Assessing quality of critical care during an ongoing health emergency in a resource-limited setting: A novel approach to evaluate the quality of care in Lebanese public ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal for Quality in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzae028
Karim AbouNader
{"title":"Assessing quality of critical care during an ongoing health emergency in a resource-limited setting: A novel approach to evaluate the quality of care in Lebanese public ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Karim AbouNader","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Quality of care has been systematically monitored in hospitals in high-income countries to ensure adequate care. However, in low- and middle-income countries, quality indicators are not readily measured. The primary aim of this study was to assess to what extent it was feasible to monitor the quality of Intensive care in an ongoing health emergency, and the secondary aim was to assess a quality of care intervention (twinning project) focused on Intensive Care Unit (ICU) quality of care in public hospitals in Lebanon. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study nested within an intervention implemented by the World Health Organization (WHO) together with partners. To assess the quality of care throughout the project, a monitoring system framed in the Donabedian model and included structure, process, and outcome indicators was developed and implemented. Data collection consisted of a checklist performed by external healthcare workers (HCWs) as well as collection of data from all admitted patients performed by each unit. The association between the number of activities within the interventional project and ICU mortality was evaluated. Results . A total of 1 679 patients were admitted to five COVID-19 ICUs during the study period. The project was conducted fully across 4 out of 5 hospitals. In these hospitals, a significant reduction in ICU mortality was found (OR: 0.83, p<0.05, CI: 0.72–0.96). Conclusion We present a feasible way to assess quality of care in ICUs and how it can be used in assessing a quality improvement project during ongoing crises in resource-limited settings. By implementing a quality of care intervention in Lebanon’s public hospitals, we have shown that such initiatives might contribute to improvement of ICU care. The observed association between increased numbers of project activities and reduced ICU mortality underscores the potential of quality assurance interventions to improve outcomes for critically ill patients in resource-limited settings. Future research is needed to expand this model to be applicable in similar settings.","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzae028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Quality of care has been systematically monitored in hospitals in high-income countries to ensure adequate care. However, in low- and middle-income countries, quality indicators are not readily measured. The primary aim of this study was to assess to what extent it was feasible to monitor the quality of Intensive care in an ongoing health emergency, and the secondary aim was to assess a quality of care intervention (twinning project) focused on Intensive Care Unit (ICU) quality of care in public hospitals in Lebanon. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study nested within an intervention implemented by the World Health Organization (WHO) together with partners. To assess the quality of care throughout the project, a monitoring system framed in the Donabedian model and included structure, process, and outcome indicators was developed and implemented. Data collection consisted of a checklist performed by external healthcare workers (HCWs) as well as collection of data from all admitted patients performed by each unit. The association between the number of activities within the interventional project and ICU mortality was evaluated. Results . A total of 1 679 patients were admitted to five COVID-19 ICUs during the study period. The project was conducted fully across 4 out of 5 hospitals. In these hospitals, a significant reduction in ICU mortality was found (OR: 0.83, p<0.05, CI: 0.72–0.96). Conclusion We present a feasible way to assess quality of care in ICUs and how it can be used in assessing a quality improvement project during ongoing crises in resource-limited settings. By implementing a quality of care intervention in Lebanon’s public hospitals, we have shown that such initiatives might contribute to improvement of ICU care. The observed association between increased numbers of project activities and reduced ICU mortality underscores the potential of quality assurance interventions to improve outcomes for critically ill patients in resource-limited settings. Future research is needed to expand this model to be applicable in similar settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在资源有限的环境下,评估正在发生的紧急卫生事件中的重症护理质量:在 COVID-19 大流行期间评估黎巴嫩公立重症监护室护理质量的新方法。
背景 在高收入国家的医院中,护理质量一直受到系统监测,以确保提供适当的护理。然而,在中低收入国家,质量指标并不容易衡量。本研究的主要目的是评估在持续的医疗紧急情况下监控重症监护质量的可行性,其次是评估黎巴嫩公立医院重症监护室(ICU)护理质量干预措施(结对项目)。方法 我们在世界卫生组织(WHO)与合作伙伴共同实施的干预项目中开展了一项回顾性队列研究。为了评估整个项目的护理质量,我们开发并实施了一套监测系统,该系统以多纳比德模型为框架,包括结构、过程和结果指标。数据收集包括由外部医护人员(HCWs)执行的检查表,以及由各单位执行的对所有入院病人的数据收集。评估了介入项目活动数量与重症监护病房死亡率之间的关联。结果 .在研究期间,COVID-19 的五个重症监护室共收治了 1 679 名患者。5 家医院中有 4 家全面开展了该项目。在这些医院中,ICU 死亡率明显降低(OR:0.83,p<0.05,CI:0.72-0.96)。结论 我们提出了一种评估重症监护室护理质量的可行方法,以及如何在资源有限的环境中,在持续危机期间将其用于评估质量改进项目。通过在黎巴嫩公立医院实施护理质量干预措施,我们证明了此类措施可能有助于改善重症监护室的护理。我们观察到,项目活动数量的增加与重症监护室死亡率的降低之间存在关联,这凸显了质量保证干预措施在资源有限的环境中改善重症患者治疗效果的潜力。未来的研究需要将这一模式推广到类似的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Addressing the Continuing Challenges of Developing and Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Diagnostic performance of a newly launched Canadian fast-track ultrasound clinic by rheumatologists for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Exploring the Development of Safety Culture among Physicians with Text Mining of Patient Safety Reports: A Retrospective Study. Optimizing Neurosurgery Clinic Operations: A Comparative Study of Interventions in Finland's Public Healthcare System. Setting Standards in Residential Aged Care: Identifying Achievable Benchmarks of Care for Long-term Aged Care Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1