The Effect of a Tiered Professional Development Framework on Check-In/Check-Out Treatment Fidelity

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Behavioral Education Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1007/s10864-024-09566-4
Mark D. Samudre, Lauren M. LeJeune, Jacqueline Viotto
{"title":"The Effect of a Tiered Professional Development Framework on Check-In/Check-Out Treatment Fidelity","authors":"Mark D. Samudre, Lauren M. LeJeune, Jacqueline Viotto","doi":"10.1007/s10864-024-09566-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Check-in/Check-out (CICO) is a commonly implemented Tier 2 behavioral support. Procedures include an adult mentor facilitating a morning (i.e., check-in) and afternoon (i.e., check-out) session with a student they are supporting and teachers providing points based on the student’s performance across academic blocks. In this study, we evaluated the effect of a three-tiered system for professional development (i.e., multitiered system for professional development [MTS-PD]) on adult mentors’ treatment fidelity of CICO sessions in the context of a multiple-baseline single-case research design across participants. Results indicated that treatment fidelity data were low immediately following MTS-PD Tier 1. A functional relation was evident between MTS-PD Tier 2 and increases in adult mentors’ fidelity. Specifically, one adult mentor was responsive to MTS-PD Tier 1 and three adult mentors required additional implementation support (i.e., MTS-PD Tier 2). Student responsiveness to CICO was variable. We discuss findings and implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Education","volume":"22 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-024-09566-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Check-in/Check-out (CICO) is a commonly implemented Tier 2 behavioral support. Procedures include an adult mentor facilitating a morning (i.e., check-in) and afternoon (i.e., check-out) session with a student they are supporting and teachers providing points based on the student’s performance across academic blocks. In this study, we evaluated the effect of a three-tiered system for professional development (i.e., multitiered system for professional development [MTS-PD]) on adult mentors’ treatment fidelity of CICO sessions in the context of a multiple-baseline single-case research design across participants. Results indicated that treatment fidelity data were low immediately following MTS-PD Tier 1. A functional relation was evident between MTS-PD Tier 2 and increases in adult mentors’ fidelity. Specifically, one adult mentor was responsive to MTS-PD Tier 1 and three adult mentors required additional implementation support (i.e., MTS-PD Tier 2). Student responsiveness to CICO was variable. We discuss findings and implications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分层专业发展框架对签到/签出治疗忠诚度的影响
签到/签退(CICO)是一种普遍实施的二级行为支持。其程序包括一名成人辅导员在上午(即签到)和下午(即签退)对其所辅导的学生进行辅导,而教师则根据学生在各学段的表现提供分数。在本研究中,我们评估了三层专业发展体系(即多层专业发展体系 [MTS-PD])对成人导师在 CICO 课程中的治疗忠实度的影响。结果表明,在 MTS-PD 第一级课程结束后,治疗忠实度数据较低。MTS-PD 第 2 级与成人辅导员忠实度的提高之间存在明显的功能关系。具体来说,一名成人导师对 MTS-PD 第一级做出了反应,三名成人导师需要额外的实施支持(即 MTS-PD 第二级)。学生对 CICO 的反应不一。我们将讨论研究结果和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Education
Journal of Behavioral Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Education is an international forum dedicated to publishing original research papers on the application of behavioral principles and technology to education. Education is defined broadly and the journal places no restriction on the types of participants involved in the reported studies--including by age, ability, or setting. Each quarterly issue presents empirical research investigating best-practices and innovative methods to address a wide range of educational targets and issues pertaining to the needs of diverse learners and to implementation. The Journal of Behavioral Education is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal whose target audience is educational researchers and practitioners including general and special education teachers, school psychologists, and other school personnel.  Rigorous experimental designs, including single-subject with replication and group designs are considered for publication. An emphasis is placed on direct observation measures of the primary dependent variable in studies of educational issues, problems, and practices.  Discussion articles and critical reviews also are published.
期刊最新文献
Using Constant Time Delay to Teach Sight Words to Students Identified as Deafblind Applying “Mastery” Criteria to Sets and Individual Operants: A Replication with Preschoolers with Disabilities The Effect of a Tiered Professional Development Framework on Check-In/Check-Out Treatment Fidelity Efficiency and Child Preference for Specific Prompting Procedures Social and Ecological Validity of the Good Behavior Game: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1