Development of a multidimensional scale to measure organizational creative capabilities

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Product Innovation Management Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1111/jpim.12733
Guy Parmentier, Zeinab Sheet, Florence Jeannot, Romain Rampa
{"title":"Development of a multidimensional scale to measure organizational creative capabilities","authors":"Guy Parmentier,&nbsp;Zeinab Sheet,&nbsp;Florence Jeannot,&nbsp;Romain Rampa","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the literature's case and longitudinal studies provide ample evidence of organizational routines that foster creative behaviors, it still lacks an integrative model of organizational creative capabilities (OCCs) and the quantitative evidence to validate such a model. This research is aimed at conceptualizing and developing a reliable and valid scale for OCCs. First, we define the OCC construct's domain by conducting an extensive literature review. We then generate a list of items for the five dimensions of OCCs through a qualitative study involving a group of 24 practitioners (Study 1a) and by surveying nine senior researchers (Study 1b). We refine the OCC scale using a sample of 269 responses collected in France and Canada (Study 2), and we conduct a first-order confirmatory factor analysis (Study 3). Finally, we perform a second-order confirmatory analysis (Study 4a) on samples of 220 responses collected mainly in the United States and Europe, generalize our results to a sample of 205 responses, and strengthen the predictive validity (Study 4b). Our results provide significant evidence that OCCs can be conceptualized around five dimensions: internal socialization routines, idea management routines, external openness routines, creative equipment routines, and internal agility routines. Furthermore, the research confirms the scale's good psychometric qualities, thus ensuring that researchers can be confident in the reliability of any future academic research design using the scale. We also validate the OCC scale's predictive validity by verifying that a five-dimensional reflective scale with 16 indicators has a significant positive effect on the creative outcome. This OCC scale can be used by practitioners to better understand the organizational routines they have to develop in order to strengthen their organization's creativity. It also provides a way for longitudinal studies to observe how OCCs evolve over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the literature's case and longitudinal studies provide ample evidence of organizational routines that foster creative behaviors, it still lacks an integrative model of organizational creative capabilities (OCCs) and the quantitative evidence to validate such a model. This research is aimed at conceptualizing and developing a reliable and valid scale for OCCs. First, we define the OCC construct's domain by conducting an extensive literature review. We then generate a list of items for the five dimensions of OCCs through a qualitative study involving a group of 24 practitioners (Study 1a) and by surveying nine senior researchers (Study 1b). We refine the OCC scale using a sample of 269 responses collected in France and Canada (Study 2), and we conduct a first-order confirmatory factor analysis (Study 3). Finally, we perform a second-order confirmatory analysis (Study 4a) on samples of 220 responses collected mainly in the United States and Europe, generalize our results to a sample of 205 responses, and strengthen the predictive validity (Study 4b). Our results provide significant evidence that OCCs can be conceptualized around five dimensions: internal socialization routines, idea management routines, external openness routines, creative equipment routines, and internal agility routines. Furthermore, the research confirms the scale's good psychometric qualities, thus ensuring that researchers can be confident in the reliability of any future academic research design using the scale. We also validate the OCC scale's predictive validity by verifying that a five-dimensional reflective scale with 16 indicators has a significant positive effect on the creative outcome. This OCC scale can be used by practitioners to better understand the organizational routines they have to develop in order to strengthen their organization's creativity. It also provides a way for longitudinal studies to observe how OCCs evolve over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定衡量组织创造能力的多维量表
尽管文献中的案例研究和纵向研究为促进创造性行为的组织常规提供了大量证据,但仍然缺乏组织创造性能力(OCCs)的综合模型以及验证该模型的定量证据。本研究旨在为 OCCs 建立概念并开发可靠有效的量表。首先,我们通过广泛的文献综述来定义 OCC 的结构域。然后,我们通过对 24 名从业人员的定性研究(研究 1a)和对 9 名资深研究人员的调查(研究 1b),生成了 OCC 五个维度的项目列表。我们利用在法国和加拿大收集到的 269 份答复样本完善了 OCC 量表(研究 2),并进行了一阶确证因子分析(研究 3)。最后,我们对主要在美国和欧洲收集的 220 个回答样本进行了二阶确证分析(研究 4a),将结果推广到 205 个回答样本,并加强了预测有效性(研究 4b)。我们的研究结果提供了重要证据,证明可以围绕五个维度对 OCC 进行概念化:内部社会化常规、创意管理常规、外部开放性常规、创造性设备常规和内部敏捷性常规。此外,研究还证实了该量表具有良好的心理测量学品质,从而确保研究人员对未来使用该量表进行学术研究设计的可靠性充满信心。我们还通过验证包含 16 个指标的五维反思量表对创造性结果具有显著的积极影响,从而验证了 OCC 量表的预测有效性。实践者可以利用 OCC 量表更好地了解他们为加强组织创造力而必须制定的组织常规。它还为纵向研究提供了一种观察 OCC 如何随时间演变的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information From the editors: Passing the baton Service robots and innovation: An ecosystem approach Issue Information Fueling innovation management research: Future directions and five forward-looking paths
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1