The ability of different compositions of calcium silicate and epoxy sealers to withstand gutta percha removal via in vitro pull-out testing

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BDJ Open Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1038/s41405-024-00212-9
Idan Stiklaru, Ella Lalum, Sobhi Hamoud, Maayan Paz, Avi Levin, Joe Ben Itzhak, Nirit Yavnai, Pavel Gorenbein, Michael Solomonov
{"title":"The ability of different compositions of calcium silicate and epoxy sealers to withstand gutta percha removal via in vitro pull-out testing","authors":"Idan Stiklaru, Ella Lalum, Sobhi Hamoud, Maayan Paz, Avi Levin, Joe Ben Itzhak, Nirit Yavnai, Pavel Gorenbein, Michael Solomonov","doi":"10.1038/s41405-024-00212-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>examination of the influence of chemical composition changes on the ability of sealers to withstand a pull-out test.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>Fifty distal or palatal canals of extracted teeth were prepared by Dc Taper files. The teeth were divided into five groups: AH Plus, BJM RCS, Total Fill BC,AH Plus Bioceramic and a group with Gutta Percha with no sealer added. Ten days after obturation, each cone was subjected to the “pull-out test” with the Shimadzo Universal Testing Machine until it was torn or removed from the canal. A force to Stroke graph was generated and the maximum vertex of this graph was recorded. The number of times the cone was torn or removed was recorded.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The amount of force needed to remove or rupture the cone was significantly higher in all sealer groups compared to the AH Plus Bioceramic group. The force needed for the AH Plus group was double that needed for the AH Plus Bioceramic group 4 (1.87 ± 0.53 N vs 0.93 ± 0.48 N, respectively, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). All of the cones (<i>n</i> = 10) in the AH Plus Bio Ceramic Sealer group were removed in their entirety (<i>P</i> = 0.01 compared to each of the other groups).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The addition of macromolecules to epoxy sealer does not change the material’s ability to withstand the pull-out test. Decreasing the amount of tri- and di-calcium silicate compounds combined with increasing amounts of zirconium oxide in a Bioceramic sealer significantly decreased the material’s ability to withstand the pull-out test.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00212-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

examination of the influence of chemical composition changes on the ability of sealers to withstand a pull-out test.

Materials and methods

Fifty distal or palatal canals of extracted teeth were prepared by Dc Taper files. The teeth were divided into five groups: AH Plus, BJM RCS, Total Fill BC,AH Plus Bioceramic and a group with Gutta Percha with no sealer added. Ten days after obturation, each cone was subjected to the “pull-out test” with the Shimadzo Universal Testing Machine until it was torn or removed from the canal. A force to Stroke graph was generated and the maximum vertex of this graph was recorded. The number of times the cone was torn or removed was recorded.

Results

The amount of force needed to remove or rupture the cone was significantly higher in all sealer groups compared to the AH Plus Bioceramic group. The force needed for the AH Plus group was double that needed for the AH Plus Bioceramic group 4 (1.87 ± 0.53 N vs 0.93 ± 0.48 N, respectively, P < 0.001). All of the cones (n = 10) in the AH Plus Bio Ceramic Sealer group were removed in their entirety (P = 0.01 compared to each of the other groups).

Conclusions

The addition of macromolecules to epoxy sealer does not change the material’s ability to withstand the pull-out test. Decreasing the amount of tri- and di-calcium silicate compounds combined with increasing amounts of zirconium oxide in a Bioceramic sealer significantly decreased the material’s ability to withstand the pull-out test.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过体外拉出试验,测试不同成分的硅酸钙和环氧树脂密封剂耐受古塔胶去除的能力
材料和方法用 Dc 锥形锉制备 50 个拔牙远端或腭管。这些牙齿被分为五组:AH Plus组、BJM RCS组、Total Fill BC组、AH Plus Bioceramic组和未添加封闭剂的Gutta Percha组。封闭十天后,使用岛津万能试验机对每个锥体进行 "拔出试验",直到锥体被撕裂或从牙道中拔出。生成力-行程图,并记录该图的最大顶点。结果与 AH Plus 生物陶瓷组相比,所有封闭剂组移除或破裂锥体所需的力都明显较高。AH Plus 组所需的力是 AH Plus 生物陶瓷 4 组的两倍(分别为 1.87 ± 0.53 N vs 0.93 ± 0.48 N,P < 0.001)。AH Plus 生物陶瓷密封剂组中的所有锥体(n = 10)都被全部拔出(与其他各组相比,P = 0.01)。在生物陶瓷封闭剂中减少三硅酸钙和二硅酸钙化合物的用量,同时增加氧化锆的用量,会显著降低材料的抗拉测试能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison between AH plus sealer and total fill bioceramic sealer performance in previously untreated and retreatment cases of maxillary incisors with large-sized periapical lesion: a randomized controlled trial Impact of LASER activated irrigation on the retrievability of Guttaflow bioseal (in-vitro study) SWOT analysis of the dental hygiene profession in Pakistan-past, present, and future. Comparing efficacies of various papain-based enzyme agents and 2.4% sodium hypochlorite gel in chemomechanical caries removal: a randomized controlled trial. Does strontium coated titanium implants enhance the osseointegration in animal models under osteoporotic condition? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1