Differentiating Bagasse and Straw as Feedstocks for Sugarcane Cellulosic Ethanol: Insights from Pilot-Scale Pretreatments

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS BioEnergy Research Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1007/s12155-024-10751-6
Viviane M. Nascimento, Simone C. Nakanishi, Carlos Alberto de Oliveira Filho, Absai da Conceição Gomes, Aline Machado de Castro, Ana Paula Rodrigues Torres, Christian Alejandro Queipo, Danuza Nogueira Moyses, Felipe de Oliveira Brito, Luiz Fernando Martins Bandeira, Carlos Driemeier
{"title":"Differentiating Bagasse and Straw as Feedstocks for Sugarcane Cellulosic Ethanol: Insights from Pilot-Scale Pretreatments","authors":"Viviane M. Nascimento,&nbsp;Simone C. Nakanishi,&nbsp;Carlos Alberto de Oliveira Filho,&nbsp;Absai da Conceição Gomes,&nbsp;Aline Machado de Castro,&nbsp;Ana Paula Rodrigues Torres,&nbsp;Christian Alejandro Queipo,&nbsp;Danuza Nogueira Moyses,&nbsp;Felipe de Oliveira Brito,&nbsp;Luiz Fernando Martins Bandeira,&nbsp;Carlos Driemeier","doi":"10.1007/s12155-024-10751-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bagasse and straw are the two feedstocks used to produce cellulosic ethanol from sugarcane. Although this technology is advancing commercially, the differentiation between bagasse and straw remains elusive. This work investigates bagasse and straw supply, conditioning, and pretreatment in a pilot-scale steam-explosion continuous reactor (~ 10 kg/h feed) to illuminate the critical feedstock differences for process scale-up. Evaluating biomass across four sequential harvest seasons (2018–2021) shows that straw supplied in bales requires extra conditioning to reduce mineral matter and particle size before feeding into the reactor. Moreover, straw composition is more variable and consistently has lower contents of glucan (35.6–38.8%) and carbohydrate potential (glucose + xylose, 649–704 kg/dry tonne) compared to bagasse (40.8–42.9%; 735–760 kg/dry tonne). Biomass pretreatments without (190 °C, 5–15 min) and with sulfuric acid catalyst (149–170 °C; 5–15 min; 0.5–5.12%, m/m) show that straw differs from bagasse by presenting a higher acid neutralization capacity and about 5% of labile glucans. These results suggest that straw crushing and aqueous pre-extraction are promising strategies to reduce the dissimilarities with bagasse, thus facilitating the development of feedstock-agnostic biorefining.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":487,"journal":{"name":"BioEnergy Research","volume":"17 3","pages":"1533 - 1542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioEnergy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10751-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bagasse and straw are the two feedstocks used to produce cellulosic ethanol from sugarcane. Although this technology is advancing commercially, the differentiation between bagasse and straw remains elusive. This work investigates bagasse and straw supply, conditioning, and pretreatment in a pilot-scale steam-explosion continuous reactor (~ 10 kg/h feed) to illuminate the critical feedstock differences for process scale-up. Evaluating biomass across four sequential harvest seasons (2018–2021) shows that straw supplied in bales requires extra conditioning to reduce mineral matter and particle size before feeding into the reactor. Moreover, straw composition is more variable and consistently has lower contents of glucan (35.6–38.8%) and carbohydrate potential (glucose + xylose, 649–704 kg/dry tonne) compared to bagasse (40.8–42.9%; 735–760 kg/dry tonne). Biomass pretreatments without (190 °C, 5–15 min) and with sulfuric acid catalyst (149–170 °C; 5–15 min; 0.5–5.12%, m/m) show that straw differs from bagasse by presenting a higher acid neutralization capacity and about 5% of labile glucans. These results suggest that straw crushing and aqueous pre-extraction are promising strategies to reduce the dissimilarities with bagasse, thus facilitating the development of feedstock-agnostic biorefining.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘蔗渣和秸秆作为甘蔗纤维素乙醇原料的区别:中试预处理的启示
甘蔗渣和秸秆是利用甘蔗生产纤维素乙醇的两种原料。尽管这项技术正在取得商业进展,但蔗渣和秸秆之间的区别仍然难以确定。这项研究调查了蔗渣和秸秆在中试规模蒸汽爆炸连续反应器(约 10 公斤/小时进料)中的供应、调节和预处理情况,以揭示工艺放大的关键原料差异。对四个连续收获季节(2018-2021 年)的生物质进行的评估表明,成捆供应的秸秆在送入反应器之前需要进行额外的调节,以减少矿物质和颗粒大小。此外,与甘蔗渣(40.8%-42.9%;735-760 千克/干吨)相比,秸秆成分变化更大,且葡聚糖(35.6%-38.8%)和碳水化合物潜能(葡萄糖+木糖,649-704 千克/干吨)含量始终较低。在不使用硫酸催化剂(190 °C,5-15 分钟)和使用硫酸催化剂(149-170 °C;5-15 分钟;0.5-5.12%,m/m)的情况下进行的生物质预处理表明,秸秆与甘蔗渣的不同之处在于,秸秆具有更高的酸中和能力以及约 5%的可溶性葡聚糖。这些结果表明,秸秆粉碎和水预萃取是减少与甘蔗渣相似性的有效策略,从而促进了原料生物炼制的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BioEnergy Research
BioEnergy Research ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioEnergy Research fills a void in the rapidly growing area of feedstock biology research related to biomass, biofuels, and bioenergy. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including peer-reviewed scientific research, reviews, perspectives and commentary, industry news, and government policy updates. Its coverage brings together a uniquely broad combination of disciplines with a common focus on feedstock biology and science, related to biomass, biofeedstock, and bioenergy production.
期刊最新文献
Third-Generation L-Lactic Acid Biorefinery Approaches: Exploring the Viability of Macroalgae Detritus Microalga Growth-Promoting Bacteria as Strategy to Improve CO2 Removal from Biogas Micro-Raman Spectroscopy Explains the Population-Scale Heterogeneity in Lipid Profile in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Cultivated Under Single-Stage and Two-Stage Salt Stress Exergy Analysis of Integrated Methanol and Dimethyl-Ether Co-production Towards Net Zero Waste Emission Biomass Valorization for Bioenergy Production: Current Techniques, Challenges, and Pathways to Solutions for Sustainable Bioeconomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1