the types of participants involved in the reported studies--including by age, ability, or setting. Each quarterly issue presents empirical research investigating best-practices and innovative methods to address a wide range of educational targets and issues pertaining to the needs of diverse learners and to implementation. The Journal of Behavioral Education is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal whose target audience is educational researchers and practitioners including general and special education teachers, school psychologists, and other school personnel.  Rigorous experimental designs, including single-subject with replication and group designs are considered for publication. An emphasis is placed on direct observation measures of the primary dependent variable in studies of educational issues, problems, and practices.  Discussion articles and critical reviews also are published.
期刊最新文献
Using Constant Time Delay to Teach Sight Words to Students Identified as Deafblind Applying “Mastery” Criteria to Sets and Individual Operants: A Replication with Preschoolers with Disabilities The Effect of a Tiered Professional Development Framework on Check-In/Check-Out Treatment Fidelity Efficiency and Child Preference for Specific Prompting Procedures Social and Ecological Validity of the Good Behavior Game: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1