Using Focus Groups to Explore Older Black Men’s Perception of Dietary Interventions

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Men's Health Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1177/15579883241241973
Ashley R. Shaw, Eric D. Vidoni, Mickeal N. Key, Brandon A. Yates, Roland Thorpe
{"title":"Using Focus Groups to Explore Older Black Men’s Perception of Dietary Interventions","authors":"Ashley R. Shaw, Eric D. Vidoni, Mickeal N. Key, Brandon A. Yates, Roland Thorpe","doi":"10.1177/15579883241241973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Older Black men are underrepresented in research despite being disproportionately affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors related to AD compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Although dietary interventions have shown promise to reduce modifiable CV risk factors related to AD, Black Americans have lower adherence likely due to lack of cultural considerations. Using a noninterventional convergent parallel mixed-methods approach, this study examined the cultural contexts that inform perceptions of dietary interventions among older Midwestern Black men. All participants completed an online demographic and dietary habit survey prior to focus group discussions. Two focus group discussion sessions were conducted with a total of 10 cognitively normal Black men aged 55 years and older. Survey data were analyzed using a frequency analysis and qualitative data were analyzed using a six-step thematic analysis process. Most men indicated having hypertension ( N = 7, 77.8%) and currently not following a dietary eating pattern ( N = 8, 88.9%). Emerging themes identified included (1) knowledge of dementia, (2) perceptions of dietary interventions, (3) barriers impacting participation in dietary interventions, and (4) overcoming barriers to engage Black men in dietary interventions. Findings from this study should inform the design of future dietary interventions for AD prevention to enhance participation among older Black men.","PeriodicalId":7429,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Men's Health","volume":"2010 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Men's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883241241973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older Black men are underrepresented in research despite being disproportionately affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors related to AD compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Although dietary interventions have shown promise to reduce modifiable CV risk factors related to AD, Black Americans have lower adherence likely due to lack of cultural considerations. Using a noninterventional convergent parallel mixed-methods approach, this study examined the cultural contexts that inform perceptions of dietary interventions among older Midwestern Black men. All participants completed an online demographic and dietary habit survey prior to focus group discussions. Two focus group discussion sessions were conducted with a total of 10 cognitively normal Black men aged 55 years and older. Survey data were analyzed using a frequency analysis and qualitative data were analyzed using a six-step thematic analysis process. Most men indicated having hypertension ( N = 7, 77.8%) and currently not following a dietary eating pattern ( N = 8, 88.9%). Emerging themes identified included (1) knowledge of dementia, (2) perceptions of dietary interventions, (3) barriers impacting participation in dietary interventions, and (4) overcoming barriers to engage Black men in dietary interventions. Findings from this study should inform the design of future dietary interventions for AD prevention to enhance participation among older Black men.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用焦点小组探讨老年黑人男性对饮食干预措施的看法
与非西班牙裔白人相比,老年黑人男性受阿尔茨海默病(AD)和与AD相关的心血管(CV)风险因素的影响更大,但他们在研究中的代表性却不足。尽管饮食干预有望减少与阿兹海默症有关的可改变的心血管风险因素,但可能由于缺乏文化考虑,美国黑人的依从性较低。本研究采用非干预性收敛平行混合方法,考察了中西部黑人老年男性对饮食干预的看法的文化背景。在焦点小组讨论之前,所有参与者都完成了一项在线人口和饮食习惯调查。共与 10 名 55 岁及以上认知正常的黑人男性进行了两次焦点小组讨论。调查数据采用频率分析法进行分析,定性数据采用六步主题分析法进行分析。大多数男性表示患有高血压(7 人,占 77.8%),目前没有遵循饮食模式(8 人,占 88.9%)。新发现的主题包括:(1)对痴呆症的了解;(2)对饮食干预的看法;(3)影响参与饮食干预的障碍;以及(4)克服黑人男性参与饮食干预的障碍。这项研究的结果应为今后设计预防注意力缺失症的饮食干预措施提供参考,以提高老年黑人男性的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Men's Health
American Journal of Men's Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
107
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Men"s Health will be a core resource for cutting-edge information regarding men"s health and illness. The Journal will publish papers from all health, behavioral and social disciplines, including but not limited to medicine, nursing, allied health, public health, health psychology/behavioral medicine, and medical sociology and anthropology.
期刊最新文献
Late-Onset Familial Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Lupus Nephritis in an 82-Year-Old Male: A Case Report and Literature Review. Bioinformatics Combined With Experimental Modeling to Study the Molecular Mechanism of Xuefu Zhuyu Decoction to Improve Erectile Dysfunction Associated With Asthma in Rats. Guijiajiao-Lujiaojiao Synergistically Promote Spermatogenesis in Tripterygium Wilfordii Polyglycoside-Induced Oligoasthenozoospermia Rats via PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. SPC25 Activates the Warburg Effect to Inhibit Ferroptosis in Prostate Cancer Cells. "A Man Has to Show That He Is a Man From a Young Age": Intimate Partner Violence for Young Male University Students in Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1