Making way for the implementation of automated bee counters in regulatory risk assessment

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Applied Entomology Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1111/jen.13256
Richard Odemer, Oliver Jakoby, Markus Barth, Silvio Knäbe, Jens Pistorius, Katharina Schmidt
{"title":"Making way for the implementation of automated bee counters in regulatory risk assessment","authors":"Richard Odemer,&nbsp;Oliver Jakoby,&nbsp;Markus Barth,&nbsp;Silvio Knäbe,&nbsp;Jens Pistorius,&nbsp;Katharina Schmidt","doi":"10.1111/jen.13256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Measuring adverse effects on honey bees and their colonies requires a suitable methodology. For example, due to the large number of bees in a hive and the foraging activity, measuring the mortality of individuals is a difficult task that has not yet been adequately addressed. Knowing the natural daily mortality rate of a bee colony would be of great benefit in assessing whether and to what extent external influences and stress factors affect mortality. More precise mortality data could in turn help refining specific protection goals for regulatory purpose. The European Food Safety Authority recently published a document that estimated such mortality rates based on a systematic literature review, but none of these rates were assessed from continuous monitoring of colonies. Currently, bee mortality is routinely evaluated with various types of dead bee traps that prevent deceased bees from being removed from the colony. Both the literature review and the dead bee traps are relevant to regulatory risk assessment, but in our opinion are not describing the total mortality. Bee counters capable of precisely determining daily loss rates meet the above points and combine them with generating automated and continuous monitoring data. Lately, the field has gained a lot of importance in research and technological advances offer new possibilities in regulatory risk assessment. We will highlight these possibilities and discuss their future application in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Entomology","volume":"148 6","pages":"625-631"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jen.13256","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jen.13256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring adverse effects on honey bees and their colonies requires a suitable methodology. For example, due to the large number of bees in a hive and the foraging activity, measuring the mortality of individuals is a difficult task that has not yet been adequately addressed. Knowing the natural daily mortality rate of a bee colony would be of great benefit in assessing whether and to what extent external influences and stress factors affect mortality. More precise mortality data could in turn help refining specific protection goals for regulatory purpose. The European Food Safety Authority recently published a document that estimated such mortality rates based on a systematic literature review, but none of these rates were assessed from continuous monitoring of colonies. Currently, bee mortality is routinely evaluated with various types of dead bee traps that prevent deceased bees from being removed from the colony. Both the literature review and the dead bee traps are relevant to regulatory risk assessment, but in our opinion are not describing the total mortality. Bee counters capable of precisely determining daily loss rates meet the above points and combine them with generating automated and continuous monitoring data. Lately, the field has gained a lot of importance in research and technological advances offer new possibilities in regulatory risk assessment. We will highlight these possibilities and discuss their future application in practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为在监管风险评估中使用蜜蜂自动计数器铺平道路
测量对蜜蜂及其蜂群的不利影响需要合适的方法。例如,由于蜂巢中的蜜蜂数量众多,觅食活动频繁,测量个体死亡率是一项艰巨的任务,目前尚未得到充分解决。了解蜂群每天的自然死亡率,对于评估外部影响和压力因素是否会影响死亡率以及影响程度有很大帮助。更精确的死亡率数据反过来也有助于为监管目的完善具体的保护目标。欧洲食品安全局最近发布了一份文件,根据系统的文献综述估算了此类死亡率,但这些死亡率都不是通过对蜂群的持续监测来评估的。目前,对蜜蜂死亡率的常规评估是使用各种类型的死蜂诱捕器,防止将死亡的蜜蜂从蜂群中移出。文献综述和死蜂诱捕器都与监管风险评估有关,但我们认为它们并不能说明总死亡率。能够精确测定每日损失率的蜜蜂计数器符合上述观点,并能将其与生成自动和连续监测数据相结合。最近,该领域的研究越来越重要,技术进步为监管风险评估提供了新的可能性。我们将重点介绍这些可能性,并讨论其未来在实践中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Entomology publishes original articles on current research in applied entomology, including mites and spiders in terrestrial ecosystems. Submit your next manuscript for rapid publication: the average time is currently 6 months from submission to publication. With Journal of Applied Entomology''s dynamic article-by-article publication process, Early View, fully peer-reviewed and type-set articles are published online as soon as they complete, without waiting for full issue compilation.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Interannual and seasonal migratory patterns of wheat aphids across the Bohai Strait in eastern Asia Butterflies, bumblebees and hoverflies are equally effective pollinators of Knautia arvensis (Caprifoliaceae), a generalist plant species with compound inflorescences Impact of planting and harvest dates on yam infestation by white grubs Indoxacarb, cyantraniliprole, and Euborellia annulipes as options for integrated control of diamondback moth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1