Challenges, opportunities, and priorities for tier-1 emergency medical services (EMS) development in low- and middle-income countries: A modified Delphi-based consensus study among the global prehospital consortium

Abstract

Introduction

Though the disease burden addressable by prehospital and out-of-hospital emergency care(OHEC) spans communicable diseases, maternal conditions, chronic conditions and injury, the single largest disability-adjusted life year burden contributor is injury, primarily driven by road traffic injuries(RTIs). Establishing OHEC for RTIs and other common emergencies in low- and middle-income countries(LMICs) where the injury burden is disproportionately greatest is a logical first step toward more comprehensive emergency medical services(EMS). However, with limited efforts to formalize and expand existing informal bystander care networks, there is a lack of consensus on how to develop and maintain bystander-driven Tier-1 EMS systems in LMICs. Resultantly, Tier-1 EMS development is fragmented among non-governmental organizations and the public sector globally.

Methods

A steering committee coordinated a 9-round, modified Delphi-based expert discussion to identify current challenges, opportunities, and priorities in Tier-1 EMS development globally. 11 panelists represented seven Global Prehospital Consortium(GPC) member organizations with a mean 9.57 years of organizational Tier-1 EMS development/implementation experience(median = 9 years). The consortium represents the largest collaboration between organizations directing Tier-1 EMS programs globally across 12 countries on 3 continents(Americas, sub-Saharan Africa, and South Asia) with 22,000 first responders.

Results

The GPC identified seven priority areas for Tier-1 EMS development: infrastructure/operations, communication, education/training, impact evaluation, financing, governance/legal, and transportation/equipment. A high level of consensus exists regarding priorities for investigation, including Tier-1 responder density/distribution, Tier-1 patient data variable standardization for trauma registries/quality improvement, dispatch technologies/protocols, modular curricula, broader cost-effectiveness and impact evaluation indices capturing secondary impacts of EMS, standardizing legal protections for first responders, and transportation/equipment standards.

Discussion

Consensus is necessary to avoid duplicative and disorganized efforts due to the fragmented nature of parallel Tier-1 EMS efforts globally. A Delphi-like multi-round expert discussion among the members of the largest collaboration between organizations directing Tier-1 EMS programs globally generated relevant priorities to direct future efforts.