Seismic Discrimination Between Nuclear Explosions and Natural Earthquakes using Multi-Machine Learning Techniques

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS pure and applied geophysics Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1007/s00024-024-03463-7
Shimaa. H. Elkhouly, Ghada Ali
{"title":"Seismic Discrimination Between Nuclear Explosions and Natural Earthquakes using Multi-Machine Learning Techniques","authors":"Shimaa. H. Elkhouly, Ghada Ali","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03463-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the field of seismic signal analysis, it is of utmost importance to accurately differentiate between earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions. As a contribution for the verification regime of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), Various methods have been employed for this purpose, including Complexity, Spectral ratio, mb—Ms (body wave and surface wave magnitudes), and corner frequency of P and S waves. These discrimination techniques have been examined to manually identify natural seismic events from nuclear explosions across different regions worldwide, such as China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and the United States. To gather the necessary data, a comprehensive dataset comprising nuclear explosions and earthquakes of the same magnitude range (4 ≤ m<sub>b</sub> ≤ 6.5) of 35 seismic events from 1945 to 2017 has been compiled from the International Research Institute for Seismology (IRIS) using broadband and long period seismic stations. The objective of this study is to employ a range of linear and nonlinear Machine Learning (ML) models with the aim of automatically distinguishing between underground nuclear explosions and large earthquakes to enhance the accuracy of manual feature extraction. For this purpose, time domain waveforms and different classifier techniques focused on feature extraction have been used. The ML models employed include logistic regression, K-nearest neighbours classifier, decision tree classifier, random forest classifier, voting classifier, and Naive Bayes. The outcomes of the ROC and AUC analyses were employed to validate the validity of our proposed discrimination algorithm. The results show that the Random Forest Classifier is the most effective model, obtaining 100% accuracy in the case of feature extraction, while the best model for the time domain waveform classifier that achieved 75.5% accuracy is the voting classifier.</p>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03463-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of seismic signal analysis, it is of utmost importance to accurately differentiate between earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions. As a contribution for the verification regime of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), Various methods have been employed for this purpose, including Complexity, Spectral ratio, mb—Ms (body wave and surface wave magnitudes), and corner frequency of P and S waves. These discrimination techniques have been examined to manually identify natural seismic events from nuclear explosions across different regions worldwide, such as China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and the United States. To gather the necessary data, a comprehensive dataset comprising nuclear explosions and earthquakes of the same magnitude range (4 ≤ mb ≤ 6.5) of 35 seismic events from 1945 to 2017 has been compiled from the International Research Institute for Seismology (IRIS) using broadband and long period seismic stations. The objective of this study is to employ a range of linear and nonlinear Machine Learning (ML) models with the aim of automatically distinguishing between underground nuclear explosions and large earthquakes to enhance the accuracy of manual feature extraction. For this purpose, time domain waveforms and different classifier techniques focused on feature extraction have been used. The ML models employed include logistic regression, K-nearest neighbours classifier, decision tree classifier, random forest classifier, voting classifier, and Naive Bayes. The outcomes of the ROC and AUC analyses were employed to validate the validity of our proposed discrimination algorithm. The results show that the Random Forest Classifier is the most effective model, obtaining 100% accuracy in the case of feature extraction, while the best model for the time domain waveform classifier that achieved 75.5% accuracy is the voting classifier.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多机学习技术对核爆炸和天然地震进行地震判别
在地震信号分析领域,准确区分地震和地下核爆炸至关重要。作为对《全面禁止核试验条约》(CTBT)核查制度的贡献,我们为此采用了多种方法,包括复杂性、频谱比、mb-Ms(体波和面波震级)以及 P 波和 S 波的角频率。这些判别技术已被用于人工识别全球不同地区(如中国、印度、巴基斯坦、朝鲜和美国)的核爆炸引起的天然地震事件。为了收集必要的数据,国际地震学研究所(IRIS)利用宽带和长周期地震台站汇编了一个综合数据集,其中包括从 1945 年到 2017 年发生的 35 次地震事件中震级范围相同(4 ≤ mb ≤ 6.5)的核爆炸和地震。本研究的目的是采用一系列线性和非线性机器学习(ML)模型,自动区分地下核爆炸和大地震,以提高人工特征提取的准确性。为此,使用了时域波形和侧重于特征提取的不同分类器技术。采用的 ML 模型包括逻辑回归、K-近邻分类器、决策树分类器、随机森林分类器、投票分类器和 Naive Bayes。我们采用 ROC 和 AUC 分析结果来验证我们提出的判别算法的有效性。结果表明,随机森林分类器是最有效的模型,在特征提取方面获得了 100% 的准确率,而时域波形分类器的最佳模型是投票分类器,获得了 75.5% 的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Kula Volcanic Field (Türkiye) Through the Inversion of Aeromagnetic Anomalies Using Success-History-Based Adaptive Differential Evolution with Exponential Population Reduction Strategy Reliability of Moment Tensor Inversion for Different Seismic Networks On the Monitoring of Small Islands Belonging to the Aeolian Archipelago by MT-InSAR Data Stochastic Approach to the Evolution of the Global Water Cycle: Results of Historical Experiments on the CMIP-6 Models Basin Style Variation Along a Transform Fault: Southern Colorado River Delta, Baja California, México
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1