Screening mammography frequency following dense breast notification among a predominantly Hispanic/Latina screening cohort

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Causes & Control Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7
Erica J. Lee Argov, Carmen B. Rodriguez, Mariangela Agovino, Karen M. Schmitt, Elise Desperito, Anita G. Karr, Ying Wei, Mary Beth Terry, Parisa Tehranifar
{"title":"Screening mammography frequency following dense breast notification among a predominantly Hispanic/Latina screening cohort","authors":"Erica J. Lee Argov, Carmen B. Rodriguez, Mariangela Agovino, Karen M. Schmitt, Elise Desperito, Anita G. Karr, Ying Wei, Mary Beth Terry, Parisa Tehranifar","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Nationally legislated dense breast notification (DBN) informs women of their breast density (BD) and the impact of BD on breast cancer risk and detection, but consequences for screening participation are unclear. We evaluated the association of DBN in New York State (NYS) with subsequent screening mammography in a largely Hispanic/Latina cohort.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Women aged 40–60 were surveyed in their preferred language (33% English, 67% Spanish) during screening mammography from 2016 to 2018. We used clinical BD classification from mammography records from 2013 (NYS DBN enactment) through enrollment (baseline) to create a 6-category variable capturing prior and new DBN receipt (sent only after clinically dense mammograms). We used this variable to compare the number of subsequent mammograms (0, 1, ≥ 2) from 10 to 30 months after baseline using ordinal logistic regression.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In a sample of 728 women (78% foreign-born, 72% Hispanic, 46% high school education or less), first-time screeners and women who received DBN for the first time after prior non-dense mammograms had significantly fewer screening mammograms within 30 months of baseline (Odds Ratios range: 0.33 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.12–0.85) to 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.82)) compared to women with prior mammography but no DBN. There were no differences in subsequent mammogram frequency between women with multiple DBN and those who never received DBN. Findings were consistent across age, language, health literacy, and education groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Women receiving their first DBN after previous non-dense mammograms have lower mammography participation within 2.5 years. DBN has limited influence on screening participation of first-time screeners and those with persistent dense mammograms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":"300 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Nationally legislated dense breast notification (DBN) informs women of their breast density (BD) and the impact of BD on breast cancer risk and detection, but consequences for screening participation are unclear. We evaluated the association of DBN in New York State (NYS) with subsequent screening mammography in a largely Hispanic/Latina cohort.

Methods

Women aged 40–60 were surveyed in their preferred language (33% English, 67% Spanish) during screening mammography from 2016 to 2018. We used clinical BD classification from mammography records from 2013 (NYS DBN enactment) through enrollment (baseline) to create a 6-category variable capturing prior and new DBN receipt (sent only after clinically dense mammograms). We used this variable to compare the number of subsequent mammograms (0, 1, ≥ 2) from 10 to 30 months after baseline using ordinal logistic regression.

Results

In a sample of 728 women (78% foreign-born, 72% Hispanic, 46% high school education or less), first-time screeners and women who received DBN for the first time after prior non-dense mammograms had significantly fewer screening mammograms within 30 months of baseline (Odds Ratios range: 0.33 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.12–0.85) to 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.82)) compared to women with prior mammography but no DBN. There were no differences in subsequent mammogram frequency between women with multiple DBN and those who never received DBN. Findings were consistent across age, language, health literacy, and education groups.

Conclusion

Women receiving their first DBN after previous non-dense mammograms have lower mammography participation within 2.5 years. DBN has limited influence on screening participation of first-time screeners and those with persistent dense mammograms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在以西班牙裔/拉丁裔为主的筛查人群中,乳房致密性通知后的乳房 X 光筛查频率
目的国家立法规定的致密乳房通知(DBN)可告知妇女其乳房密度(BD)以及 BD 对乳腺癌风险和检测的影响,但对筛查参与度的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了纽约州(NYS)的 DBN 与主要由西班牙裔/拉丁裔组成的队列中的后续乳房 X 光筛查的相关性。方法在 2016 年至 2018 年的乳房 X 光筛查期间,我们用 40-60 岁女性的首选语言(33% 英语,67% 西班牙语)对她们进行了调查。我们使用从 2013 年(纽约州 DBN 颁布)到注册(基线)期间的乳房 X 光检查记录中的临床 BD 分类创建了一个 6 类变量,以捕捉之前和新的 DBN 接收情况(仅在临床致密乳房 X 光检查后发送)。结果在 728 名妇女(78% 在国外出生,72% 西班牙裔,46% 高中或以下学历)的样本中,首次接受筛查者和在之前接受非致密乳房 X 光检查后首次接受 DBN 检查的妇女在基线后 30 个月内接受乳房 X 光筛查的次数明显较少(Odds Ratios 范围:0.33(95% 置信度范围:0.33)):0.33(95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.12-0.85) 到 0.38(95% CI 0.17-0.82))。接受过多次 DBN 的妇女与从未接受过 DBN 的妇女在随后的乳房 X 光检查频率上没有差异。不同年龄、语言、健康素养和教育程度的群体的研究结果是一致的。结论:在之前接受过非高密度乳腺 X 光检查后首次接受 DBN 的妇女在 2.5 年内的乳腺 X 光检查参与率较低。DBN 对首次接受筛查者和持续接受高密度乳腺 X 光检查者参与筛查的影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
期刊最新文献
Indigenous access to clinical services along the lung cancer treatment pathway: a review of current evidence. Trends in pancreatic cancer mortality in the United States 1999-2020: a CDC database population-based study. Body mass index and the prevalence of high-risk colorectal adenomas in a population undergoing screening colonoscopy in Alberta, Canada. Is there an association between mastitis and breast cancer? a retrospective cohort study from Germany. Prostate-specific antigen testing patterns and prostate cancer stage at diagnosis in older Ohio cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1