‘Vote the Assholes Out’: How Value Congruence Work Aligns Stakeholders for Corporate Activism

IF 7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1111/joms.13068
Sean Buchanan, Mojtaba Mohammadnejad Shourkaei, Bruno Dyck
{"title":"‘Vote the Assholes Out’: How Value Congruence Work Aligns Stakeholders for Corporate Activism","authors":"Sean Buchanan, Mojtaba Mohammadnejad Shourkaei, Bruno Dyck","doi":"10.1111/joms.13068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research has pointed to value congruence between a firm and its stakeholders as a key driver of corporate socio‐political activism. However, this ‘stakeholder alignment’ model of corporate activism does not adequately explain how firms foster value congruence with their stakeholders. Drawing from an inductive study of Patagonia, Inc., we develop a social‐symbolic work perspective of stakeholder alignment for corporate activism by introducing the concept of ‘value congruence work’. Our findings demonstrate how <jats:italic>attractional</jats:italic> value congruence work aims to draw in stakeholders with similar values to engage with the firm, and <jats:italic>co‐evolutionary</jats:italic> value congruence work facilitates different forms of learning to sustain alignment between a firm and its stakeholders. Our findings offer new insights for research on corporate socio‐political activism and values work in organizations.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research has pointed to value congruence between a firm and its stakeholders as a key driver of corporate socio‐political activism. However, this ‘stakeholder alignment’ model of corporate activism does not adequately explain how firms foster value congruence with their stakeholders. Drawing from an inductive study of Patagonia, Inc., we develop a social‐symbolic work perspective of stakeholder alignment for corporate activism by introducing the concept of ‘value congruence work’. Our findings demonstrate how attractional value congruence work aims to draw in stakeholders with similar values to engage with the firm, and co‐evolutionary value congruence work facilitates different forms of learning to sustain alignment between a firm and its stakeholders. Our findings offer new insights for research on corporate socio‐political activism and values work in organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
淘汰混蛋":价值一致性工作如何让利益相关者参与企业激进主义
最近的研究指出,企业与其利益相关者之间的价值一致性是企业社会政治行动主义的主要驱动力。然而,这种企业激进主义的 "利益相关者一致性 "模型并不能充分解释企业如何促进与其利益相关者的价值一致性。通过对巴塔哥尼亚公司的归纳研究,我们提出了 "价值一致性工作 "的概念,从社会符号工作的角度来看待企业行动主义的利益相关者一致性。我们的研究结果表明,吸引性价值一致性工作旨在吸引具有相似价值观的利益相关者参与到企业中来,而共同进化性价值一致性工作则促进不同形式的学习,以维持企业与其利益相关者之间的一致性。我们的研究结果为企业社会政治行动主义和组织中的价值观工作研究提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Studies is a prestigious publication that specializes in multidisciplinary research in the field of business and management. With a rich history of excellence, we are dedicated to publishing innovative articles that contribute to the advancement of management and organization studies. Our journal welcomes empirical and conceptual contributions that are relevant to various areas including organization theory, organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation, and critical management studies. We embrace diversity and are open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information - Notes for Contributors Issue Information Issue Information - Notes for Contributors Business, Conflict, and Peace: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1