Assessing primary healthcare disaster preparedness: a study in Northern Italy

Alessandro Lamberti-Castronuovo, Hamdi Lamine, Martina Valente, Ives Hubloue, Francesco Barone-Adesi, Luca Ragazzoni
{"title":"Assessing primary healthcare disaster preparedness: a study in Northern Italy","authors":"Alessandro Lamberti-Castronuovo, Hamdi Lamine, Martina Valente, Ives Hubloue, Francesco Barone-Adesi, Luca Ragazzoni","doi":"10.1017/s1463423624000124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this paper is to outline the steps taken to develop an operational checklist to assess primary healthcare (PHC) all-hazards disaster preparedness. It then describes a study testing the applicability of the checklist. Background: A PHC approach is an essential foundation for health emergency and disaster risk management (H-EDRM) because it can prevent and mitigate risks prior to disasters and support an effective response and recovery, thereby contributing to communities’ and countries’ resilience across the continuum of the disaster cycle. This approach is in line with the H-EDRM framework, published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019, which emphasizes a whole-of-health system approach in disaster management and highlights the importance of integrating PHC into countries’ H-EDRM. Nevertheless, literature focusing on how to practically integrate PHC into disaster management, both at the facility and at the policy level, is in its infancy. As of yet, there is no standardized, validated way to assess the specific characteristics that render PHC prepared for disasters nor a method to evaluate its role in H-EDRM. Methods: The checklist was developed through an iterative process that leveraged academic literature and expert consultations at different stages of the elaboration process. It was then used to assess primary care facilities in a province in Italy. Findings: The checklist offers a practical instrument for assessing and enhancing PHC disaster preparedness and for improving planning, coordination, and funding allocation. The study identified three critical areas for improvement in the province’s PHC disaster preparedness. First, primary care teams should be more interdisciplinary. Second, primary care services should be more thoroughly integrated into the broader health system. Third, there is a notable lack of awareness of H-EDRM principles among PHC professionals. In the future, the checklist can be elaborated into a weighted tool to be more broadly applicable.","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1463423624000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this paper is to outline the steps taken to develop an operational checklist to assess primary healthcare (PHC) all-hazards disaster preparedness. It then describes a study testing the applicability of the checklist. Background: A PHC approach is an essential foundation for health emergency and disaster risk management (H-EDRM) because it can prevent and mitigate risks prior to disasters and support an effective response and recovery, thereby contributing to communities’ and countries’ resilience across the continuum of the disaster cycle. This approach is in line with the H-EDRM framework, published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019, which emphasizes a whole-of-health system approach in disaster management and highlights the importance of integrating PHC into countries’ H-EDRM. Nevertheless, literature focusing on how to practically integrate PHC into disaster management, both at the facility and at the policy level, is in its infancy. As of yet, there is no standardized, validated way to assess the specific characteristics that render PHC prepared for disasters nor a method to evaluate its role in H-EDRM. Methods: The checklist was developed through an iterative process that leveraged academic literature and expert consultations at different stages of the elaboration process. It was then used to assess primary care facilities in a province in Italy. Findings: The checklist offers a practical instrument for assessing and enhancing PHC disaster preparedness and for improving planning, coordination, and funding allocation. The study identified three critical areas for improvement in the province’s PHC disaster preparedness. First, primary care teams should be more interdisciplinary. Second, primary care services should be more thoroughly integrated into the broader health system. Third, there is a notable lack of awareness of H-EDRM principles among PHC professionals. In the future, the checklist can be elaborated into a weighted tool to be more broadly applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估初级医疗保健的备灾情况:意大利北部的一项研究
目的:本文旨在概述制定用于评估初级医疗保健(PHC)各种灾害准备情况的操作清单所采取的步骤。然后介绍了一项测试核对表适用性的研究。背景:初级卫生保健(PHC)方法是卫生应急和灾害风险管理(H-EDRM)的重要基础,因为它可以在灾害发生前预防和减轻风险,并支持有效的响应和恢复,从而在灾害周期的整个过程中提高社区和国家的抗灾能力。这一方法与世界卫生组织(WHO)2019年发布的H-EDRM框架相一致,该框架强调灾害管理中的整体健康系统方法,并强调将初级保健纳入国家H-EDRM的重要性。然而,关于如何在设施和政策层面将初级保健切实纳入灾害管理的文献仍处于起步阶段。到目前为止,还没有一种标准化的、经过验证的方法来评估使初级保健为灾难做好准备的具体特征,也没有一种方法来评估初级保健在 H-EDRM 中的作用。方法:在制定过程的不同阶段,利用学术文献和专家咨询,通过迭代过程制定了核对表。然后用它来评估意大利某省的初级保健设施。研究结果该核对表为评估和加强初级卫生保健的备灾能力以及改进规划、协调和资金分配提供了一个实用工具。研究确定了该省初级保健灾难准备工作需要改进的三个关键领域。首先,初级保健团队应更具跨学科性。其次,初级保健服务应更彻底地融入更广泛的卫生系统。第三,初级保健专业人员明显缺乏对 H-EDRM 原则的认识。今后,可以将核对表细化为一个加权工具,使其具有更广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthy ageing in long-term care? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: a position paper. Early structured communication between general practitioner, sick-listed patient, and employer: Results and lessons learned from a pragmatic trial in the Capacity Note project. The impact of COVID-19 on referrals among general practitioners and specialists in Shanghai, China. The unrevealed links: periodontal health, human milk composition, and infant gut microbiome dynamics. Primary healthcare as a strategy for eliminating hepatitis C: the METRIC toolkit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1