Bilingual oral language development among dual language immersion students: Use of a Bayesian approach with language learning progressions

IF 2.4 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Applied Psycholinguistics Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1017/s0142716424000067
Ève Ryan, Preston Botter, Michelle L. Luna, Alison L. Bailey, Clémence Darriet
{"title":"Bilingual oral language development among dual language immersion students: Use of a Bayesian approach with language learning progressions","authors":"Ève Ryan, Preston Botter, Michelle L. Luna, Alison L. Bailey, Clémence Darriet","doi":"10.1017/s0142716424000067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dual language development of dual language immersion (DLI) students, although often examined at the domain level (e.g., listening or reading), remains understudied for more specific skills (e.g., word, sentence, or discourse). This study examines the eleven-month progression of oral language skills in a picture description task in two languages (French and English) for early-elementary (Transitional Kindergarten through first grade) DLI students (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 42). Using Bayesian methods, which estimate parameters using both the data and prior information, we describe French and English growth patterns as measured by learning progressions whose focus is on language features at the word, sentence, and discourse levels. For French oral language, we found evidence of meaningful positive linear growth for all language features, whereas for English oral language, meaningful linear positive growth was only detected for sophistication of topic vocabulary. Overall, coming from a French-speaking household was associated with steeper French oral language trajectories, but coming from an English-only household did not specifically impact English oral language trajectories. In both languages, grade level influenced the trajectories of some—but not all—features. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications, advocating for a language progression approach in instruction and research on bilingualism.","PeriodicalId":48065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psycholinguistics","volume":"30 10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716424000067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dual language development of dual language immersion (DLI) students, although often examined at the domain level (e.g., listening or reading), remains understudied for more specific skills (e.g., word, sentence, or discourse). This study examines the eleven-month progression of oral language skills in a picture description task in two languages (French and English) for early-elementary (Transitional Kindergarten through first grade) DLI students (N = 42). Using Bayesian methods, which estimate parameters using both the data and prior information, we describe French and English growth patterns as measured by learning progressions whose focus is on language features at the word, sentence, and discourse levels. For French oral language, we found evidence of meaningful positive linear growth for all language features, whereas for English oral language, meaningful linear positive growth was only detected for sophistication of topic vocabulary. Overall, coming from a French-speaking household was associated with steeper French oral language trajectories, but coming from an English-only household did not specifically impact English oral language trajectories. In both languages, grade level influenced the trajectories of some—but not all—features. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications, advocating for a language progression approach in instruction and research on bilingualism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双语沉浸式学生的双语口语发展:贝叶斯方法与语言学习进展的应用
浸入式双语教学(DLI)学生的双语发展虽然经常在领域层面(如听力或阅读)进行研究,但对更具体的技能(如单词、句子或话语)的研究仍然不足。本研究以两种语言(法语和英语)对小学低年级(幼儿园过渡班至一年级)DLI 学生(42 人)进行图片描述任务,考察其口语技能在 11 个月内的进步情况。我们采用贝叶斯方法(利用数据和先验信息估计参数),描述了法语和英语的成长模式,这些模式是通过学习进度来衡量的,其重点是单词、句子和话语层面的语言特点。就法语口语而言,我们发现所有语言特征都出现了有意义的线性正增长,而就英语口语而言,只有主题词汇的复杂性出现了有意义的线性正增长。总体而言,来自讲法语的家庭与更陡峭的法语口语发展轨迹有关,但来自纯英语家庭对英语口语发展轨迹没有具体影响。在两种语言中,年级水平都会影响部分(而非全部)特征的发展轨迹。最后,我们提出了理论和实践意义,主张在双语教学和研究中采用语言渐进方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Applied Psycholinguistics publishes original research papers on the psychological processes involved in language. It examines language development , language use and language disorders in adults and children with a particular emphasis on cross-language studies. The journal gathers together the best work from a variety of disciplines including linguistics, psychology, reading, education, language learning, speech and hearing, and neurology. In addition to research reports, theoretical reviews will be considered for publication as will keynote articles and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Does perceptual high variability phonetic training improve L2 speech production? A meta-analysis of perception-production connection You might want to tone down your advice: An experimental investigation of the speech act of advice in French What contributes to fluent L2 speech? Examining cognitive and utterance fluency link with underlying L2 collocational processing speed and accuracy Language anxiety does not affect the growth of L2 reading achievement: The latent growth curve model approach Shared representations in cognate comprehension and production: An online picture naming and lexical decision study with bilingual children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1