Resilience in Aging: An Interdisciplinary Approach From Childhood to Adulthood

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of gerontological nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.3928/00989134-20240319-01
Donna M. Fick, PhD, GCNS-BC, AGSF, FGSA, FAAN
{"title":"Resilience in Aging: An Interdisciplinary Approach From Childhood to Adulthood","authors":"Donna M. Fick, PhD, GCNS-BC, AGSF, FGSA, FAAN","doi":"10.3928/00989134-20240319-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Introduction</h2><p><i>One thing I have learned about revision is that sometimes I need to go back in order to move forward. Sometimes I need to return to those earlier versions—one, two, three—to find the spark that drove me to the page in the first place. What can I excavate from those earlier versions? What necessary fire can I restore to the present iteration?</i></p><span><i>(Smith, 2020, p. 10).</i></span><p>As an editor, this quote speaks to me about writing and life, and recently came to my thoughts while attending a conference on resilience. It reminds me that our earlier lives and iterations of who we were and what we experience impact us as we age.</p><p>Are there individualized paths to resilience? What is common about resilience versus other concepts and what is unique? How do childhood risk factors, including victimization and trauma, impact aging? What about those individuals who show extreme resilience to early life adversity? How does that impact resilience as we age? How do we support resilience across the lifespan? How do we address diversity and equity in resilience? How do we integrate genetics into resilience and what is the clinical utility of current tools? Can caregiving be a positive factor for resilience?</p><p>These are just a few of the questions that were pondered at the recent Bench-to-Bedside Conference Series: Stress Tests and Biomarkers of Resilience held on March 3–5, 2024, supported by the National Institute on Aging and the American Geriatrics Society (AGS). I was honored to attend as part of my role as AGS President and as a National Institutes of Health–funded nurse scientist investigating delirium and delirium in persons with dementia. My own work in persons with delirium and dementia focuses on knowing the person to understand the disease and wellness and emphasizes looking for resilience and observing and documenting the strengths of older adults and persons with disabilities (Fick, 2022).</p><p>This was the second conference in a series of three led by resilience researchers across disciplines from pediatrics to geriatrics, psychology, genetics, sociology, epidemiology, neurology, nursing, and others. The first conference in 2022 explored commonalities and differences among the frameworks of resilience most commonly used in aging research in the three domains of resilience: physical, cognitive, and psychosocial. A meeting summary was published in the August issue of the <i>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</i> (Abadir et al., 2023). Themes of the first conference included underlying contributors to resilience, the dynamic nature of resilience throughout the life span, and the role of resilience in health equity. Although participants did not agree on a single definition of “resilience(s),” they identified common and unique features of resilience to add to a definition. The first conference led to multiple recommendations, including new longitudinal studies of the impact of exposures to stressors on resilience in older adults, preclinical models for resilience research, translational research to bring findings on resilience to patient care, and others. The current conference furthered this work with more presentations on topics such as measuring resilience through time series data, biomarkers and their utility, social and psychological impacts on resiliency, proteomics, childhood trauma, and others. We can look forward to a conference summary being published in the near future and another conference on interventions in 2025.</p><p>The most wonderful thing about these conferences for me is participating in round table discussions and mentoring breakfasts with future scholars who will carry this research forward (and perhaps at times return to their own earlier iterations of life to find their fire)—rising stars across all disciplines, junior faculty, and clinicians interacting with more senior researchers and NIH staff—all filled with passion for this work. For me, the measure of a successful conference is leaving wanting more and hoping to be invited back in 2025. I challenge you to think about how resilience fits in with your own work.</p><p><strong>Donna M. Fick, PhD, GCNS-BC, AGSF,</strong></p><p><strong>FGSA, FAAN</strong></p><p>Editor</p><p></p><ul><li><span><span>Abadir P. M., Bandeen-Roche K., Bergeman C., Bennett D., Davis D., Kind A., LeBrasseur N., Stern Y., Varadhan R., &amp; Whitson H. E.</span> (<span>2023</span>). <span>An overview of the resilience world: Proceedings of the American Geriatrics Society and National Institute on Aging State of Resilience Science Conference</span>. <span><i>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</i></span>, <i>71</i>(8), 2381–2392. <pub-id pub-id-type=\"doi\">10.1111/jgs.18388</pub-id> </span><p></p>&gt; <span> Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar</span></li><li><span><span>Fick D. M.</span> (<span>2022</span>). <span>Knowing the older adult with delirium superimposed on dementia</span>. <span><i>American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry</i></span>, <i>30</i>(10), 1079–1082. <pub-id pub-id-type=\"doi\">10.1016/j.jagp.2022.06.003</pub-id> </span><p></p>&gt; <span> Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar</span></li><li><span><span>Smith M</span>. (<span>2020</span>). <span><i>Keep moving: Notes on loss, creativity, and change</i></span>. <span>Atria/One Signal Publishers</span>. </span><p></p>&gt; <span>Google Scholar</span></li></ul>","PeriodicalId":15848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gerontological nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gerontological nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20240319-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

One thing I have learned about revision is that sometimes I need to go back in order to move forward. Sometimes I need to return to those earlier versions—one, two, three—to find the spark that drove me to the page in the first place. What can I excavate from those earlier versions? What necessary fire can I restore to the present iteration?

(Smith, 2020, p. 10).

As an editor, this quote speaks to me about writing and life, and recently came to my thoughts while attending a conference on resilience. It reminds me that our earlier lives and iterations of who we were and what we experience impact us as we age.

Are there individualized paths to resilience? What is common about resilience versus other concepts and what is unique? How do childhood risk factors, including victimization and trauma, impact aging? What about those individuals who show extreme resilience to early life adversity? How does that impact resilience as we age? How do we support resilience across the lifespan? How do we address diversity and equity in resilience? How do we integrate genetics into resilience and what is the clinical utility of current tools? Can caregiving be a positive factor for resilience?

These are just a few of the questions that were pondered at the recent Bench-to-Bedside Conference Series: Stress Tests and Biomarkers of Resilience held on March 3–5, 2024, supported by the National Institute on Aging and the American Geriatrics Society (AGS). I was honored to attend as part of my role as AGS President and as a National Institutes of Health–funded nurse scientist investigating delirium and delirium in persons with dementia. My own work in persons with delirium and dementia focuses on knowing the person to understand the disease and wellness and emphasizes looking for resilience and observing and documenting the strengths of older adults and persons with disabilities (Fick, 2022).

This was the second conference in a series of three led by resilience researchers across disciplines from pediatrics to geriatrics, psychology, genetics, sociology, epidemiology, neurology, nursing, and others. The first conference in 2022 explored commonalities and differences among the frameworks of resilience most commonly used in aging research in the three domains of resilience: physical, cognitive, and psychosocial. A meeting summary was published in the August issue of the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Abadir et al., 2023). Themes of the first conference included underlying contributors to resilience, the dynamic nature of resilience throughout the life span, and the role of resilience in health equity. Although participants did not agree on a single definition of “resilience(s),” they identified common and unique features of resilience to add to a definition. The first conference led to multiple recommendations, including new longitudinal studies of the impact of exposures to stressors on resilience in older adults, preclinical models for resilience research, translational research to bring findings on resilience to patient care, and others. The current conference furthered this work with more presentations on topics such as measuring resilience through time series data, biomarkers and their utility, social and psychological impacts on resiliency, proteomics, childhood trauma, and others. We can look forward to a conference summary being published in the near future and another conference on interventions in 2025.

The most wonderful thing about these conferences for me is participating in round table discussions and mentoring breakfasts with future scholars who will carry this research forward (and perhaps at times return to their own earlier iterations of life to find their fire)—rising stars across all disciplines, junior faculty, and clinicians interacting with more senior researchers and NIH staff—all filled with passion for this work. For me, the measure of a successful conference is leaving wanting more and hoping to be invited back in 2025. I challenge you to think about how resilience fits in with your own work.

Donna M. Fick, PhD, GCNS-BC, AGSF,

FGSA, FAAN

Editor

  • Abadir P. M., Bandeen-Roche K., Bergeman C., Bennett D., Davis D., Kind A., LeBrasseur N., Stern Y., Varadhan R., & Whitson H. E. (2023). An overview of the resilience world: Proceedings of the American Geriatrics Society and National Institute on Aging State of Resilience Science Conference. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 71(8), 2381–2392. 10.1111/jgs.18388

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Fick D. M. (2022). Knowing the older adult with delirium superimposed on dementia. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 30(10), 1079–1082. 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.06.003

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M. (2020). Keep moving: Notes on loss, creativity, and change. Atria/One Signal Publishers.

    > Google Scholar
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衰老中的复原力:从童年到成年的跨学科方法
导言:关于修改,我学到的一点是,有时我需要回到过去,以便继续前进。有时,我需要回到那些早期版本,如第一版、第二版、第三版,以找到当初促使我动笔的火花。我能从这些早期版本中挖掘出什么?史密斯,2020 年,第 10 页)。作为一名编辑,这句话对我的写作和生活很有启发,最近在参加一个关于复原力的会议时,我突然想到了这句话。它提醒我,随着年龄的增长,我们早年的生活和经历会对我们产生影响。与其他概念相比,抗逆力有哪些共性和独特性?童年的风险因素(包括受害和创伤)如何影响衰老?那些在早期生活逆境中表现出极强复原力的人又会怎样?随着年龄的增长,这对复原力有何影响?我们如何支持整个生命周期的复原力?我们如何解决复原力的多样性和公平性问题?我们如何将遗传学与抗逆力结合起来,现有工具的临床实用性如何?护理能否成为提高复原力的积极因素?这些只是最近举行的 "从实验室到临床 "系列会议上思考的几个问题:2024 年 3 月 3-5 日,在美国国家老龄问题研究所(National Institute on Aging)和美国老年医学会(American Geriatrics Society,AGS)的支持下,举办了 "压力测试和复原力生物标志物"(Stress Tests and Biomarkers of Resilience)系列会议。作为 AGS 主席和美国国立卫生研究院资助的研究痴呆症患者谵妄和谵妄的护士科学家,我很荣幸能够参加此次会议。我本人在谵妄和痴呆症患者方面的工作侧重于了解患者以了解疾病和健康状况,并强调寻找老年人和残障人士的复原力以及观察和记录他们的长处(Fick,2022 年)。这是复原力研究人员领导的系列会议中的第二次会议,这些研究人员来自儿科、老年医学、心理学、遗传学、社会学、流行病学、神经学、护理学等多个学科。2022 年举行的第一次会议探讨了老龄化研究中最常用的抗逆力框架在身体、认知和社会心理这三个抗逆力领域的共性和差异。会议摘要发表在 8 月份的《美国老年医学会杂志》上(Abadir 等人,2023 年)。第一次会议的主题包括抗逆力的基本促成因素、抗逆力在整个生命周期中的动态性质以及抗逆力在健康公平中的作用。尽管与会者并未就 "抗逆力 "的单一定义达成一致,但他们指出了抗逆力的共同特征和独特特征,以补充到定义中。第一次会议提出了多项建议,包括就压力暴露对老年人复原力的影响开展新的纵向研究、复原力研究的临床前模型、将复原力研究成果应用于患者护理的转化研究等。本届会议进一步推进了这项工作,就通过时间序列数据测量复原力、生物标志物及其效用、社会和心理对复原力的影响、蛋白质组学、儿童创伤等主题进行了更多的发言。对我来说,参加这些会议最美妙的事情就是参加圆桌讨论和指导早餐会,与未来的学者们一起将这项研究推向前进(有时也许会回到自己生命的早期迭代中去寻找自己的火种)--这些学者包括各学科的后起之秀、初级教师和临床医生,他们与更资深的研究人员和美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的工作人员进行互动--所有人都对这项工作充满热情。对我来说,衡量一次会议成功与否的标准是,与会人员离开时还意犹未尽,并希望2025年能再次受邀与会。Donna M. Fick, PhD, GCNS-BC, AGSF,FGSA, FAANEditorAbadir P. M., Bandeen-Roche K., Bergeman C., Bennett D., Davis D., Kind A., LeBrasseur N., Stern Y., Varadhan R., & Whitson H. E. (2023)。复原力世界概览》:美国老年医学学会和国家老龄问题研究所复原力科学状况会议记录》。美国老年医学会杂志》,71(8),2381-2392。10.1111/jgs.18388 > Crossref MedlineGoogle ScholarFick D. M. (2022).了解谵妄叠加痴呆的老年人。美国老年精神病学杂志》,30(10),1079-1082。10.1016/j.jagp.2022.06.003 > Crossref MedlineGoogle ScholarSmith M. (2020).Keep moving:关于损失、创造力和变化的笔记》。Atria/One Signal Publishers.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontological Nursing is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing clinically relevant original articles on the practice of gerontological nursing across the continuum of care in a variety of health care settings, for more than 40 years.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Family Caregivers of Older Adults With Dementia in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis. Feasibility of Fall-Risk Detection in Older Adults: Real-World Use of Sensor Data With Machine Learning. Feasibility of Whole-Body Resistance Training With Social Support Reinforcement for Older Adults Living Alone: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study. Gerontological Nurses' Civic Duty: Impact of November's Election on Rural Health and Older Adults. Nurses' Provision of Sexual and Reproductive Health to Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1