Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113079
Akilesh Ramasamy
Guidelines and practices in trauma care constantly evolve based on evidence available, and every healthcare provider who treats trauma should be up-to-date in trauma-care concepts. The Eleventh Edition of Advanced Trauma Life Support, released in 2025, contains a complete revamp of the foundational principles of acute trauma care, content design, delivery, and training, based on medical and educational evidence. In this edition, a significant update is the emphasis on control of exsanguinating/major haemorrhage (ABCDE to x-ABCDE where x stands for control of exsanguinating haemorrhage in trauma resuscitation. In addition to damage control resuscitation, some of the significant changes include recommendations for permissive hypotension, limiting crystalloids, early transfusion, neuroprotective focus, and modifications in operational principles in spine motion restriction. Some of these conceptual changes with their rationale are briefly described in this review as an update for any healthcare provider involved in trauma resuscitation.
{"title":"Advanced trauma life support 2025: A brief review of updates","authors":"Akilesh Ramasamy","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113079","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113079","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Guidelines and practices in trauma care constantly evolve based on evidence available, and every healthcare provider who treats trauma should be up-to-date in trauma-care concepts. The Eleventh Edition of Advanced Trauma Life Support, released in 2025, contains a complete revamp of the foundational principles of acute trauma care, content design, delivery, and training, based on medical and educational evidence. In this edition, a significant update is the emphasis on control of exsanguinating/major haemorrhage (ABCDE to x-ABCDE where x stands for control of exsanguinating haemorrhage in trauma resuscitation. In addition to damage control resuscitation, some of the significant changes include recommendations for permissive hypotension, limiting crystalloids, early transfusion, neuroprotective focus, and modifications in operational principles in spine motion restriction. Some of these conceptual changes with their rationale are briefly described in this review as an update for any healthcare provider involved in trauma resuscitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 4","pages":"Article 113079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146147345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113087
Yin Yang , Yongqing Xu , Jian Shi , Wei Yu , Xiaoqing He , Qixiong Guo , Xinyu Fan
Background
Masquelet induced membrane surgery is a viable option for the reconstruction of extensive bone defects. This study aimed to comprehensively compare the clinical efficacy of 3D printed microporous tantalum prosthesis and autologous bone graft in the final stage of Masquelet induced membrane surgery during the treatment of lower extremity fracture-related infections(FRI) with large segmental bone defect.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 43 patients with large segmental bone defect caused by lower extremity FRI treated with Masquelet induced membrane surgery. Among these, 21 patients were implanted 3D printed microporous tantalum prosthesis (Prosthesis group), while 22 patients were implanted autologous bone graft (Autologous bone group) in the final-stage surgery. Follow-up was conducted for 12 months postoperatively. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Paley grade for bone defect healing, Visual analog scale (VAS), Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), Fernandez-Esteve eschar score, and time to full weight-bearing. The clinical outcomes between the two treatment groups were compared.
Results
Postoperatively, the scores of VAS and LEFS significantly improved compared to preoperative values in both groups (all P < 0.001). Compared to the Autologous bone group, the Prosthesis group demonstrated significantly higher LEFS scores and Fernandez-Esteve eschar scores, along with a significantly shorter time to full weight-bearing (all P < 0.05). The complication rate was 19.0% (4/21) in the Prosthesis group and 9.1% (2/22) in the Autologous bone group; there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Patients experiencing complications received effective and targeted interventions.
Conclusion
Both implants show remarkable efficacy in the reconstruction of large segmental bone defect caused by lower limb FRI. However, 3D printed microporous tantalum prosthesis exhibits certain advantages over the autologous bone graft in terms of limb function recovery, bone callus growth, and early weight-bearing. However, when using this technique, one should be vigilant about the risk of complications.
{"title":"Matched comparative study of 3D printed microporous tantalum prosthesis versus autologous bone graft in the final stage of Masquelet induced membrane surgery","authors":"Yin Yang , Yongqing Xu , Jian Shi , Wei Yu , Xiaoqing He , Qixiong Guo , Xinyu Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113087","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113087","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Masquelet induced membrane surgery is a viable option for the reconstruction of extensive bone defects. This study aimed to comprehensively compare the clinical efficacy of 3D printed microporous tantalum prosthesis and autologous bone graft in the final stage of Masquelet induced membrane surgery during the treatment of lower extremity fracture-related infections(FRI) with large segmental bone defect.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 43 patients with large segmental bone defect caused by lower extremity FRI treated with Masquelet induced membrane surgery. Among these, 21 patients were implanted 3D printed microporous tantalum prosthesis (Prosthesis group), while 22 patients were implanted autologous bone graft (Autologous bone group) in the final-stage surgery. Follow-up was conducted for 12 months postoperatively. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Paley grade for bone defect healing, Visual analog scale (VAS), Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), Fernandez-Esteve eschar score, and time to full weight-bearing. The clinical outcomes between the two treatment groups were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Postoperatively, the scores of VAS and LEFS significantly improved compared to preoperative values in both groups (all <em>P</em> < 0.001). Compared to the Autologous bone group, the Prosthesis group demonstrated significantly higher LEFS scores and Fernandez-Esteve eschar scores, along with a significantly shorter time to full weight-bearing (all <em>P</em> < 0.05). The complication rate was 19.0% (4/21) in the Prosthesis group and 9.1% (2/22) in the Autologous bone group; there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Patients experiencing complications received effective and targeted interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both implants show remarkable efficacy in the reconstruction of large segmental bone defect caused by lower limb FRI. However, 3D printed microporous tantalum prosthesis exhibits certain advantages over the autologous bone graft in terms of limb function recovery, bone callus growth, and early weight-bearing. However, when using this technique, one should be vigilant about the risk of complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 4","pages":"Article 113087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146147346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To evaluate the clinical efficacy, wound healing quality, and functional recovery of a composite grafting technique using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and autologous split-thickness skin graft (ASTSG) for reconstructing complex ankle soft tissue defects.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study included 108 patients with ankle soft tissue defects (≥3 cm²). Patients were divided into an observation group (n = 55, ADM+ASTSG) and a control group (n = 53, pedicled skin flap). Primary outcomes were graft survival, wound healing time, and scar quality (Vancouver Scar Scale). Secondary outcomes included ankle function (range of motion, gait analysis), operative parameters, cost, and histological assessment of neotissue.
Results
The ADM+ASTSG group demonstrated a significantly higher graft survival rate (96.80 % vs. 78.22 %, P < 0.05) and superior scar quality at 6 months (VSS total score: 2.3 ± 0.8 vs. 4.7 ± 1.1, P < 0.05). Functional recovery was better, evidenced by greater ankle range of motion and gait symmetry (68.3 ± 5.2 % vs. 59.6 ± 4.8 %, P < 0.05). The technique also resulted in shorter operative time (36.6 ± 6.3 vs. 118.6 ± 11.4 min, P < 0.05) and lower hospitalization costs. Histologically, the ADM group showed more organized collagen fibers and a higher collagen I/III ratio, indicating more mature tissue regeneration.
Conclusion
The ADM+ASTSG composite grafting technique promotes high-quality wound healing and functional recovery in ankle soft tissue defects, offering a clinically effective and cost-efficient alternative to traditional flaps. Its ability to support structured tissue regeneration translates into superior scar quality and mechanical adaptability for the dynamic ankle joint.
目的评价脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)与自体裂厚皮肤(ASTSG)复合移植技术修复踝关节复杂软组织缺损的临床疗效、创面愈合质量和功能恢复情况。方法回顾性队列研究纳入108例踝关节软组织缺损(≥3cm²)患者。将患者分为观察组(55例,ADM+ASTSG)和对照组(53例,带蒂皮瓣)。主要结局是移植物存活、伤口愈合时间和疤痕质量(温哥华疤痕量表)。次要结果包括踝关节功能(活动范围、步态分析)、手术参数、费用和新组织的组织学评估。结果ADM+ASTSG组移植成活率明显高于对照组(96.80% vs. 78.22%, P < 0.05), 6个月时瘢痕质量明显优于对照组(VSS总分:2.3±0.8 vs. 4.7±1.1,P < 0.05)。功能恢复更好,踝关节活动范围更大,步态对称(68.3±5.2%比59.6±4.8%,P < 0.05)。同时缩短手术时间(36.6±6.3 min vs. 118.6±11.4 min, P < 0.05),降低住院费用。组织学上,ADM组胶原纤维组织更整齐,胶原I/III比更高,表明组织再生更成熟。结论ADM+ASTSG复合移植技术可促进踝关节软组织缺损高质量的创面愈合和功能恢复,是一种临床有效且经济的替代传统皮瓣的方法。其支持结构化组织再生的能力转化为卓越的疤痕质量和动态踝关节的机械适应性。
{"title":"Mechanical and clinical performance of acellular allogeneic dermis combined with autologous split-thickness skin grafts for ankle soft tissue defect repair","authors":"Yixin Zhu , Qinghua Lai , Zhiyi Wei , Juntao Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113088","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113088","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the clinical efficacy, wound healing quality, and functional recovery of a composite grafting technique using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and autologous split-thickness skin graft (ASTSG) for reconstructing complex ankle soft tissue defects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study included 108 patients with ankle soft tissue defects (≥3 cm²). Patients were divided into an observation group (<em>n</em> = 55, ADM+ASTSG) and a control group (<em>n</em> = 53, pedicled skin flap). Primary outcomes were graft survival, wound healing time, and scar quality (Vancouver Scar Scale). Secondary outcomes included ankle function (range of motion, gait analysis), operative parameters, cost, and histological assessment of neotissue.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ADM+ASTSG group demonstrated a significantly higher graft survival rate (96.80 % vs. 78.22 %, <em>P</em> < 0.05) and superior scar quality at 6 months (VSS total score: 2.3 ± 0.8 vs. 4.7 ± 1.1, <em>P</em> < 0.05). Functional recovery was better, evidenced by greater ankle range of motion and gait symmetry (68.3 ± 5.2 % vs. 59.6 ± 4.8 %, <em>P</em> < 0.05). The technique also resulted in shorter operative time (36.6 ± 6.3 vs. 118.6 ± 11.4 min, <em>P</em> < 0.05) and lower hospitalization costs. Histologically, the ADM group showed more organized collagen fibers and a higher collagen I/III ratio, indicating more mature tissue regeneration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ADM+ASTSG composite grafting technique promotes high-quality wound healing and functional recovery in ankle soft tissue defects, offering a clinically effective and cost-efficient alternative to traditional flaps. Its ability to support structured tissue regeneration translates into superior scar quality and mechanical adaptability for the dynamic ankle joint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 4","pages":"Article 113088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146147696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-11-03DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112863
Xiaojing Bai, Menghui Gao
{"title":"Letter to Social deprivation results in longer perioperative admission and decreased rates of home discharge after distal femur fracture","authors":"Xiaojing Bai, Menghui Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112863","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112863","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 112863"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145477294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-31DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112862
Guangdong Chen , Weiguo Xu , Yibing Chen , Lee A. Tan
{"title":"Concern on “Biomechanical evaluation of three different fixation methods for treating displaced tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament: A finite element analysis”","authors":"Guangdong Chen , Weiguo Xu , Yibing Chen , Lee A. Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112862","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112862","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 112862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113053
John D. Milner , Matthew Quinn , Ashley Knebel , Phillip Schmitt , Patrick Morrissey , Myka Dancy , Jonathan Liu , Simbarashe Peresuh , Michel A. Arcand , Andrew R. Evans , Brett D. Owens , E. Scott Paxton
Objectives
Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized public access to extensive information with large language model (LLM)-based chatbots allowing users to receive comprehensive, individualized responses. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality of LLM responses to questions about common orthopedic conditions. We hypothesized that both ChatGPT and Gemini would demonstrate high quality, evidence-based responses across evaluation criteria.
Methods
Responses from ChatGPT and Gemini to prompts based on the 14 AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines for clavicle fracture management were evaluated on six criteria by seven fellowship-trained shoulder and trauma orthopedic surgeons. Statistical analyses including mean scoring, standard deviation and two-sided t-tests were calculated to compare performance between ChatGPT and Gemini. Scores were then evaluated for inter-rater reliability (IRR).
Results
ChatGPT and Gemini demonstrated overall mean scores greater than 3.5 for both platforms. Mean overall score for ChatGPT was highest in evidence-based (4.52 ± 0.16) and lowest in clarity (4.22 ± 0.19). Mean overall score for Gemini was highest in clarity (4.31 ± 0.17) and lowest in evidence-based (3.81 ± 0.22). ChatGPT had significantly better performance in the overall completeness category (4.50 ± 0.17 vs 4.11 ± 0.19, p < 0.005) than Gemini but scores were otherwise not significantly different. Over 70 % of respondents rated the responses of ChatGPT as higher quality than Gemini.
Conclusions
ChatGPT and Gemini produced responses that were generally in line with the 2022 AAOS guidelines on the treatment of clavicle fractures. Scores were comparable in every overall category except completeness, with ChatGPT outperforming Gemini. These results suggest that both LLMs are capable of providing clinically relevant responses to questions related to clavicle fracture management.
人工智能(AI)通过基于大型语言模型(LLM)的聊天机器人彻底改变了公众对广泛信息的访问,允许用户接收全面、个性化的响应。在本研究中,我们旨在评估LLM对常见骨科疾病问题的回答质量。我们假设ChatGPT和Gemini都将展示高质量、基于证据的跨评估标准的响应。方法由7名接受过培训的肩关节和创伤骨科医生对14份AAOS锁骨骨折治疗临床实践指南的提示进行评价。统计分析包括平均评分、标准差和双侧t检验来比较ChatGPT和Gemini的性能。然后评估评分者间信度(IRR)。结果schatgpt和Gemini两种平台的总体平均得分均大于3.5分。ChatGPT的平均总得分在循证方面最高(4.52±0.16),在清晰度方面最低(4.22±0.19)。双子的平均总得分在清晰度方面最高(4.31±0.17),在循证方面最低(3.81±0.22)。ChatGPT在整体完整性方面的表现明显优于Gemini(4.50±0.17 vs 4.11±0.19,p < 0.005),但其他方面的得分无显著差异。超过70%的受访者认为ChatGPT的回答质量高于Gemini。结论:schatgpt和Gemini的治疗反应基本符合2022年AAOS锁骨骨折治疗指南。除了完整性之外,每个总体类别的得分都具有可比性,ChatGPT的表现优于Gemini。这些结果表明,这两种llm都能够为锁骨骨折治疗相关的问题提供临床相关的答案。
{"title":"Performance of artificial intelligence in addressing questions regarding management of clavicle fractures","authors":"John D. Milner , Matthew Quinn , Ashley Knebel , Phillip Schmitt , Patrick Morrissey , Myka Dancy , Jonathan Liu , Simbarashe Peresuh , Michel A. Arcand , Andrew R. Evans , Brett D. Owens , E. Scott Paxton","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113053","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113053","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized public access to extensive information with large language model (LLM)-based chatbots allowing users to receive comprehensive, individualized responses. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality of LLM responses to questions about common orthopedic conditions. We hypothesized that both ChatGPT and Gemini would demonstrate high quality, evidence-based responses across evaluation criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Responses from ChatGPT and Gemini to prompts based on the 14 AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines for clavicle fracture management were evaluated on six criteria by seven fellowship-trained shoulder and trauma orthopedic surgeons. Statistical analyses including mean scoring, standard deviation and two-sided t-tests were calculated to compare performance between ChatGPT and Gemini. Scores were then evaluated for inter-rater reliability (IRR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ChatGPT and Gemini demonstrated overall mean scores greater than 3.5 for both platforms. Mean overall score for ChatGPT was highest in evidence-based (4.52 ± 0.16) and lowest in clarity (4.22 ± 0.19). Mean overall score for Gemini was highest in clarity (4.31 ± 0.17) and lowest in evidence-based (3.81 ± 0.22). ChatGPT had significantly better performance in the overall completeness category (4.50 ± 0.17 vs 4.11 ± 0.19, p < 0.005) than Gemini but scores were otherwise not significantly different. Over 70 % of respondents rated the responses of ChatGPT as higher quality than Gemini.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ChatGPT and Gemini produced responses that were generally in line with the 2022 AAOS guidelines on the treatment of clavicle fractures. Scores were comparable in every overall category except completeness, with ChatGPT outperforming Gemini. These results suggest that both LLMs are capable of providing clinically relevant responses to questions related to clavicle fracture management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 113053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146079531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-10DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113023
David A Zuelzer , Andrew Coskey , Yugant Patel , Christopher Meuth , Milton L “Chip” Routt , Raymond D. Wright
Objectives
1) To evaluate common characteristics for injuries treated with multiple iliosacral screws in a single sacral osseous pathway to evaluate when it may be useful and 2) to determine whether placing multiple iliosacral screws in a single sacral OFP increases risk for unsafe screws.
Methods
Design: Retrospective, combined case-control and cohort analyses
Setting: Single, Level 1 regional trauma center
Patient Selection Criteria: Treated with iliosacral screws identified by CPT code search 27,216 and 27218
Outcome Measures and Variables: Population was divided into multiple screw (MS) and single screw (SS) groups. Outcomes of interest were factors associated with MS group and screw safety on postoperative CT scan.
Results
There were 133 patients with 53/133 (39.8%) in the MS group and 80/133 (60.2%) in the SS group. On logistic regression, each 2-mm increase in CT measurement was associated with higher odds of receiving multiple screws for sacroiliac style (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.05–1.71, p = 0.02) or transsacral if non-dysmorphic (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.25–1.93, p < 0.001) in S1. Patients were 3.4 times more likely to be in the MS group with C-type than B-type injuries (OR = 3.40, 95%CI 1.61–7.22, p = 0.0014). MS was not a risk factor for juxtacortical or extraosseous screw placement (RR = 1.93, 95%CI 0.66–5.65, p = 0.23).
Conclusion
The results of this study suggest that surgeons may place multiple iliosacral screws in a single OFP in more complex or unstable injuries and/or when larger safe corridors exist on preoperative imaging and that multiple iliosacral screws may not be associated with an increase in risk for unsafe screw placement.
目的1)评估在单一骶骨通路中使用多枚髂骶螺钉治疗损伤的共同特征,以评估何时可能有用;2)确定在单一骶骨OFP中放置多枚髂骶螺钉是否会增加不安全螺钉的风险。设计:回顾性、病例对照和队列分析。设置:单一、1级区域性创伤中心。患者选择标准:使用经CPT编码检索27216和27218确定的髂骶螺钉治疗。结果测量和变量:人群分为多螺钉组(MS)和单螺钉组(SS)。关注的结果是与MS组和术后CT扫描螺钉安全性相关的因素。结果133例患者中,MS组53/133例(39.8%),SS组80/133例(60.2%)。在logistic回归中,CT测量值每增加2mm,骶髂畸形(OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.05-1.71, p = 0.02)或经骶畸形(OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.25-1.93, p < 0.001)接受多螺钉治疗的几率就会增加。MS组患者出现c型损伤的可能性是b型损伤的3.4倍(OR = 3.40, 95%CI 1.61 ~ 7.22, p = 0.0014)。MS不是皮质旁或骨外置入螺钉的危险因素(RR = 1.93, 95%CI 0.66-5.65, p = 0.23)。结论本研究的结果表明,在更复杂或不稳定的损伤和/或术前影像学存在较大安全通道的情况下,外科医生可以在单个OFP内放置多枚髂骶螺钉,并且多枚髂骶螺钉可能不会增加不安全螺钉放置的风险。
{"title":"Multiple iliosacral screws in a single osseous fixation pathway: Utility and safety","authors":"David A Zuelzer , Andrew Coskey , Yugant Patel , Christopher Meuth , Milton L “Chip” Routt , Raymond D. Wright","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113023","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113023","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>1) To evaluate common characteristics for injuries treated with multiple iliosacral screws in a single sacral osseous pathway to evaluate when it may be useful and 2) to determine whether placing multiple iliosacral screws in a single sacral OFP increases risk for unsafe screws.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Design: Retrospective, combined case-control and cohort analyses</div><div><em>Setting:</em> Single, Level 1 regional trauma center</div><div><em>Patient Selection Criteria:</em> Treated with iliosacral screws identified by CPT code search 27,216 and 27218</div><div><em>Outcome Measures and Variables:</em> Population was divided into multiple screw (MS) and single screw (SS) groups. Outcomes of interest were factors associated with MS group and screw safety on postoperative CT scan.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 133 patients with 53/133 (39.8%) in the MS group and 80/133 (60.2%) in the SS group. On logistic regression, each 2-mm increase in CT measurement was associated with higher odds of receiving multiple screws for sacroiliac style (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.05–1.71, <em>p</em> = 0.02) or transsacral if non-dysmorphic (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.25–1.93, <em>p</em> < 0.001) in S1. Patients were 3.4 times more likely to be in the MS group with C-type than B-type injuries (OR = 3.40, 95%CI 1.61–7.22, <em>p</em> = 0.0014). MS was not a risk factor for juxtacortical or extraosseous screw placement (RR = 1.93, 95%CI 0.66–5.65, <em>p</em> = 0.23).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of this study suggest that surgeons may place multiple iliosacral screws in a single OFP in more complex or unstable injuries and/or when larger safe corridors exist on preoperative imaging and that multiple iliosacral screws may not be associated with an increase in risk for unsafe screw placement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 113023"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145981569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Prehospital management of suspected spinal injury has long relied on routine full immobilization. In recent years, several studies have questioned its benefit and highlighted possible adverse effects. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the evidence on the management of patients with suspected spinal injury, focusing on models based on full immobilization with rigid devices and a cervical collar, and on strategies of selective spinal motion restriction (SMR).
Methods
A scoping review was conducted according to JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidance, with a protocol registered on the Open Science Framework. The literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Studies on adults or children with suspected traumatic spinal injury managed in the out-of-hospital setting were included when strategies of full immobilization, selective SMR or no immobilization were described or compared.
Results
Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including observational cohorts, experimental studies on volunteers, simulation studies and qualitative research. Overall, no clear advantage of routine full immobilization over more selective strategies emerges. Selective SMR based on clinical assessment and decision rules appears to reduce the use of rigid devices without evidence of increased missed unstable injuries. Prolonged immobilization is instead associated with pain, discomfort, alterations in tissue perfusion and greater use of imaging examinations. The overall body of evidence is heterogeneous and largely based on observational studies, in which the influence of confounding factors cannot be fully ruled out.
Conclusions
The available evidence supports moving away from routine full immobilization towards selective SMR in the prehospital setting. Emergency medical services should update protocols and training accordingly and promote prospective studies focused on clinical outcomes and patient experience.
背景:长期以来,怀疑脊柱损伤的院前处理依赖于常规的完全固定。近年来,一些研究对其益处提出了质疑,并强调了可能的副作用。本综述的目的是描述疑似脊髓损伤患者的治疗证据,重点是基于刚性装置和颈套完全固定的模型,以及选择性脊柱运动限制(SMR)策略。方法根据JBI方法学和PRISMA-ScR指南进行范围审查,方案在开放科学框架上注册。文献检索在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行。当描述或比较完全固定、选择性SMR或不固定的策略时,包括在院外处理疑似外伤性脊髓损伤的成人或儿童的研究。结果27项研究符合纳入标准,包括观察性队列研究、志愿者实验研究、模拟研究和定性研究。总的来说,常规完全固定与选择性固定相比没有明显的优势。基于临床评估和决策规则的选择性SMR似乎减少了刚性装置的使用,而没有证据表明不稳定损伤会增加。相反,长时间的固定与疼痛、不适、组织灌注改变和更多影像学检查有关。整个证据体系是异质的,并且主要基于观察性研究,其中不能完全排除混杂因素的影响。结论现有证据支持院前环境从常规完全固定转向选择性SMR。紧急医疗服务应相应地更新协议和培训,并促进以临床结果和患者经验为重点的前瞻性研究。
{"title":"Prehospital spinal immobilization and motion restriction strategies: A scoping review of the literature","authors":"Federico Cucci , Dario Marasciulo , Roberto Lupo , Luana Conte , Giovanni Soldano , Cosimo Caldararo , Leonardo Zizzi , Emanuele Lagazzi , Michele Bonetti","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113024","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113024","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prehospital management of suspected spinal injury has long relied on routine full immobilization. In recent years, several studies have questioned its benefit and highlighted possible adverse effects. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the evidence on the management of patients with suspected spinal injury, focusing on models based on full immobilization with rigid devices and a cervical collar, and on strategies of selective spinal motion restriction (SMR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was conducted according to JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidance, with a protocol registered on the Open Science Framework. The literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Studies on adults or children with suspected traumatic spinal injury managed in the out-of-hospital setting were included when strategies of full immobilization, selective SMR or no immobilization were described or compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including observational cohorts, experimental studies on volunteers, simulation studies and qualitative research. Overall, no clear advantage of routine full immobilization over more selective strategies emerges. Selective SMR based on clinical assessment and decision rules appears to reduce the use of rigid devices without evidence of increased missed unstable injuries. Prolonged immobilization is instead associated with pain, discomfort, alterations in tissue perfusion and greater use of imaging examinations. The overall body of evidence is heterogeneous and largely based on observational studies, in which the influence of confounding factors cannot be fully ruled out.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The available evidence supports moving away from routine full immobilization towards selective SMR in the prehospital setting. Emergency medical services should update protocols and training accordingly and promote prospective studies focused on clinical outcomes and patient experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 113024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145981573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-17DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113052
Panayiotis Souroullas , Hemant Sharma , Gavin Barlow , Andy Craig , Ross Muir , Yvonne Hadland , Elizabeth Barron , Cher Bing Chuo , Joanna Bates
Introduction
Chronic bone infection is a challenging condition to treat, often requiring multiple surgeries and prolonged antibiotic therapy, which although effective, can increase patient morbidity and are resource intensive. This study was designed to evaluate midterm results of a single-stage management approach for chronic bone infection, incorporating debridement, local antibiotic delivery via calcium sulphate antibiotic loaded carrier (CALC), and soft-tissue coverage to effectively manage infection and improve patient outcomes while minimizing morbidity associated with multi-stage procedures.
Materials and Methods
In this retrospective observational cohort study, patients who underwent single-stage surgery with a minimum of two-year follow-up were included. Data on demographics and clinical outcomes were collected. Key objectives included assessing disease recurrence, treatment impact, and postoperative complications.
Results
Ninety-three patients, of which 60 were male, were included, with a mean age of 51 years. The median follow-up period was 57.5 months. The mean postoperative stay was 13 days. Thirty-nine patients were smokers, 11 were diabetics, and 10 had peripheral vascular disease. The leading cause of chronic bone infection was fracture related infection following trauma (n = 68), predominantly affecting the tibia (n = 33). Significant microbiological growth occurred in 77 patients with Staphylococcus aureus being the predominant pathogen (n = 42). Cierny-Mader classification revealed 31 patients with localized lesions in Class B hosts and 25 in Class A hosts. Only 24 patients required surgical stabilization at index procedure. Most patients (n = 70) underwent excision with primary closure, while 22 needed a soft tissue flap. Postoperative complications included wound leakage in 21 cases, with 13 recurrent infections, 10 of which needed further surgery. An infection control rate was initially achieved at 86%, and 89.2% at a 5.5-year follow-up.
Discussion and conclusion
Our study constitutes a large patient cohort with one of the longest available follow-up periods. Single-stage management of chronic bone infection with intralesional debridement using antibiotic impregnated CaSO4 pellets is safe and an effective method with low recurrence rates. Our results suggest that pre-operative sampling is not essential for successful outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach following the essential basic principles of the management of CBI is essential.
{"title":"Outcomes of single stage treatment of chronic bone infection in adults with antibiotic impregnated calcium sulphate beads; A single centre retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5.5 years","authors":"Panayiotis Souroullas , Hemant Sharma , Gavin Barlow , Andy Craig , Ross Muir , Yvonne Hadland , Elizabeth Barron , Cher Bing Chuo , Joanna Bates","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113052","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113052","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chronic bone infection is a challenging condition to treat, often requiring multiple surgeries and prolonged antibiotic therapy, which although effective, can increase patient morbidity and are resource intensive. This study was designed to evaluate midterm results of a single-stage management approach for chronic bone infection, incorporating debridement, local antibiotic delivery via calcium sulphate antibiotic loaded carrier (CALC), and soft-tissue coverage to effectively manage infection and improve patient outcomes while minimizing morbidity associated with multi-stage procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective observational cohort study, patients who underwent single-stage surgery with a minimum of two-year follow-up were included. Data on demographics and clinical outcomes were collected. Key objectives included assessing disease recurrence, treatment impact, and postoperative complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-three patients, of which 60 were male, were included, with a mean age of 51 years. The median follow-up period was 57.5 months. The mean postoperative stay was 13 days. Thirty-nine patients were smokers, 11 were diabetics, and 10 had peripheral vascular disease. The leading cause of chronic bone infection was fracture related infection following trauma (<em>n</em> = 68), predominantly affecting the tibia (<em>n</em> = 33). Significant microbiological growth occurred in 77 patients with Staphylococcus aureus being the predominant pathogen (<em>n</em> = 42). Cierny-Mader classification revealed 31 patients with localized lesions in Class B hosts and 25 in Class A hosts. Only 24 patients required surgical stabilization at index procedure. Most patients (<em>n</em> = 70) underwent excision with primary closure, while 22 needed a soft tissue flap. Postoperative complications included wound leakage in 21 cases, with 13 recurrent infections, 10 of which needed further surgery. An infection control rate was initially achieved at 86%, and 89.2% at a 5.5-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>Our study constitutes a large patient cohort with one of the longest available follow-up periods. Single-stage management of chronic bone infection with intralesional debridement using antibiotic impregnated CaSO<sub>4</sub> pellets is safe and an effective method with low recurrence rates. Our results suggest that pre-operative sampling is not essential for successful outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach following the essential basic principles of the management of CBI is essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 113052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-10-31DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112865
Wenwen Zhao, Hong Fan, Ying Chen
{"title":"Comment on timing of ultra-portable ultrasound (UPUS) examinations in detecting clinically concerning recurrent pneumothorax","authors":"Wenwen Zhao, Hong Fan, Ying Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112865","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112865","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"57 3","pages":"Article 112865"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}