The Effects of Capital Controls on Housing Prices

Yang Zhou
{"title":"The Effects of Capital Controls on Housing Prices","authors":"Yang Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11146-024-09983-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Policymakers increasingly use capital control policies (i.e., capital flow management) to manage capital flows. However, whether the implementation of such policies can effectively affect housing prices and to what extent is less discussed. In this paper, I study the effects of four types of granular capital control policies on housing prices using a large cross-country panel of 53 economies from 1995 to 2017. I find that the estimated effects of capital controls are distinct for different capital flow types and flow directions, but all capital control inflow indices appear to reduce housing prices in the long-run. Additionally, I find that capital controls have asymmetric effects on housing prices for advanced economies and emerging markets. The negative effects of capital controls on housing prices are mainly driven by pre-crisis subsample, which means capital controls have been in effect several times before the Global Financial Crisis. I also estimate the effects for boom and slump periods respectively and find that capital control policies are implemented in an acyclical way. Since there exists endogeneity for capital control on real estate transactions, I further use IPWRA method to rebalance capital control actions and find that IPWRA estimators can weaken the negative effects on housing prices, and the attenuation effects can be attributed to endogenous factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22891,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-024-09983-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policymakers increasingly use capital control policies (i.e., capital flow management) to manage capital flows. However, whether the implementation of such policies can effectively affect housing prices and to what extent is less discussed. In this paper, I study the effects of four types of granular capital control policies on housing prices using a large cross-country panel of 53 economies from 1995 to 2017. I find that the estimated effects of capital controls are distinct for different capital flow types and flow directions, but all capital control inflow indices appear to reduce housing prices in the long-run. Additionally, I find that capital controls have asymmetric effects on housing prices for advanced economies and emerging markets. The negative effects of capital controls on housing prices are mainly driven by pre-crisis subsample, which means capital controls have been in effect several times before the Global Financial Crisis. I also estimate the effects for boom and slump periods respectively and find that capital control policies are implemented in an acyclical way. Since there exists endogeneity for capital control on real estate transactions, I further use IPWRA method to rebalance capital control actions and find that IPWRA estimators can weaken the negative effects on housing prices, and the attenuation effects can be attributed to endogenous factors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资本管制对住房价格的影响
政策制定者越来越多地使用资本管制政策(即资本流动管理)来管理资本流动。然而,此类政策的实施能否有效影响房价以及影响程度如何,却鲜有讨论。在本文中,我利用1995年至2017年53个经济体的大型跨国面板研究了四种类型的精细化资本管制政策对房价的影响。我发现,对于不同的资本流动类型和流动方向,资本管制的估计效果是不同的,但从长期来看,所有资本管制流入指数似乎都会降低房价。此外,我发现资本管制对发达经济体和新兴市场的住房价格具有不对称的影响。资本管制对房价的负面影响主要来自危机前的子样本,这意味着在全球金融危机之前,资本管制已经多次生效。我还分别估算了繁荣期和萧条期的影响,发现资本管制政策是以非周期性的方式实施的。由于资本管制对房地产交易存在内生性,笔者进一步使用 IPWRA 方法对资本管制行动进行再平衡,发现 IPWRA 估计能够削弱对房价的负面影响,而衰减效应可归因于内生因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real Estate Automated Valuation Model with Explainable Artificial Intelligence Based on Shapley Values Differential Measurement Error in House Price Indices The Spillover Effects of Land Value Taxation: How Can It Affect Your Neighbors' Job Growth? The Impact of Monetary Policy on REITs: Evidence from FOMC Announcements Tax Induced Divestment in the Residential Market - Insights from Investors and Non-investors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1